Dating an ancient episode of severe global warming
The image shows a location in Longyearbyen, Spisbergen, where the researchers carried out field work. Credit: Ian Harding
Using sophisticated methods of dating rocks, a team including University of Southampton researchers based at the National Oceanography Centre, Southampton, have pinned down the timing of the start of an episode of an ancient global warming known as the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum (PETM), with implications for the triggering mechanism.
The early part of the Cenozoic era, which started around 65.5 million years ago witnessed a series of transient global warming events called hyperthermals. The most severe of these was the PETM at the PaleoceneEocene boundary, around 56 million years ago. Over a period of around 20,000 years, a mere blink of the eye in geological terms, ocean temperatures rose globally by approximately 5 C. There is evidence that the concentration of atmospheric carbon oxide increased, but the phenomena that triggered the event remain controversial.
One possibility is that these hyperthermals were driven by cyclic variations in the eccentricity of the Earth's orbit around the sun. At the cycle peaks, increased temperatures could have caused methane hydrate deposits in the deep sea to release large amounts of methane. Some of this potent greenhouse gas would have entered the atmosphere resulting in further intensification of the climatic warming, which would have continued as the methane was fairly rapidly converted into carbon dioxide in the atmosphere.
Alternatively, it may have been geological processes, unrelated to variation in the Earth's orbit, which could have been the culprit for the warming associated with the PETM. In this scenario, magmatism would have caused the baking of marine organic sediments, leading to the massive release of methane and/or carbon dioxide, possibly through hydrothermal vents, thus initiating the global warming which led to the methane release.
"Determining exactly what triggered the PETM requires very accurate dating of the event itself, to determine whether it occurred during a known maximum in the Earth's orbital eccentricity" explains Adam Charles, a University of Southampton PhD student supervised by Dr Ian Harding, and first author of the newly published report.
To getter a better grip on the numerical age of the PaleoceneEocene boundary, the researchers measured radio-isotopes of uranium and lead in the mineral zircon, found as crystals in two volcanic ash horizons deposited during the PETM. These rocks were collected from two locations in Spitsbergen, the largest island of the Svalbard Archipelago in the Arctic.
Based on their data, the researchers dated the PaleoceneEocene boundary at between 55.728 and 55.964 million years ago, which they believe to be the most accurate estimate to date. Their analyses indicated that the onset of the PETM, unlike those of other Eocene hyperthermals, did not occur at the peak of a 400 thousand year cycle in the Earth's orbital eccentricity. Instead, it occurred on the falling limb of a cycle when warming by the sun would not have been at a maximum.
"Compared to other early Eocene hyperthermals, it appears that the PETM was triggered by a different mechanism, and thus may have involved volcanism. However, a thorough test of this hypothesis will require further detailed dating studies," Adam concluded.
More information: Charles, A. J., Condon, D. J., Harding, I. C., Pälike, H., Marshall, J. E. A., Cui, Y. & Kump, L. Constraints on the numerical age of the PaleoceneEocene boundary. Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems 12, Q0AA17, doi:10.1029/2010GC003426
Provided by National Oceanography Centre, Southampton
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
10 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)
The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
5 / 5 (10) |
19
Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue
UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.
May 23, 2012 |
3.7 / 5 (7) |
39
Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director
Alien life probably isnt interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 25, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (13) |
37
What's the big deal about private space launches?
(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (6) |
32
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (11)
The logic of the above phrase is amazing.
They are assuming glaciation is normal and warming up is abnormal.
In the last few million years glaciation is normal and warming is abnormal. 90% of the time there are massive ice sheets covering a large part of the earth.
Aren't we lucky to be living in a warm time?
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
I don't know that luck has much to do with it.
I think it could be argued that, at least in significant part, it is precisely because of the "warm time" that we've flourished.
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Personally, I do not see any hint of determination of what is normal or abnormal in this article regarding the phrase you quoted, i.e., "ancient global warming."
Perhaps it is your own interpretation of "what they are assuming" that is the problem?
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
This article is all about finding the date of the start of a warming period. Has the debate over current global climate issues degenerated so much that we can't even speak of previous cold and warm periods?
Chill out. Even the authors aknowledge the still unknown triggers of this warming, clearly stating that it could be due to the earth eccentric rotation around the sun at the time or due be driven by a more biological reason.
Are you simply bothered (due to bias) that both of their potential causes induce a similar increase of methane and/or CO2 in the atmosphere? Are you trying to debate the existence of the Greenhouse effect?
emsquared. I would strongly agree with you that the rise of "civilizations" as we know them now is largely due to having a warm period.
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (11)
We should be very, very grateful glaciers are no longer advancing. That means agriculture gets to flourish, and we can feed ourselves and we get to live instead of starving to death in the cold.
Remember the article does say: "There is evidence that the concentration of atmospheric carbon oxide increased"
Yet they are only talking about 5C of warming in 20,000 years.
The Eemian (previous interglacial) warmed up 12C in 7500 years ... with CO2 lagging temperature.
http://www.ferdin...ian.html
Jun 15, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Historically yes, glaciers have advanced and retreated. What GW has done is to make glacier retreat amazingly fast, like decades verse centuries.
It is pretty foolish to shrug off 5degrees C, I mean occasionally there are unusual days, but the 5C (~9F) is an average for the year to GW. And that is global. See the problem with Agriculture is not that the pants don't like the extra CO2, but the other things that go with 5C increases, like droughts, evaporation of water supplies, etc.
I think you are minimizing the consequences of GW.
Jun 16, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Jun 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Perhaps just a small technical point here, but I think it's fair to say that the ice ages played a huge part in our current success too. There were vast human migrations during the ice ages. Who knows what would have happened if we hadn't spread out like we did?
Jun 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
There were two periods before 1950 where it warmed just fast as it has recently. Natural variability.
1910 to 1940
1860 to 1880