Companies may not profit from offering loyalty programs: study

Jun 29, 2011
Professor Saeed Zolfhaghari and PhD candidate Amir Gandomi have developed a mathematical model that evaluates the profitability of loylaty programs.

A wallet full of loyalty and points cards is a common sight for many people. The results of a new study out of Ryerson University which examines the profitability of loyalty programs indicate that some companies may be better off not offering this type of customer incentive.

Saeed Zolfaghari, professor and director of the program at Ryerson University, and PhD candidate Amir Gandomi, co-authors of the study, discovered that despite the high rate of participation in loyalty programs there has been little analytical research to date. As a result, Zolfaghari and Gandomi developed a that measures their effectiveness.

“Loyalty programs entice people to become, and remain, customers,” says Zolfaghari. “Our model demonstrates that if average customer satisfaction increases over time there is less incentive for a company to offer a loyalty program. Essentially, your customers are already happy with you.”

The finding may seem intuitive, Zolfaghari says, but up until now there hasn’t been a scientific way to verify it. The analytical model developed by Zolfaghari and Gandomi takes both the customers’ product valuations and their satisfaction levels into account. The objective of the model is to maximize a company’s revenues based on two criteria: the price of a product sold in two separate periods, and the amount of the loyalty reward offered. Customers who made a purchase in both buying periods were offered a reward in the form of a discount on the price in the second period. A common example of this kind of discount is a coupon offering 15 per cent off the next purchase made within the following two months. 

“In our model, we also found that as the number of customers who intended to make a purchase in the second period increased, a company had to increase their price in the first period to offset the discount offered on subsequent purchases. To make up for increased reward costs in the future, you need to increase your prices in the present,” says Zolfaghari.

Zolfaghari cautions that more work is needed before companies can incorporate the model in their own decision-making processes. “This is the first step in the right direction. Going forward, we will eliminate some assumptions and add new attributes to make the model more realistic. But eventually, a company could adopt our model to design new loyalty programs or improve the profitability of existing ones.”

Explore further: Narcissistic CEOs and financial performance

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Staff 'false smiles' won't bring customers back: study

May 11, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Companies should invest effort in convincing their staff about their marketing messages as well as trying to convince their customers, according to The University of Queensland's Associate Professor of Marketing ...

Recommended for you

Narcissistic CEOs and financial performance

Jul 24, 2014

Narcissism, considered by some as the "dark side of the executive personality," may actually be a good thing when it comes to certain financial measures, with companies led by narcissistic CEOs outperforming those helmed ...

Drugmaker GSK slashes annual profits forecast

Jul 23, 2014

British drugmaker GlaxoSmithKline on Wednesday slashed its 2014 profits forecast as second-quarter earnings sank on the back of weak US trade, adverse currency moves and a Chinese bribery probe.

User comments : 0