Beam line 13 fuels discovery fever for fundamental physicists

Jun 24, 2011 by Agatha Bardoel
Serpil Kucuker Dogan and Matthew Musgrave work on a helium-3 cell that is used to measure the angle at which the neutron beam strikes the liquid hydrogen sample.

( -- The simplest, most sensible "Big Bang" universe, theoretical physicists believe, would be one in which equal numbers of particles and antiparticles are formed in pairs. As the universe cools, most of these particles would encounter their antiparticles, and they would annihilate.

"In many ways, the most reasonable universe would be one in which there is no matter," says the University of Tennessee's Geoff Greene. "But that is manifestly not the universe we see. So something is wrong with the simple picture, and it is not understood why the universe actually has matter, instead of no matter, which makes more sense." This question, and others like it, are at the heart of the science that will be addressed at the now being commissioned at SNS.

13 is a cooperative venture between Basic Energy Sciences at DOE, which granted a beam line to nuclear physics, and the Nuclear Physics Program Office, which supported the construction of the FNPB and supports operation of the experiments.

Beam line 13 has an atypical user program. As with other beam lines, selection of approved experiments is made by a proposal-driven process, with the key criterion being scientific merit as determined by peer review. But at FNPB, a single experiment doesn't necessarily run for a few days, as most do at SNS and HFIR. Instead, it may run continuously for several years.

There may be as many as 100 collaborators. "They may come for an extended stay. They may send students. But each experiment may take a year or years to construct, a year or years to collect the data, and then it's taken down and something else of similar scope will be put in place," Greene explains.

There are two classes of experiment that the scientists will undertake. One is to determine the fundamental properties of the itself. The other will investigate the interaction of the neutron in very simple nuclear systems.

The first experiment at beam line 13, which is now in place, is of the second type: A very simple nuclear reaction is studied to investigate what happens when a proton captures a polarized neutron—a neutron with an oriented spin. In this interaction a gamma ray is emitted. Is it emitted randomly, in any direction, or is there a slight preference for the direction of the emitted gamma ray to lie along the spin axis of the neutron?

"Why do we care about this? Because only one of the four forces of nature—weak, strong, electromagnetic, and gravitation—is known to violate parity, to be 'handed'," Greene says. That is the weak force, which is "left-handed," and which is normally studied in particle decays. But very little is actually known about the operation of the weak force between pairs of nucleons (neutrons and protons, the particles within the nucleus of an atom). David Bowman and Seppo Penttila of the ORNL Physics Division are the principal investigators on this first experiment, which is a collaboration between ORNL, Los Alamos National Laboratory, and the Universities of Tennessee, Virginia, Manitoba (Canada), Arizona State, Kentucky, Michigan and others.
The target for the SNS neutron beam in this experiment is a sample of liquid hydrogen; this is effectively a target of protons, since each hydrogen atom has a single proton as its nucleus. The SNS pulsed neutron beam is fired at the target, which is surrounded by gamma ray detectors. The neutrons are polarized and are either "spin-up" or "spin-down." SNS provides 60 neutron pulses per second, and the researchers select the incoming beam's spin orientation to give an alternating orientation at the target. They then check whether the detectors see a corresponding alternating pattern of emitted gamma rays (less, more, less, etc.), correlated with the direction of the incident neutrons' spins.

Unless they observe a large sample of such incident beam spin reversals (more than 100 million), they won't see a discernible 'handedness' in the direction the gamma rays emitted from the nucleus because the "weak" force is so very weak relative to the dominant nuclear force (the "strong interaction"). Greene compares this to the flipping of a coin. To see if it is a 'fair coin,' it must be flipped a great many times to determine if there is a statistically significant bias between heads and tails. Once the direction of gamma ray emission is measured with sufficient accuracy, "we expect to see something. It is predicted at somewhere between 1 part in 108 and 1 part in 107. That means we capture on the order of 1016 neutrons. That, of course, is why we are at SNS-the most intense pulsed neutron source in the world."

The early results of this experiment, conducted at Los Alamos, were recently published in Physical Review C.

A second experiment is in preparation to look at one of the fundamental properties of the neutron-its moment.

Here, physicists want to determine whether the neutron is uniformly electrically neutral or its positive and negative charges are actually displaced slightly with respect to one another. "If it has such an electric dipole moment, that has a very profound implication. Because to have an electric dipole moment would require a violation of time reversal symmetry."

In physics, symmetry under time reversal (T) tests whether physical laws can distinguish between forward and backwards directions of the passage of time (the direction is sometimes referred to as the "arrow" of time). To a good approximation the laws of physics are symmetric (invariant, unchanged) under T.

If the neutron electric dipole is not zero, "that could shed light on a really fundamental interesting question, which is, why does the universe have matter at all," Greene says, "for most theories that seek to explain the matter-anti-matter asymmetry require a violation of time reversal symmetry."

Construction of FNPB began in 2002. The instrument team first opened the shutter for testing in 2008. The current neutron/proton capture experiment took its first beam in December 2010.

Explore further: The science of charismatic voices

Related Stories

Neutron physics instrument may unlock mysteries of universe

Sep 16, 2004

Fundamental questions that particle physicists have pondered for decades might be answered when a $9.2 million neutron physics beam line is built at the Department of Energy's Spallation Neutron Source on Chestnut Ridge. ...

Shielding for ambitious neutron experiment

Jul 24, 2008

In science fiction stories it is either the inexhaustible energy source of the future or a superweapon of galactic magnitude: antimaterial. In fact, antimaterial can neither be found on Earth nor in space, is extremely complex ...

Quarks take wrong turns

Apr 13, 2004

Physicists peering inside the neutron are seeing glimmers of what appears to be an impossible situation. The vexing findings pertain to quarks, which are the main components of neutrons and protons. The quarks, in essence, ...

Spallation Neutron Source sees first target replacement

Jul 27, 2009

Having outlasted all expectations of its service life, the original mercury target of the Spallation Neutron Source (SNS), the Department of Energy Office of Science's record-setting neutron science facility ...

New tool for proton spin

May 06, 2011

How the particles that constitute a proton give rise to is to its rotation, or ‘spin’, is an intriguing open question of contemporary particle physics. A technique that could provide some answers ...

Recommended for you

High-intensity sound waves may aid regenerative medicine

14 hours ago

Researchers at the University of Washington have developed a way to use sound to create cellular scaffolding for tissue engineering, a unique approach that could help overcome one of regenerative medicine's ...

Formula could shed light on global climate change

18 hours ago

Wright State University researchers have discovered a formula that accurately predicts the rate at which soil develops from the surface to the underlying rock, a breakthrough that could answer questions about ...

New world record for a neutron scattering magnet

19 hours ago

A unique magnet developed by the Florida State University-headquartered National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (MagLab) and Germany's Helmholtz Centre Berlin (HZB) has reached a new world record for a neutron ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (1) Jun 24, 2011
"It is predicted at somewhere between 1 part in 108 and 1 part in 107. That means we capture on the order of 1016 neutrons."
I hope that's 10^8, 10^7 & 10^16 !!
not rated yet Jun 24, 2011
There was a physorg article a while back that suggested that it is possible that gravity would be reversed between particles and anti-particles (the article didn't say this IS the case, just that it hasn't been ruled out). If true, that would mean that matter and anti-matter would repel each other and tend to form mutually exclusive "islands" in the universe. So half the galaxies we see *could* be anti-galaxies.

I'm just tossing this out there. It doesn't actually strike me as likely.

not rated yet Jun 24, 2011
Well, that possibility will get a definitive answer in not to long. CERN has already captured enough anti-matter for long enough, that they should be able to tell us whether it falls up or down in the near future.
1 / 5 (3) Jun 25, 2011
One should have known that the nature of all existence is only the illusion of our own minds.

See The Ultimate Theory of The Universe, Pram Nguyen, 2003, ISBN 1-4134-0425-1, and BUDDHISM EMBRACES ALSO GOES FAR BEYOND SCIENCE is posted on
not rated yet Jul 02, 2011
There was a physorg article a while back that suggested that it is possible that gravity would be reversed between particles and anti-particles

If that were the case though we would see clear breaks in galaxy filaments from annihilating matter, would we not? Plus using the same indirect methods we use to detect dark matter, it would appear that some galaxies would have negative mass relative to other galaxies.

Also I was under the impression that the possibility of antimatter galaxies was already ruled out by some optical technique. As much as everything would fall into place if we discovered half of matter was really antimatter, it simply seems that that isn't the case.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.