Astronomers reveal a cosmic 'axis of evil'

June 30, 2011

Astronomers reveal a cosmic 'axis of evil'

Enlarge

The Coma Cluster: A massive cluster of galaxies in the local Universe. Credit: NASA, ESA, and the Hubble Heritage Team (STScI/AURA). Acknowledgment: D. Carter (Liverpool John Moores University) and the Coma HST ACS Treasury Team

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers are puzzled by the announcement that the masses of the largest objects in the Universe appear to depend on which method is used to weigh them. The new work was presented at a specialist discussion meeting on 'Scaling Relations of Galaxy Clusters' organised by the Astrophysics Research Institute (ARI) at Liverpool John Moores University and supported by the Royal Astronomical Society.

Clusters of galaxies are the largest gravitationally bound objects in the Universe containing thousands of galaxies like the Milky Way and their weight is an important probe of their dark matter content and evolution through cosmic time. Measurements used to weigh these systems carried out in three different regions of the : X-ray, optical and millimetre wavelengths, give rise to significantly different results.

Eduardo Rozo, from the University of Chicago, explained that any two of the measurements can be made to fit easily enough but that always leaves the estimate using the third technique out of line. Dubbed the 'Axis of Evil', it is as if the Universe is being difficult by keeping back one or two pieces of the jigsaw and so deliberately preventing us from calibrating our weighing scales properly.

More than 40 of the leading cluster astronomers from UK, Europe and the US attended the meeting to discuss the early results from the Planck satellite, currently scanning the heavens at millimetre wavelengths, looking for the smallest signals from clusters of galaxies and the in order to understand the birth of the Universe. The Planck measurements were compared with of clusters from the Sloan Digitised Sky Survey and new X-ray observations from the satellite.

ARI astronomers are taking a leading role in this research through participation in the X-ray cluster work and observations of the constituent galaxies using the largest ground-based optical telescopes.

One possible resolution to the 'Axis of Evil' problem discussed at the meeting is a new population of clusters which is optically bright but also X-ray faint. Dr Jim Bartlett (Univ. Paris), who is one of the astronomers who presented the Planck results, argued that the prospect of a new cluster population which responds differently was a 'frightening prospect' because it overturns age old ideas about the gravitational physics being the same from cluster to cluster.

Chris Collins, LJMU Professor of Cosmology, who organised the meeting said: 'I saw this meeting as an opportunity to bring together experts who study clusters at only one wavelength and don't always talk to their colleagues working at other wavelengths. The results presented are unexpected and all three communities (optical, X-ray and millimetre) will need to work together in the future to figure out what is going on.'

Provided by Royal Astronomical Society search and more info website

4.8 /5 (17 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

kevinrtrs
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (19)
it is as if the Universe is being difficult by keeping back one or two pieces of the jigsaw and so deliberately preventing us from calibrating our weighing scales properly.

Ha! This is so funny! The problem stems from hanging on to the Big Bang theory and using the assumptions made there to try and fit in the actual observed data into a paradigm that's sick to the core. The more we get to see, the clearer it should be that it's time to create a new model. Most of the latest observations seem to be contradicting the bb model, yet nobody has the guts to speak out and say it's time to now bury the already dead horse. OK, it does sound a bit extreme but it's nevertheless true. The model just doesn't work.
FrankHerbert
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 2.8 / 5 (11)
Most of the latest observations seem to be contradicting the bb model


Examples please? How do you explain redshift?
seb
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 3.2 / 5 (10)
See this science paper on alternatives for redshift - http://www.newton...dex.html
lengould100
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 3.6 / 5 (8)
I'd guess that the so-called "dark matter" is a made-up fudge, and the problem lies with their use of the overly-simple Einstein equations of gravity.
FrankHerbert
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
See this science paper on alternatives for redshift - http://www.newton...dex.html


Thanks! I doubt I'll be convinced, but I will give it a whirl.
bluehigh
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1.9 / 5 (13)
Gee FrankHerbert, did you go see that with open mind or already doubting any possible change to your beliefs?

Supported by -
National Science and Engineering Research Council and
The Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics of
the National Research Council of Canada

and a whole host of substantial references.

Red Shift, the Big Bang(aka Creation) and Dark Matter are just BS masquerading as science because of mistaken intellectual investment.

Can I sue my Alma Marta for fraud?
bluehigh
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1.6 / 5 (14)
.. or maybe I can wander up to the Dean at Sydney Uni and ask - how come you did not tell me in lectures that these so called facts are just supposition? Can I get a refund on my fees.

* me looks at worthless MSc framed hanging above desk *

rawa1
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"dark matter" is a made-up fudge, and the problem lies with their use of the overly-simple Einstein equations of gravity
IMO the later explanation is correct, but the first one not. Could you recognize, why is it so?
Javinator
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Dr Jim Bartlett (Univ. Paris), who is one of the astronomers who presented the Planck results, argued that the prospect of a new cluster population which responds differently was a 'frightening prospect' because it overturns age old ideas about the gravitational physics being the same from cluster to cluster.


Now THAT is an interesting proposition.
kaasinees
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (10)
Most of the latest observations seem to be contradicting the bb model


Examples please? How do you explain redshift?

Show me how redshift supports expansion.
bluehigh
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1.3 / 5 (15)
... doesn't matter anyway. just tick a few multiple choice questions each week and write what they want to hear .. get some gov subsidy (i did) and anyone now is a scientist.

just toe the line and you to can have letters after your name like me.

which way to the money shower?
kshultz222_yahoo_com
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (4)
I am guessing that the big bang theory is headed in the right direction. It is dark matter/dark energy that I think will be totally debunked.
omatumr
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 1.3 / 5 (14)
Astronomers are puzzled, . . .

Red Shift, the Big Bang (aka Creation) and Dark Matter are just BS masquerading as science because of mistaken intellectual investment.


Nuclear rest mass data provide the answer [1,2].

1. "Neutron Repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages (2011)

http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1

2. "Is the Universe Expanding?", The Journal of Cosmology 13, 4187-4190 (2011)

http://journalofc...102.html

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
jamesrm
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
'I saw this meeting as an opportunity to bring together experts who study clusters at only one wavelength and don't always talk to their colleagues working at other wavelengths.

I thought that was the most telling line, specialsation gone mad, or are they all really operating on different wavelengths
Starbound
Jun 30, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Best... Title.... Ever....
Deesky
Jul 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Think of the amount of greenhouse gas emissions that wouldn't be released if all the cranks just stopped posting for a day.
brodix
Jul 01, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Another explanation for redshift:
http://www.fqxi.o...kets.pdf
Questionable
Jul 01, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Most of the latest observations seem to be contradicting the bb model


Examples please? How do you explain redshift?


The fact that the universe is flat. The need for an inflationary period immediately after the BB without ever explaining how and why it slow down or stopped. Even the cosmic background radiation has other explanations. There is only one thing that supports the BB theory, the observed red-shift. Maybe we should try and see if there is another explanation for that.

And NO, this has absolutly nothing to do with a creation theory!
Questionable
Jul 01, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Here is another classical physics explanation for the observed red-shift, pages 15 & 16.
http://www.scribd...-Physics
gwrede
Jul 03, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The problem with *not* supporting the Big Bang theory, is that then one should come up with an alternative story for how things got started.

And while many people have a problem with the BB, me included, no more plausible explanations seem to be around. Ask a few questions, and they shoot themself in the foot.
omatumr
Jul 03, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The problem with *not* supporting the Big Bang theory, is that then one should come up with an alternative story for how things got started.


Nor the biggest number in an infinite series!
Xob
Jul 04, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Brings to mind the idea in the very tiny quantum world where you'd like to be able to know both speed and position at the same time but you can't know both at the same time, only one or the other. Its amusing to read this and imagine that at the extreme other end in terms of size, the biggest things out there pulls a similar kind of trick in that you want to be able to make three measurements at the same time but can only know two of the measurments at any one time while the desired third measurement changes if you know the other two.

Funny. I wonder what they will find is the real answer to this problem of measuring the very large. Will be interesting to see.
Jordian1
Jul 12, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Isn't this seen in the quantum world? What you use to measure a molecule entirely changes the measurement you'll get. Could the same thing be happening here?
Rank 4.8 /5 (17 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
    createdMay 19, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51

Kyoto Protocol architect 'frustrated' by climate dialogue

UN climate talks are going nowhere, as politicians dither or bicker while the pace of warming dangerously speeds up, one of the architects of the Kyoto Protocol told AFP.

Space & Earth / Environment

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 3.7 / 5 (7) | comments 39

Aliens don't want to eat us, says former SETI director

Alien life probably isn’t interested in having us for dinner, enslaving us or laying eggs in our bellies, according to a recent statement by former SETI director Jill Tarter.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (13) | comments 37

Dragon arrives at space station in historic 1st (Update 2)

The privately bankrolled Dragon capsule made a historic arrival at the International Space Station on Friday, triumphantly captured by astronauts wielding a giant robot arm.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (10) | comments 19

What's the big deal about private space launches?

(AP) -- The first private spaceship is headed to the International Space Station. Some questions and answers about the cargo mission by Space Exploration Technologies, known as SpaceX:

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (6) | comments 32


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend

(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.

Social welfare cuts ultimately come with heavy price, researchers say

(Phys.org) -- Slashing government funding for Medicaid, food stamps and other programs that serve the poor – while politically popular with some lawmakers and many conservatives – may do more harm ...