Regulation blocking genetically engineered food animal development, report finds
The time-consuming regulation of genetically engineered plants and animals has serious long-term implications for agriculture and food security in the United States.
(PhysOrg.com) -- A cumbersome and time-consuming federal regulatory process is stifling commercial investment in the development of genetically engineered animals for food and has serious long-term implications for agriculture and food security in the United States, reports a task force of experts led by a UC Davis animal scientist.
Although humans and animals have been consuming genetically engineered food from plants for years, images of genetically engineered animals open new and often contentious debates about the issue, said Alison Van Eenennaam, the reports lead author and a UC Davis Cooperative Extension specialist in animal genomics and biotechnology.
Some of the controversy regarding GE animals stems from issues of regulatory oversight of research, development, and post-approval marketing, she said.
In the report, various stakeholders point out strengths and weaknesses in the U.S. Food and Drug Administrations regulatory approach. The task force members address:
• thoroughness of the premarket product review process for safety and efficacy;
• potential for withdrawing FDA endorsement after a product has been approved;
• need for public transparency in the review process;
• the FDAs lack of authority to consider ethics and other social concerns;
• reliance on data produced by the corporation seeking approval; and
• lack of provision for environmental review.
The task force also determined that the issues are clouded by the potential for opposition groups to delay or obstruct approval by co-opting regulations and concerns about labeling requirements. At this time, the FDA cannot require that food labels include information about production methods, such as genetic engineering, unless that process results in a material difference in the product.
The report, published by the Council for Agricultural Science and Technology, examines a proposal by the private firm AquaBounty to raise and sell genetically engineered salmon as a test case. The AquaAdvantage salmon carry a Chinook salmon gene, which enables them to grow to market size in half the time of conventional salmon.
The report, The Science and Regulation of Food from Genetically Engineered Animals, is available free of charge on the councils website at http://www.cast-science.org .
Provided by
UC Davis
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
What would stain as translucent on light-coloured fabric?
16 hours ago
-
How do I identify different bacteria on culture plates?
May 26, 2012
-
Why Do Dogs do Strange things...
May 25, 2012
-
What does exophillic and endophillic mean in terms of mosquito and their control?
May 24, 2012
-
Semen stains glows under black lights (uv light)?
May 23, 2012
-
Question on Human Chromosome 2
May 23, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Biology
More news stories
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
15 hours ago |
3.4 / 5 (16) |
41
More plant species responding to global warming than previously thought
(Phys.org) -- Far more wild plant species may be responding to global warming than previous large-scale estimates have suggested.
May 22, 2012 |
4.6 / 5 (14) |
18
|
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 26, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (4) |
7
For monogamous sparrows, it doesn't pay to stray (but they do it anyway)
It's quite common for a female song sparrow to stray from her breeding partner and mate with the male next door, but a new study shows that sleeping around can be costly.
May 22, 2012 |
5 / 5 (1) |
7
|
Study uncovers secret to speedy burrowing by razor clams
(Phys.org) -- If you look at a razor burrowing clam sitting in a bucket, youd never guess that it could burrow itself down into the soil, much less do it with any speed. Razor clams look like fat straws, ...
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say
(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives may do more harm ...
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Jun 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
As for animals we have already bred about as many species as there needs to be for species survival in terms of robustness and disease resistance but you crackpots think that playing god with species is necessary. Its not. It will never be appropriate or needed. The sole purpose for this extravagant waste of time and money (we have some serious climate problems which couyld use a buck or two to resolve them) is to insert a patent gene into every food commodity and therefore give the ownership of all food to the corporations who then dictate the price as they see fit. That is the truth behind the lies.
Jul 01, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
1. Destruction of habitat-- and with it the ancestral or wild relatives of our domestic crops and livestock which might have otherwise been valuable to natural breeders for conferring various desirable characteristics such as drought resistance, disease resistance, or some other particular aspect or characteristic.
2. Wholesale replacement of various "breeds" or strains of crops and livestock in the rush to create a consistant, more highly-marketable product based purely on consumer tastes and demands without regard for the longterm ability to maintain hybrid vigor by mixing the genetics of various un-related purebreed strains, as corporately marketed, homogeneous genetic lines drive the others from the market.