German cabinet passes nuclear exit bill

June 6, 2011

German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks with Economy Minister Philipp Roesler before Monday's cabinet meeting

Enlarge

German Chancellor Angela Merkel speaks with Economy Minister Philipp Roesler before a cabinet meeting at the Chancellery in Berlin. The German cabinet signed off on a bill phasing out nuclear power in Europe's biggest economy by 2022, prompted by the disaster in March at Japan's Fukushima plant.

The German cabinet signed off Monday on a bill phasing out nuclear power in Europe's biggest economy by 2022, prompted by the disaster in March at Japan's Fukushima plant.

"I am convinced that the government's decision today represents a milestone in the economic and social development of our country," Environment Minister Norbert Roettgen told reporters in Berlin.

The pace of the switch-off is faster than that announced last week by Chancellor , with the nine reactors currently on line due to be turned off between 2015 and 2022, according to the text of the bill.

Previously Merkel had said that six reactors would shut down in 2021 and the three most modern in 2022. The seven oldest reactors were already shut down following the Fukushima crisis.

A further reactor has been shut for years because of technical problems.

The decision represents a humbling U-turn for Merkel, who in late 2010 took the unpopular decision to extend the lifetime of Germany's 17 reactors by an average of 12 years, keeping them open until the mid-2030s.

The bill focuses on ways to fill the gap left by nuclear power, on which Germany relies for some 22 percent of its energy needs.

This includes building new coal and gas power plants, expanding the production of electricity with like solar and , reducing Germany's and improving transmission networks.

(c) 2011 AFP

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Koen
Jun 06, 2011

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
All other Western countries should adopt Germany's feed-in tarif legislation for solar cells. Germany will replace nuclear for solar during the coming decades.
Edib0y
Jun 06, 2011

Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
That is just dumb. This is what happens when decisions are made based on emotion instead of science. "This includes building new coal and gas power plants". How is that better? That's far worse for environment and health.
Gilbert
Jun 06, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
looks like gas and coal would be temporary until there is a mass uptake of solar and wind, coal and gas plants are incredibly cheap to create, run and decommission.
ShotmanMaslo
Jun 06, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Replacing the best source of electricity known to humanity with dangerous fossil fuels and expensive renewables. This bill is not based on rational decisions, but on fear-mongering and populism.
marc_hemingway1
Jun 07, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
coal and gas are the most backward and hazardous means of electricity that exist.

as the others have posted, nuclear energy is our most efficient practical source of electricity; as well as being 100% better for the atmosphere than coal and gas so long as updated to modern safety regulations.
marc_hemingway1
Jun 07, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
i am really disappointed with Merkel on this one. However, she is way better that Germany's last chancellor.
Koen
Jun 07, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Typical "physics lover" comments thus far. Uranium mines are getting depleted for instance, and Fukushima shows "modern" savety regulations can't prevent total nuclear disasters. Congratulations Germany, for switching to solar power. The German feed-in-tariff law for solar energy is a huge success and this law should become effective in every industrial country. Upgrading the nuclear energy technology is doubtful (thorium really save??, breeder reactors stable??), while solar cell technology is still in its infancy and can be upgraded to become much more economical.
ShotmanMaslo
Jun 07, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Solar energy research received immense amounts of funding and attention over last 20 years, as well as subsidies. Result? Still not comparable in cost/TWh to nuclear by far. Solar cells have laughable efficiency, require toxic chemicals during manufacture, degrade over time, and work only during the day. That is not the energy source for 21.st century civilisation, much less the one we want to become in the future.
Gilbert
Jun 09, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
well looks like fusion is only a few decades off (~ 2050) so does it really matter, I'm sure Germany's emissions will pale in comparison to say the US/ Australia/ Indonesia!
hush1
Jun 11, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Americans. This is your opportunity. Make a killing. Cheap fuel rods for sale. Castor casings guaranteed. Hurry. Limited offer and supply.
Pkunk_
Jun 13, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Typical "physics lover" comments thus far. Uranium mines are getting depleted for instance, and Fukushima shows "modern" savety regulations can't prevent total nuclear disasters. Congratulations Germany, for switching to solar power. The German feed-in-tariff law for solar energy is a huge success and this law should become effective in every industrial country. Upgrading the nuclear energy technology is doubtful (thorium really save??, breeder reactors stable??), while solar cell technology is still in its infancy and can be upgraded to become much more economical.


There is nothing "modern" abt Fukushima. In fact it underlines how much better safety is in 2nd and 3rd generation commercial plants unlike the 1st gen designs which Fukishima was based on.

Isn't it pathetic that the Germans spend billions on installing solar panels and wind power to "fight global warming" and then throw away all those gains by just building 2 coal plants.
Shelgeyr
Jun 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The Germans will regret this.

Except... there must have been a ray of wisdom shining in there somewhere because they gave themselves up to a decade-ish to change their minds. That's smart politics (even if IMHO dishonorable). They get the benefit of stoking the public reaction, and then later when the true forthcoming costs start to sink in, they can abandon the plans with most/all the plants still in operation.

I'm betting that come 2022, Germany will still have plenty of nuclear power. Perhaps even more than now. I can't back that up of course - I'm just predicting.
ShotmanMaslo
Jun 15, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
As I said, here are the results of this bill:

http://www.treehu...ants.php
Rank 3 /5 (2 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Technology / Software

created 5 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (1) | comments 2

Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study

Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 3.6 / 5 (22) | comments 56 | with audio podcast

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Technology / Hi Tech & Innovation

created May 26, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (5) | comments 12 | with audio podcast report

HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world

(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the company’s ultimate vision, successfully producing ...

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 17 | with audio podcast report

Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22

Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.

Technology / Energy & Green Tech

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.5 / 5 (11) | comments 18


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...