Today at around 10:50 CEST, the amount of data accumulated by Large Hadron Collider experiments ATLAS and CMS clicked over from 0.999 to 1 inverse femtobarn, signalling an important milestone in the experiments' quest for new physics. The number signifies a quantity physicists call integrated luminosity, which is a measure of the total number of collisions produced. One inverse femtobarn equates to around 70 million million (70 x 1012) collisions, and in 2010 it was the target set for the 2011 run. That it has been achieved just three months after the first beams of 2011 is testimony to how well the LHC is running.
"It's great to have delivered this amount of data in time for the main summer conferences," said CERNs Director for Accelerators and Technology, Steve Myers. When we set ourselves the objective of achieving one inverse femtobarn in 2011, it was for good reason: that amount of data could well give us access to exciting new physics.
The LHC experiments are now working hard to get results ready for the main summer physics conferences: the European Physical Societys High Energy Physics conference, which will be held in Grenoble from 21 to 27 July, and the Lepton-Photon conference, this year hosted by the Tata Institute in Mumbai from 22 to 27 August.
Among the new physics the LHC experiments are searching for are the Higgs mechanism and supersymmetry. The Higgs mechanism, and its associated particle, is the last missing ingredient of the so-called Standard Model of particle physics that explains the behaviour and interactions of the fundamental particles that make up the ordinary matter from which we and everything around us are made. The Higgs mechanism gives rise to the masses of certain particles.
Ordinary matter, however, appears to be only around 4% of what the Universe is made of. Supersymmetry is a theory that goes beyond the Standard Model. It is a more elegant theory of ordinary matter, and could also explain the mysterious dark matter that makes up about a quarter of the universe. With one inverse femtobarn theres a real chance that, if these theories are correct, they will start to manifest themselves in the data.
This is a superb achievement, which demonstrates the outstanding performance of the accelerator and of the operation team, said Fabiola Gianotti, spokesperson for the ATLAS experiment. It's really great to have such a large amount of data in time for the main summer conferences. The ATLAS physicists, in particular students and post-docs, are working hard and with great enthusiasm to produce exciting results, from precise measurements of the known particles to searches for the Higgs boson and other new phenomena. It's really a gorgeous moment!"
"With the LHC running at much higher intensity than initially foreseen, signals of new physics might appear any moment in our data," said CMS spokesperson Guido Tonelli. "Hundreds of young researchers all over the world are actively searching for new particles such as the Higgs boson, supersymmetric particles or new exotic states of matter. If nature is kind to us, we could have major breakthroughs even before the end of this incredibly exciting year"
A third LHC experiment, LHCb, requires less data than ATLAS and CMS, but has also exceeded its expectations for the year.
LHCb is currently taking data at a rate almost double that previously expected, thanks to the fantastic performances of LHC machine," said Pierluigi Campana, LHCb spokesperson. We are chasing the rarest events and the new possible asymmetries of nature that could show up in the decays of beauty quarks. The amount of data we are collecting will put LHCb in the position to unveil the flavour of new physics. This an exciting time for everybody, in particular for our youngest colleagues, who have a leading role in this scientific adventure."
Although recording data with proton beams, the fourth major LHC experiment, ALICE, is specifically designed for physics with lead-ion beams, which will come during the last four weeks of the LHCs 2011 run.
Explore further:
First atoms reported smashed in Large Hadron Collider (Update)

newsreader
5 / 5 (5) Jun 19, 2011This is very good news. Its nice to see the LHC running so well after all the inital problems.
Mschott
5 / 5 (1) Jun 19, 2011It will be interesting to see if they can cut off some Energy ranges for supersymmetric particles in the next coming years or make a revolutionary discovery. I am not sure what SUSY predicts. Any one know some basic parameters? It is amazing that the theory has survived for 40 years with no experimental confirmation.
orgon
not rated yet Jun 19, 2011IlliterateGraduate
1 / 5 (2) Jun 20, 2011Turritopsis
1 / 5 (14) Jun 20, 2011FroShow
5 / 5 (3) Jun 20, 2011Turritopsis
1 / 5 (13) Jun 20, 2011To create a singularity one requires perfectly aligned energy (focused on a singular spacial point). Infinite energy means a rational translation greater than or equal to Total Mass of Universe per its size after its emergence. If energy concentration is greater than that of the Big Bang we have a singularity. A rip in the fabric of spa
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (13) Jun 20, 2011To reemerge from an alternate reality the same principal applies. Energy equal to or greater than the energy used to create the singularity is required to return from it.
finitesolutions
3 / 5 (2) Jun 20, 2011The more physicists know about the universe the harder they search for more detail. Hmmmm. Watch out people these physicists will pop in and out of existence in your path pretty soon. They will be able to live on pure energy alone : they will maintain their biological processes with only energy intake and thus their digestive tube will become obsolete.
Nodrog
not rated yet Jun 20, 2011But not at the energy levels as LHC?
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (5) Jun 20, 2011Yes, physicists do have a sense of humor.
This is quite usual in science. Just look at the data from astronomical field surveys. Stuff that was recorded decades ago is still being analyzed. Particle collision data is no different.
aroc91
5 / 5 (10) Jun 20, 2011What the hell are you talking about? You can't just string buzz-words together and expect it to sound the least bit rational.
krundoloss
not rated yet Jun 20, 2011If travel between dimensions is possible (although you make it sound impossible, with infinite energy and all), how would we know if anything from our dimension can exist in another?
Sanescience
not rated yet Jun 20, 2011gwrede
1 / 5 (1) Jun 20, 2011That's why they have computers. And data warehouses.
Even a modern Formula-1 car generates data so fast during a race, that it takes weeks to analyze it, by the best engineers and massive computers.
Computers at the LHC sift, refine and store only the relevant parts from the massive data flow. Then other supercomputers again sift, refine and store that data, sorting out only the relevant information in that mass of data.
Only then do scientists start looking at what's left. And even that is an enormous amount of data. But you get the idea.
Ricochet
not rated yet Jun 20, 2011You mean like a wrinkle in time?
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) Jun 21, 2011Negative charges (electrons) and positive charges (positrons) when interact they destroy one another, merging of oppositely charged particles = light wave (alternating charge wave). Dark mass is matter with only positive, or only negative charges. Dark matter does not have light wave (photon) formation. No merging of negative and positive charges means no decay (weakforce) and no photons (em radiation). Matter of only one type of charge has mass (gravitational force) and it is either: 1. negative of charge or 2. positive of charge.
Decay is the result of negative positive mergance of energy. Photons and small particles emerge from matter because matter has negative and positive components the gravitational force produces pressure which determines density, this is strong force.
Dark matter doesn't decay. It is uniformly charged and therefore it doesn'
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) Jun 21, 2011Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) Jun 21, 2011Neutrons also emerge and they cause matter to get heavier without charge change.
Alpha gamma and beta radiation.
Dark matter does not form materials. Same charges repel and therefore keep a uniform distance from each other. Dark matter affects us 1. gravitationally, and 2. the repulsive energy of common charge.
Dark matter 1. adds mass and 2. Pushes space apart with the electric field it generates with spin. Repulsion and mass.
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) Jun 22, 2011- and therefore the distance between them grows. -
- 2. by way of dark repulsive energy. -
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) Jun 22, 2011Huge gravitational pressure is required for an UP quarks star to form. The positive charges repel each other, huge pressure is required to hold positive charges together. The UP quark star quickly begins to degenerate, the positively spinning charges begin to impact the charges beside them inverse their spin causing them to change their spin and charge. The UP quark star would quickly explode, BANG. If that didn't happen though, what would happen is reversal of 50% of UP quarks, leaving an equal amount of negative and positive charges, neutral net charge, a neutron star. If an UP quark star
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) Jun 22, 2011This illustrates the repulsive strength of common charge. This is dark energy.
- we cannot see electrons, we can only see the points in space where the negative energy of the electron interacts with positive energy. Photons are made when charges annihilate. No differing charges no photons. -
Johannes414
1 / 5 (5) Jun 26, 2011FroShow
not rated yet Jun 26, 2011LOL! That would explain my confused look while 'trying' to read what he wrote. Can anyone help explain what Turritopsis is saying? Much of what he said doesn't seem to come to a 'point' of any kind. What little I DO understand seems to indicate he's taking many current theories as fact and making some leaps. (not surprised his rating out of 13 votes is 1)
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (3) Jun 27, 2011True, but it makes it infinitely more likely to hit upon truth than simply basing ones' truths on nothing. ( ... or next to nothing -like the simple say-so in amn ancient book of fairy tales)
Ricochet
not rated yet Jul 05, 2011I think a quote from Ghostbusters is most appropriate here... "He's either a certified genius, or a pathetic wacko..."
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (1) Jul 06, 2011Authentic wacko most likely, but a wacko that dreams of furthering humanity by answering the most fundamental of questions: - What are we? Where did we come from? How did we get here? - and with all those answered we'll hold the power to direct where we are going.
FroShow
not rated yet Jul 07, 2011Johannes414
1 / 5 (1) Jul 07, 2011No, it is as likely as a monkey hitting a keyboard a billion years reproducing a play by Shakespeare.
antialias_physorg
3.7 / 5 (3) Jul 07, 2011Whereas you and your religious ilk have come up with...what exactly in the past 100000 years?
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) Jul 07, 2011First off, every comment I made directly relates to the article above (other than the comments directed at Ricochet and the one you're reading right now).
Secondly, my comments are well within the guidelines set forth by the minds behind Physorg.com which is more than I can say about yours above. I can compose my comments in any manner I see fit, that's my prerogative.
Lastly, please refrain from physical threats, if you'd like for this to escalate to something more than an online debate freely send me a private message containing your personal information, I'd be more than happy to fulfill your request. You're a disrespectful punk, I'm sure eventually you'll be taught a lesson... even if it is not by me.
Have a nice day
:)
FroShow
not rated yet Jul 08, 2011Admittedly, your last post does fit this request, but not at all close to what was desired.