Facebook wants contract, emails in ownership case

Jun 02, 2011
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is pictured in April 2011. Facebook on Thursday demanded that a New York man who claims he is entitled to 50 percent of the social network immediately produce the purported contract and emails on which he is basing his case.

Facebook on Thursday demanded that a New York man who claims he is entitled to 50 percent of the social network immediately produce the purported contract and emails on which he is basing his case.

Facebook last week dismissed the contract as a forgery and in their latest court filing, lawyers for Facebook co-founder went on the offensive against the man who has filed the ownership lawsuit.

Paul Ceglia, of Wellsville, New York, is a "convicted felon and well-known scam artist who has spent the last decade of his life ripping people off," they said. "The contract is a cut-and-paste job, the emails are complete fabrications, and this entire lawsuit is a fraud."

Zuckerberg's lawyers asked the in Buffalo, New York, to order Ceglia to produce an original version of the contract and the emails and to allow for inspection of all of his computers.

In a suit filed in June of last year, Ceglia claimed that he signed a contract with Zuckerberg in April 2003 to design a website called "The Face Book" or "The Page Book."

Ceglia's lawyers have produced copies of emails and a contract purportedly signed by Zuckerberg, who was then a student at Harvard University.

But Facebook said the contract is fraudulent and "Zuckerberg has now declared under oath that he did not sign the contract attached to Ceglia's complaint, and that he did not write or receive any of the purported emails."

Facebook said Zuckerberg had done some work for Ceglia in 2003 on a site called StreetFax.com, which provided a photo database of traffic intersections for insurance adjusters.

"Zuckerberg and Ceglia never discussed Facebook and they never signed a contract concerning Facebook -- a fact that is not surprising given that Zuckerberg did not even conceive of Facebook until long after the purported contract was signed in April 2003," they said.

"Ceglia appears to have doctored the genuine contract -- which concerns StreetFax and StreetFax alone -- and then fabricated emails to make it appear that he and Zuckerberg were actually discussing and reaching agreements about Facebook," they added.

"The fact that Ceglia has spent the past seven years as a hustler engaged in various land swindles and wood-pellet scams further highlights the fraudulent nature of his claims in this case," they said.

New York state Attorney General Andrew Cuomo accused Ceglia in 2009 of taking more than 200,000 dollars from customers of his wood fuel pellet company and then failing to deliver any products or refunds.

Facebook's origins have been the subject of two recent books and a hit Hollywood movie, "The Social Network."

A pair of Harvard classmates, Tyler and Cameron Winklevoss, have been involved in a long-running dispute with Zuckerberg over Facebook, claiming he stole their idea for the social network.

The twin brothers agreed to a $65 million settlement but have been seeking to have the case reexamined. A California court this month rejected their bid and the brothers have said they plan to appeal to the US Supreme Court.

, which launched in 2004, has become the world's most popular social network with more than 500 million members. Zuckerberg's net worth was recently estimated at 6.9 billion dollars by Forbes magazine.

Explore further: Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Facebook rejects ownership suit as a 'fraud'

May 27, 2011

Facebook on Thursday dismissed as a "brazen and outrageous fraud" a lawsuit filed by a New York man who claims he is entitled to at least 50 percent of the wildly successful social network.

Facebook saga grows with new legal drama

Apr 12, 2011

The drama of the Facebook story heightened as a man with a shady past used old emails and a powerful law firm to press his claim to half the online social networking firm.

Court: Harvard twins stuck with Facebook agreement

Apr 11, 2011

A federal appeals court ruled Monday that former Harvard University schoolmates of Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg can't undo their settlement over creation of the social networking site.

Recommended for you

Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

12 hours ago

The owners of the website Ebola.com have scored a big payday with the outbreak of the epidemic, selling the domain for more than $200,000 in cash and stock.

Facebook goes retro with 'Rooms' chat app

Oct 23, 2014

Facebook on Thursday released an application that lets people create virtual "rooms" to chat about whatever they wish using any name they would like.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

LuckyBrandon
not rated yet Jun 02, 2011
they act like saying something under oath means its true...zuckerberg could EASILY be lying (but so could the other guy). they put too much faith in something said under oath. I mean seriously, what are you supposed to say when they say do you promise to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help me god...i would straight laugh in their faces and say sure, but i dont believe in god, so does that make my oath less the truth?
NOT starting a religion conversation here, simply stating that stating something under oath doesn't mean anything more than, oh, saying the same thing at the gas station to a stranger.
ereneon
not rated yet Jun 02, 2011
Not entirely true. Lying under oath is a crime and lying to a random person is not.
Doschx
not rated yet Jun 02, 2011
Even billionaires will go to jail if their testimony is found to be fraudulent while under oath. If it's found out that the original document is real he'll lose a lot of money then go to federal prison for perjury. In my opinion the penalty for perjury aught to include life imprisonment or the death penalty, even for minor civil/criminal cases. Hokey religions and ancient texts are no match for a gun pressed to your side.
FrankHerbert
1 / 5 (3) Jun 03, 2011
"Even billionaires will go to jail if their testimony is found to be fraudulent while under oath."

Ehhh, but this doesn't happen. Either the billionaire will be coached so well by his lawyer that he won't actually answer any questions (e.g. just about any congressional hearing) or no one gives a shit because he's a billionaire.