Finches use their own form of grammar in their tweets
June 28, 2011 by Deborah Braconnier
Fawn Society Finches. Image: Wikipedia.
(PhysOrg.com) -- In a recent study published in Nature Neuroscience, researchers from the University of Kyoto in Japan have discovered that the tweets of Bengalese finches follow a set of grammatical patterns and rules.
Finches in the wild will react and call back when they hear unfamiliar songs that are usually from intruding finches. Dr. Kentaro Abe and Dai Watanabe used this reaction to test the finches.
They began by playing songs to the finches that were unfamiliar. They played the songs over a period of time until the birds stopped reacting and were used to the new tweets. They then mixed the order of the syllables within the songs and replayed them to the finches. When one of the remixes, named SEQ2, was played almost 90 percent of the birds erupted in response, however the other remixes received no reaction. What the researchers determined was that the finches in a particular social community seem to have some sort of syllable order that must be present within their songs.
In another experiment, the researchers showed that the knowledge of this syllable order is not innate and must be learned. He tested birds that had been raised alone and they showed no response to SEQ2. However, after the isolated birds had spent two weeks with the other birds, they too then showed a reaction.
Another experiment showed that the birds were able to learn new grammatical rules if the team played one of the remixes over and over again. Once these birds had learned the new rules, mixing the syllables up again found the birds reacting to a change in the syllable structure.
In a final experiment, Abe and his team chemically shut down an area of the finch brain known as the anterior nidopallium in some of the birds. This area of the brain is vital for the birds ability to understand the grammatical pattern in the syllables. He suggests that using this information, and studying the counterpart section of the human brain, could shed new light on the origins of human grammar.
More information: Songbirds possess the spontaneous ability to discriminate syntactic rules, Nature Neuroscience (2011) doi:10.1038/nn.2869
Abstract
Whether the computational systems in language perception involve specific abilities in humans is debated. The vocalizations of songbirds share many features with human speech, but whether songbirds possess a similar computational ability to process auditory information as humans is unknown. We analyzed their spontaneous discrimination of auditory stimuli and found that the Bengalese finch (Lonchura striata var. domestica) can use the syntactical information processing of syllables to discriminate songs). These finches were also able to acquire artificial grammatical rules from synthesized syllable strings and to discriminate novel auditory information according to them. We found that a specific brain region was involved in such discrimination and that this ability was acquired postnatally through the encounter with various conspecific songs. Our results indicate that passerine songbirds spontaneously acquire the ability to process hierarchical structures, an ability that was previously supposed to be specific to humans.
© 2010 PhysOrg.com
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
15 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
14 hours ago |
3.5 / 5 (14) |
33
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"The scientist does not study nature because it is useful, he studies it because he delights in it, and he delights in it because it is beautiful. If nature were not beautiful, it would not be worth knowing, and if nature were not worth knowing, life would not be worth living."
Henri Poincaré
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
"...the researchers showed that the knowledge of this syllable order is not innate and must be learned." - Deborah Braconnier
Yes.
The 'knowledge' of sound, (it's order and structure) is innate and intrinsic. You can not teach hearing. There is nothing 'learned'. Nature's evolution of life brings forth
'solutions' to sound that apparently bears an advantage over life forms without the ability to hear sound.
Hearing is no perquisite to any 'advantage' over other life.
Other life forms feel sound. How can we know if this is an 'advantage' or not?
There is little distinction between the mechanics of sounds and the mechanics of hearing. The origins of grammar come from the origins of language. The origins of language come from the origins of sound. And the properties of sound are innate and intrinsic, unlike language and grammar.
Jun 28, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
We are already there. Koko the signing gorilla, Dr. John Lilly's dolphins, a border collie that recognizes over 1,000 words, African grey parrots that use words correctly, and many others I'm sure. What we must learn to accept is that consciousness is not exclusive to humans nor the right to humane treatment.
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
You are SO full of shit. I can sense that you really WANT to say something meaningful. Alas, all you post is drivel.-For instance, is sound some kind of evolutionary 'riddle' in search of a 'solution'? And this 'order' of sound - do you think you can actually describe this thing without using equally empty terms?
You think posturing with phrases which SOUND like a carl sagan monologue can replace your actually SAYING something?
Jun 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
If you want to regard wave mechanics as the 'evolution' a wave must perform to fulfill the definitions put forth by wave mechanics and acoustics for sound that is fine.
2.)"do you think you can actually describe this thing without using equally empty terms?"
Sound is energy, Otto. If you want to know what energy does, simply go to a piano. Stand next to it. Undampened the strings (soft pedal) without touching the keyboard. Now clap your hands. The clap is an impulse of energy composed of all wave lengths.
As soon as this impulse of energy (the clap energy) reaches the strings, the part of that impulse of energy having the same wavelength as a string will vibrate (resonance). All the strings will vibrate (from resonance with the impulse)
The is call Fourier Transformation. For sound. There is zero difference between the strings of piano and the stereo-cilia of human ears.
Stop embarrassing yourself with ad hominems towards me.
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
I'm performing a community service here.
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The person asking.
Fourier Transformations are "name dropping" to you because you do not see the relevance anywhere here.
You performing a disservice to anyone in need of more than derogatory generalizations. You ask no specific questions.
For you, it is easier to label all you don't understand as crap, than to make an effort to understand. Like Einsteins' 16 field equations. To which you admit you do not understand and have resign to convincing yourself that you will never be able to understand them.