Canadian researchers devise method to directly measure the quantum wavefunction

June 16, 2011 by Bob Yirka report

Canadian researchers devise method to directly measure the wavefunction

Enlarge

Direct measurement of the photon transverse wavefunction. Image: Nature, doi:10.1038/nature10120

(PhysOrg.com) -- Physics researchers working at the National Research Council in Canada have succeeded in developing a way to directly measure the wavefunction of a photon. The technique, as described in their paper published in Nature, combines both strong and weak measurements, and offers researchers a new tool for use in understanding the intricacies of quantum mechanics. The wavefunction is a mathematical function that describes the quantum state of a particle.

Until now, physicists have had to resort to using quantum to gather information about the real wavefunction (as opposed to the virtual one described by math formulas), a method that relies on indirect measurements and alters the target it’s trying to measure in the process. This is because of Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle, which states that the location and momentum of a single particle can’t be simultaneously measured; because by its very nature, the waveform is altered by direct observation.

To get around that problem, the team, led by Jeff Lundeen, devised a method based on “weak” measurements, whereby an observation is made that only alters the particle just a little tiny bit and gives information about just one property of the particle at a time. Taking multiple such measurements of identical copies of a particle, such as a photon, gives more and more information, eventually approaching a very close approximation to the actual state of the system. In one respect this approach is similar to the way calculus is used to measure irregularly shaped objects by cutting it into a number that approaches infinity, virtual slices, then adding up the results. When combined with more certain “strong” measurement results, the procedure provides an accurate measurement of the wavefunction.

The wavefunction is a big deal in physics because it can be used to predict how a particle will react with other particles, where it will be at a given time, or how fast it will be traveling; that are needed when building microelectronics, or one day perhaps a true quantum computer.

Lundeen points out that this new method doesn’t actually provide any new information about the waveform; it’s more like it provides researchers with a new tool. He also says the technique could be used to measure the waveform of other such as ions, electrons and molecules.

More information: Direct measurement of the quantum wavefunction, Nature 474, 188–191 (09 June 2011) doi:10.1038/nature10120

Abstract
The wavefunction is the complex distribution used to completely describe a quantum system, and is central to quantum theory. But despite its fundamental role, it is typically introduced as an abstract element of the theory with no explicit definition. Rather, physicists come to a working understanding of the wavefunction through its use to calculate measurement outcome probabilities by way of the Born rule. At present, the wavefunction is determined through tomographic methods, which estimate the wavefunction most consistent with a diverse collection of measurements. The indirectness of these methods compounds the problem of defining the wavefunction. Here we show that the wavefunction can be measured directly by the sequential measurement of two complementary variables of the system. The crux of our method is that the first measurement is performed in a gentle way through weak measurement, so as not to invalidate the second. The result is that the real and imaginary components of the wavefunction appear directly on our measurement apparatus. We give an experimental example by directly measuring the transverse spatial wavefunction of a single photon, a task not previously realized by any method. We show that the concept is universal, being applicable to other degrees of freedom of the photon, such as polarization or frequency, and to other quantum systems—for example, electron spins, SQUIDs (superconducting quantum interference devices) and trapped ions. Consequently, this method gives the wavefunction a straightforward and general definition in terms of a specific set of experimental operations19. We expect it to expand the range of quantum systems that can be characterized and to initiate new avenues in fundamental quantum theory.

© 2010 PhysOrg.com

4.8 /5 (15 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

orgon
Jun 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The general understanding was, only the probability density distribution is, what remains observable from quantum physics, not the quantum wave as such. But if such view would be true absolutely, than the quantum world would be statical and atemporal. As we can observe with Brownian motion for example, the dynamic nature of quantum mechanics still manifests clearly.

So, where's the trick of this experiment? The quantum wave function still remain unobservable as a whole, or it would violate the uncertainty principle. But the principle of so-called weak measurement enables to observe it with using of so-called stroboscopic effect: during each measurement the quantum waves collapses nearly completely, but it's restored again before a new sample is taken. When the frequency of sampling is synchronized with frequency of quantum wave, then the time evolution of quantum wave can be observed, although we are effectively observing a restored, i.e. not original wave during each sample.
orgon
Jun 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Recently the similar theorem of Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics was shifted. It basically claims, during double slit experiment the path of photons cannot be observed, or their interference patterns will collapse into Gaussian shape, which the single slit produces.

But as the experiment demonstrated, with careful sampling it's still possible to trace the path of photons in subsequent observations in such a way, their interference is not impacted. Again, the main trick here is in usage of multiple weak measurements, not just single "hard" one, which would collapse the quantum wave undeniably.

http://www.nature...344.html
maxcypher
Jun 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
How do they get the "identical copies" of the photon?
orgon
Jun 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"identical copies" of the photon?
This sentence is a bit misleading, as these Canadians used collinear photons, i.e. photons with the same phase and amplitude, but with perpendicular polarization. Such photons are routinely produced with shinning of near infrared laser to the nonlinear optical crystal of beta barium borate under certain angle. It generates coherent pairs of short wavelength photons, which can be used in subsequent experiments. You can imagine it like laser, which generates two photons during stimulated emission instead of single one. Such lasing is indeed quite rare, but if you pump BBO crystal with sufficiently intensive light from another laser, you can succeed in generation of such entangled pairs.
orgon
Jun 16, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The BBO crystal is unique with the fact, it's both birefringent, i.e. its refractive index strongly depends on the direction of polarization of light, both strongly piezoelectric (which means, the impulse of electric field can generate mechanic vibrations of lattice). When laser stimulates some atom in BBO lattice to emission of photon, the corresponding electric impulse deforms lattice in such a way, another photon from neighboring atom is released too at the same moment. When these two photons differ with their polarization sufficiently, they propagate through birefringent crystal with different speed, so they're refracted with its surface under different angle and they can be handled separately.
StandingBear
Jun 16, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Who knows, it might even get a handle on a quantum reason and/or calculation for the speed of light...why it is THAT speed and not ANOTHER speed. Maybe manipulation of wave functions in micro would have an effect in macro as well. Comments?
miles670
Jun 19, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Brilliant article and the comments really helped clear up a few misunderstandings for me. Thankyou all!
Rank 4.8 /5 (15 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • Question about high electric charge.
    created1 hour ago
  • eyeglasses with smallest chromatic abberation
    created5 hours ago
  • Linear momentum converted to angular momentum?!
    created5 hours ago
  • Physics laboratory project - bumpers/crash tests
    created5 hours ago
  • How to open a winebottle with a shoe
    created5 hours ago
  • magnetic field from stream of protons
    created15 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - Classical Physics

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (16) | comments 42 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.2 / 5 (21) | comments 47 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 15 | with audio podcast

Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots

(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of “robots” as a laser ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2 | with audio podcast weblog

Sound increases the efficiency of boiling

Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...

Physics / Soft Matter

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...