Testing technicolor physics

May 06, 2011 By Aaron Dubrow
An example of simulated data modeled for the Compact Muon Solenoid (CMS) particle detector on the Large Hadron Collider. Here, following a collision of two protons, a Higgs boson is produced which decays into two jets of hadrons and two electrons. DeGrand's theories represent an alternative to the standard model. Credit: TACC

(PhysOrg.com) -- As the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) ramps up the rate and impact of its collisions, physicists hope to witness the emergence of the Higgs boson, an anticipated, but as-yet-unseen, fundamental particle that scientists believe gives mass to matter.

The is a central component of the "standard model," a theory that defines the relationships between the forces of the universe. But, what if the Higgs boson is not a fundamental particle, but rather a bound state of new particles that have not yet been seen?

"From the beginning of the standard model, people have been unhappy with the idea that the Higgs boson is a fundamental particle," said Thomas DeGrand, professor of physics at the University of Colorado.

Scientists who advocate alternative models of particle physics are motivated by the theory of superconductivity. The , which is very different from ordinary matter, is not characterized by new particles, but by Cooper pairs--bound states of .

The standard model of particle physics suggests that the and we're familiar with, that comprise the nuclei of atoms, are made up of combinations of different types of elementary particles called quarks and gluons. We cannot see these particles in isolation because a fundamental force called "the strong interaction" holds them firmly together, but experiments lead physicists to believe these quarks come in three varieties, each with different properties, or "colors".

No one knows why the particle content of the standard model is what it is. A logical possibility exists that there could be more kinds of quarks and gluons with different numbers of colors, strongly interacting with each other. Collectively, these possibilities are known as technicolor theories.

DeGrand spent many years studying the theory behind the interactions of quarks and gluons, known as (QCD), before he turned his attention to technicolor theories. He is the co-author of one of the standard books in the field.

However, QCD does not describe all aspects of the standard model, especially the nature of "final" undiscovered particles. The construction of the LHC, and the sense that new knowledge was waiting around the corner, drew DeGrand to explorations of alternative particle theories.

"I became a little tired of lattice QCD," DeGrand said. "The technicolor theories held more interesting questions."

Within the last five years, scientists realized that many of the computational techniques that had been invented for QCD could be applied technicolor theories as well. In 2008, two colleagues from Tel Aviv University, Yigal Shamir and Benjamin Svetitsky, invited DeGrand to join their research team. Applying the same methodology DeGrand helped perfect for QCD, the team began simulating technicolor candidate theories and drawing conclusions from the odd outcomes of these simulated worlds.

Above is a map of technicolor particle theories that Thomas DeGrand studies. The axes represent (horizontal) the number of colors and (vertical) the number of flavors of quarks. The different colors describe different kinds of color structure for the quarks. The shaded bands are where theorists (D. Dietrich and F. Sannino) predict that there are "unparticle" theories. Credit: Physical Review D75, 085018 (2007)

To calculate the interactions of new kinds of quarks and gluons in various configurations on lattices of giant grids, the team used the National Science Foundation (NSF)-funded Ranger supercomputer--one of the largest in the world--located at the Texas Advanced Computing Center. In the numerical simulations, the grids are housed (virtually) in boxes of various sizes and the reaction of the particles to the box size provides information about the energy characteristics of the system.

"This is not something an experimentalist can do," DeGrand said. "But as theorists, we can invent these fake worlds where the system sits in a specific sized box, and we can measure the strength of the quark-gluon interactions in large boxes, medium boxes and small boxes to see how it changes. Changing the energy or momentum scales is related to changing the physical size of the system."

Supercomputing plays a pivotal role in this process, which involves solving complex quantum equations for a large number of particles. Over the last two years, DeGrand and his colleagues have used nearly three million processing hours on Ranger (the equivalent of 340 years on a single processor) to simulate new particles comprised of quarks with two colors and three colors, respectively. The simulations help characterize the new particles and determine whether they are candidates for beyond-the-standard-model physics.

The Ranger simulations revealed that the simplest technicolor models, with two colors, have properties that are very different from a conventional particle system. Professor H. Georgi of Harvard University coined the name "unparticle theory" to describe such systems.

The three-color system was a bit more mysterious. The researchers couldn't tell if it was a particle theory or an unparticle theory. However, the simulations clearly didn't represent a viable real-world scenario. For a technicolor theory to be a feasible candidate for new physics, it must exhibit unusual behavior to avoid conflict with the constraints defined by present-day experimental knowledge. The three-color system didn't satisfy these criteria. The researchers are currently continuing their map of possible particle models by simulating four-color quark systems.

"The idea that the Higgs mechanism could be caused by the strong interactions of still-to-be-discovered has been with us for some time, but until recently, it has been difficult to test this idea for lack of adequate computing resources," said Carlton DeTar, a longtime collaborator from the University of Utah not involved in the current research. "DeGrand and his collaborators are among the foremost groups in the world using powerful numerical simulations to investigate this exciting alternative. The results could have profound implications for the search for the Higgs particle at the Large Hadron Collider in Europe."

Just as Salvador Dali's surreal paintings reveal taken-for-granted aspects of our material world, the alternative technicolor theories have intellectual value. They teach us about particle theories by placing them in a larger context.

For DeGrand, the stretching of the mind is what matters most--that, and the adventure of discovering something truly novel.

"It's high-risk, high-reward research," DeGrand said.

But, if he and his colleagues find a viable alternative to the , it could drive the next theory of everything.

The work was also supported by the U.S. Department of Energy. Additional computations were done on facilities of the USQCD Collaboration at Fermilab, which are funded by the Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy.

Explore further: The unifying framework of symmetry reveals properties of a broad range of physical systems

Related Stories

Is the Vacuum Empty? -- the Higgs Field and the Dark Energy

May 10, 2007

The problems in understanding the true nature of the “vacuum” of space were discussed by theoretical physicist Alvaro de Rújula from CERN (the European Council for Nuclear Research) in Geneva, Switzerland, and a professor ...

Michigan integral to world's largest physics experiment

Sep 05, 2008

After 20 years of construction, a machine that could either verify or nullify the prevailing theory of particle physics is about to begin its mission. CERN's epic Large Hadron Collider (LHC) project currently involves 25 ...

Glasgow scientists predict mass of new particle

Jan 26, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- A team of physicists from the University of Glasgow has predicted the mass of a new particle which would help explain one of the fundamental forces of the universe.

The hunt for the Higgs steps up a gear

Aug 28, 2008

The hunt for the Higgs boson, the most highly sought-after particle in physics, received a boost this month with the release of two new results from the Tevatron particle collider at the US Department of Energy's ...

Recommended for you

What time is it in the universe?

19 hours ago

Flavor Flav knows what time it is. At least he does for Flavor Flav. Even with all his moving and accelerating, with the planet, the solar system, getting on planes, taking elevators, and perhaps even some ...

Watching the structure of glass under pressure

Aug 28, 2014

Glass has many applications that call for different properties, such as resistance to thermal shock or to chemically harsh environments. Glassmakers commonly use additives such as boron oxide to tweak these ...

Inter-dependent networks stress test

Aug 28, 2014

Energy production systems are good examples of complex systems. Their infrastructure equipment requires ancillary sub-systems structured like a network—including water for cooling, transport to supply fuel, and ICT systems ...

Explainer: How does our sun shine?

Aug 28, 2014

What makes our sun shine has been a mystery for most of human history. Given our sun is a star and stars are suns, explaining the source of the sun's energy would help us understand why stars shine. ...

User comments : 12

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Turritopsis
1 / 5 (8) May 06, 2011
Mass is a Higgs field distortion it is accentuated with electromagnetic energy, without the energy it is dark mass (like a black hole). Energy operates in deviation, plus or minus charge, light is neutrally charged therefore no interference, electron or positron have negative or positive charge respectively, therefore Higgs field interference, electron has negative curvature only therefore the spin drags, faux mass (inverse for positron). Decay is resultant of drag, light is timeless, matter drags and decays. Time is measured in decay. Degradation is present therefore it is understood that higher (ones from which we deviate) and lower (ones we spawn) dimensions exist. Dark matter is matter irrelative to us. Too big or too small to play a role in our verse.
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (8) May 06, 2011
Finding the Higgs boson is an impossibility, the energy levels need to be relativistically infinite. We need matter to move at light speed. In a supernova matter reaches infinite speeds through aid of other matter. The push from the infalling matter causes matter in the middle of the star to reach light speed producing infinite energy and infinite electromagnetic dispersion, gamma radiation. The LHC though is armed with the fastest capture speeds ever before present. There is hope that a fleeting glimpse of a miniature blackhole will be caught.
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (5) May 06, 2011
By infinite I mean relativistically infinite, upper limit.
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (8) May 06, 2011
But is it even possible using protons? Protons are comprised of 3 smaller constituents, and those three constituents could be comprised of more constituents deviating at alternate energies. The factors are mind boggling. The LHC is powerful but it is a brute machine, a reconfiguration is required to better simulate supernova type mechanics. The detectors need added force enducers to force mergence. The protons need to have a singular mergence point for their trajectory. By timing a pulse blast at time of collision proton collisions could become pure, gamma burst with massive remainder.
Johannes414
1 / 5 (8) May 07, 2011
By the Word of the Lord were the heavens made.
Wilhelmus
1 / 5 (3) May 08, 2011
Reality is not dependant of so called Higgs Bosons, for scientists maybe the God-Particle, this says everyting, don't think of God but like a God (Einstein)
hemitite
not rated yet May 09, 2011
Then there's the Higgs Bison which is thought to be responsible for the increasing mass of beef eaters.
vacuum-mechanics
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2011
Could anyone explain why some particles have no mass (and have to get mass from Higgs field)?
hemitite
not rated yet May 10, 2011
VM,

From what I understand, the mass of a particle is (according to the Standard Model) generated by its interaction with the Higgs field that is mediated by the Higgs Boson. Particles that have no mass, such as photons, are not effected by that field.
Johannes414
1 / 5 (3) May 10, 2011
Some particles have mass because God created them that way.
vacuum-mechanics
1 / 5 (1) May 10, 2011


From what I understand, the mass of a particle is (according to the Standard Model) generated by its interaction with the Higgs field that is mediated by the Higgs Boson. Particles that have no mass, such as photons, are not effected by that field.


How Higgs field give mass to particles?
Turritopsis
1 / 5 (2) May 10, 2011
Light is quantized to photons, light is not a particle but a wave, particles are deviations of neutrality. A light wave has positive then negative curvature, an electron has only half of the wave, it rotates in on it self, creating a Higgs field distortion within the electrons space, the Higgs boson, the charge in space creates the Higgs boson, when the charge disperses the Higgs boson disappears. Mass is created by charge, up quarks are charged, down quarks are charged, although the neutron is collectively neutrally charged the individual constituents aren't. Particles have charge, they are a point in space-time. Light is neutrally charged but is the electromagnetic energy carrier, light divides and merges into negative and positive charge, electron and positron respectively.

Charge in the Higgs field creates mass. A Higgs field distortion is the Higgs boson. To prove the theory we must blow away charge and capture a fleeting glimpse of the naked boson before it disappear