White House unveils global cyberspace strategy

May 16, 2011 by Chris Lefkow
Analyists work at the National Cybersecurity & Communications Integration Center in Arlington, Virginia in 2010. The White House unveiled a set of policy proposals Monday for international cooperation in ensuring an open and secure Internet.

The White House unveiled a set of policy proposals Monday for international cooperation in ensuring an open and secure Internet.

"Together, we can work together to build a future for cyberspace that is open, interoperable, secure, and reliable," US President Barack Obama wrote in an introduction to the 25-page "International Strategy for Cyberspace."

Obama, who has made cybersecurity a top priority along with diplomatic engagement, wrote that the document "outlines not only a vision for the future of cyberspace but an agenda for realizing it.

"It provides the context for our partners at home and abroad to understand our priorities and how we can come together to preserve the character of cyberspace and reduce the threats we face," he wrote.

The policy document is short on specifics but provides goals and a framework for international cooperation in promoting the US vision for cyberspace in what it called seven priority areas.

Obama did not personally attend the unveiling of the document but the event drew top members of his cabinet including Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, Attorney General Eric Holder and Commerce Secretary Gary Locke.

White House cybersecurity coordinator Howard Schmidt, Deputy Defense Secretary William Lynn and Obama's counter-terrorism chief, John Brennan, also addressed the gathering, attended by diplomats and leaders of private industry.

Schmidt said the document explains "what the US stands for internationally in cyberspace, and how we plan to build prosperity, enhance security, and safeguard openness in our increasingly networked world."

Clinton said the strategy hinges on seven key policy priorities including promoting Internet freedom and economic engagement to encourage innovation and trade while safeguarding intellectual property.

"We want to do more together to protect privacy and secure fundamental freedoms of expression, assembly, and association, online as we do offline," she said.

Other priorities include enhancing the ability of law enforcement to respond to cybercrime and military cooperation to "help our alliances do more together to confront cyber threats," Clinton said.

"It is not a series of prescriptions," she said. "There is no one-size-fits-all, straightforward route to that goal.

James Lewis, a cybersecurity expert at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, said the policy paper was not a "particularly bold document" but was a good first step.

"It's a continuation of the Obama national security strategy that says the US will engage with people and try to work with them," he said. "So saying the United States wants to engage and here's what we'd like to achieve -- an Internet that's open and stable and secure -- that's a good thing."

The White House document also calls for a robust response to cyber threats.

Lynn, the deputy defense secretary, said Pentagon networks "are probed millions of times a day and more than 100 foreign intelligence agencies have tried to penetrate our networks or those of our industrial partners."

"When warranted, the United States will respond to hostile acts in cyberspace as we would to any other threat to our country," the White House said in a fact-sheet.

"We reserve the right to use all necessary means -- diplomatic, informational, military, and economic -- as appropriate and consistent with applicable international law, in order to defend our nation, our allies, our partners, and our interests," it said.

Dean Garfield, president and chief executive of the Information Technology Industry Council, welcomed the White House initiative.

"A growing number of governments worldwide are enacting cybersecurity-related laws, regulations, and other requirements that are inconsistent with generally accepted norms and standards," Garfield said.

"This growing policy patchwork not only results in decreased security for nations, but also disrupts global commerce and ignores the borderless nature of the Internet.

"To date, the international community has lacked the collective willingness to engage in a meaningful conversation on the need for a global approach," he said. "US leadership is critical to reaching a consensus solution."

Explore further: Most internet anonymity software leaks users' details

Related Stories

US reviewing ways to fight cyber attacks: general

Sep 24, 2010

The White House is looking at boosting the authority of the US military and other agencies to protect the country's infrastructure from possible cyber attack, a top general said Thursday.

Recommended for you

Most internet anonymity software leaks users' details

5 hours ago

Virtual Private Networks (VPNs) are legal and increasingly popular for individuals wanting to circumvent censorship, avoid mass surveillance or access geographically limited services like Netflix and BBC ...

WikiLeaks says NSA spied on French business

6 hours ago

WikiLeaks has released documents that it says show that the U.S. National Security Agency eavesdropped on France's top finance officials and high-stakes French export bids over a decade in what the group called targeted economic ...

Google gets extended deadline to answer EU case

8 hours ago

Brussels has given Google an extension until mid-August to answer an anti-trust case alleging that the tech giant abuses its search engine's market dominance, a company spokesman said Monday.

Facebook opens first Africa office

11 hours ago

Facebook announced Monday it had opened its first African office in Johannesburg as part of its efforts "to help people and businesses connect" on the continent.

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

5 / 5 (3) May 16, 2011
Why does the United States continue to think it owns the internet? It will continue to grow and evolve with the people and technologies that have always driven it and a wad of text will do little to help in a boarderless realm riddled with machine and human error. The best way to be secure on the internet is to understand that it is not at all secure and work from their with your own personal or professional needs. There is no internet safety blanket. Not in text and not on a chip.
not rated yet May 16, 2011
It's very correct."To date, the international community has lacked the collective willingness to engage in a meaningful conversation on the need for a global approach," he said. "US leadership is critical to reaching a consensus solution."
5 / 5 (3) May 16, 2011
so now that the federal government has fixed the economy, secured the borders, made peace in the middle east, fixed U.S. health care and made public schools miraculously effective/efficient it will now proceed to make sure the Internet "is open, interoperable, secure, and reliable".

i guess we can interpret this to mean the Internet should be "open (available only to those who comply with federal standards), interoperable (works only with the software vendors who contribute the most money to right politicians' campaigns), secure (open to snooping by federal authorities who keep everyone safe and sound), and reliable (forcing huge taxpayer investements in the software/hardware of their choice, since they know what's best for all of us)"

not rated yet May 17, 2011
Why does the United States continue to think it owns the internet?

Because it practically controls the IANA and the ICANN.

If you "break" those two organizations, the WWW will fall into a chaos and most of it stops working, and new service providers can't join the network because there's no control of IP adress ranges. Old service providers also start to get into conflicts because there's nobody to say who gets to use what numbers.

You get routing anarchy and the whole internet breaks into smaller networks that cannot communicate because programs are written to assume static and unique IP adresses for different parts of the internet.

The internet was originally intended to have none of this central control, but someone saw it fit to impose us with IPv4 and subsequently IPv6 so that the internet could not really do away without central authority.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.