Once thought a rival phase, antiferromagnetism coexists with superconductivity

May 23, 2011

High-temperature superconductivity can be looked at as a fight for survival at the atomic scale. In an effort to reach that point where electrons pair up and resistance is reduced to zero, superconductivity must compete with numerous, seemingly rival phases of matter.

Understanding those phases and whether or not they are rivals or complementary phenomena has consumed the attention of theoreticians and experimentalists in the quest to find capable of functioning at close-to-room temperature, a potential that has gone unrealized for nearly three decades.

One of those phases, antiferromagnetism (AFM), shows evidence of co-existing with superconductivity under examination by two high-tech procedures for measuring the activity of and , an international team of physicists report in the current edition of the journal .

The findings add further evidence to the team's earlier discovery that spin excitations – the dynamic harmonic oscillations of the magnetic moments associated with subatomic particles like electrons – play a crucial role in superconductivity, said lead author and Boston College Associate Professor of Physics Vidya Madhavan.

The team – including researchers from Boston College, Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Oak Ridge National Laboratory and the University of Tennessee, – used neutron scattering and scanning tunneling microscopy to determine the interplay between AFM and superconductivity.

In certain solids, antiferromagnetism exists when adjacent ions – each bearing a small magnet called a 'spin' – line up in opposite directions throughout the material, neutralizing its magnetic force. Essentially, the magnetic atoms or ions pointed in one direction cancel out the magnetic atoms or ions pointing in the opposite direction.

Madhavan said all high temperature superconductors are close to the AFM phase. But it has been thought that AFM disappears, giving way to the emergence of superconductivity.

But tests on a copper oxide doped with additional electrons displayed activity that runs counter to the theory that the phases exclude each other, said Madhavan. Instead, AFM remains as superconductivity is reached in the high-temperature superconductor.

"The two phases actually compete and co-exist," said Madhavan. The neutron scattering and scanning tunneling microscopy revealed spin excitations in both modes – AFM and superconductivity. While can directly probe spin excitations, STM can identify the behavior of the electrons. Together, the evidence shows spin excitations in the electronic spectrum, which signals that electron coupling is taking place.

The experimental evidence is crucial to better understanding superconductivity, Madhavan said.

"These strongly correlated materials are very hard to handle from a theoretical standpoint because there are so many possibilities," said Madhavan. "In this field we need to really understand these materials experimentally because theory is very difficult to do."

This experimental work gives additional evidence that spin excitations are critical to , Madhavan said, "and it gives us a deeper understanding of the interplay between various phases."

Explore further: Superconductivity could form at high temperatures in layered 2D crystals

Related Stories

Stripes 'play key role' in superconductivity

Mar 21, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Fluctuating magnetic stripes could be the cause of the mysterious hourglass-shaped magnetic spectrum found in high temperature superconductors, according to new research.

Quantum fluctuations are key in superconductors

Jan 08, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- New experiments on a recently discovered class of iron-based superconductors suggest that the ability of their electrons to conduct electricity without resistance is directly connected with the magnetic properties ...

Recommended for you

Physicists discuss quantum pigeonhole principle

Jul 26, 2014

The pigeonhole principle: "If you put three pigeons in two pigeonholes at least two of the pigeons end up in the same hole." So where's the argument? Physicists say there is an important argument. While the ...

First in-situ images of void collapse in explosives

Jul 25, 2014

While creating the first-ever images of explosives using an x-ray free electron laser in California, Los Alamos researchers and collaborators demonstrated a crucial diagnostic for studying how voids affect ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

El_Nose
not rated yet May 24, 2011
each bearing a small magnet called a 'spin'


wait -- is spin which i always equated to angular momentum of particles within an atom also equal to magnetism ??? so spin is magnetism?
TomSullivan
1 / 5 (1) Jun 14, 2011
As the atoms are brought within a certain distance from each other due to cooling or the molecular structure of the material constructing the lattice, the electron orbits may become opposingly synchronized due to their repulsion of each other, thus seeming to be paired. It may be that the radius of the electron orbits in a superconductor becomes equal to the distance between nuclei, thus allowing for easy transfer of an electron's orbit to adjacent nuclei in the lattice. The lower temperatures may also reduce the size and frequency of the MMbits holding the electron in orbit as predicted by Rip Theory. With the MMbits size and frequency minimized, electrons will more readily and more easily transfer their orbit to the adjacent nuclei within the lattice. © Copyright 2010 Thomas A Sullivan
TomSullivan
1 / 5 (1) Jun 14, 2011
As the atoms are brought within a certain distance from each other due to cooling or molecular structure of the material constructing the lattice, the electron orbits may become opposingly synchronized due to their repulsion of each other, thus seeming to be paired. As the radius of the electron orbits in a superconductor becomes equal to the distance between nuclei, an electron's orbit is more easily transfered to adjacent nuclei in the lattice. The lower temperatures may also reduce the size and frequency of the MMbits holding the electron in orbit as predicted by Rip Theory. With the MMbits size and frequency minimized, electrons will more readily and more easily transfer their orbit to the adjacent nuclei within the lattice.
© Copyright 2010 Thomas A Sullivan