Low probability disaster scenarios deserve more attention

May 27, 2011 By Neil Schoenherr

Hazards with horrific outcomes — like the disaster at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan — are not only difficult to contemplate but are also challenging to plan for financially. Especially when the odds of them happening are incredibly low, says Stuart I. Greenbaum, management expert at Olin Business School, Washington University in St. Louis.

Recent natural disasters around the world have focused attention on the methods and processes used by organizations to manage risk known as Enterprise Risk Management (ERM).

Greenbaum recently told a conference in France that low probability disaster scenarios are among the risks that tend to be overlooked by business, but deserve more attention and planning.

Greenbaum was plenary speaker May 17 in Lille, France at Enterprise Risk Management and Corporate Governance for Insurance Firms, a conference sponsored by the International Center for Financial Regulation and EDHEC Business School. Greenbaum is Bank of America Professor Emeritus of Managerial Leadership at Olin Business School.

Obviously, even the most ardent ERM program could not have prevented the earthquake or the resulting tsunami in Japan, says Greenbaum. But businesses must consider all potential disasters and risks inherent to their operations.

“Herein lies the behavioral side of ERM and the most basic motivation for formalizing the management of enterprise risk,” he says. “ERM is a process, and effective ERM is all about process integrity. Thus, we can think of ERM as protection against the inclination to ignore those risks that are most menacing and inchoate. ERM elevates vigilance and thereby reduces the probability of calamitous events. But, it does more, much more.”

“Calamities are inescapable, but their costs are not altogether foreordained,” Greenbaum says. “ERM reduces both direct and indirect costs of untoward events. Typically, for financial institutions, calamities, especially those owing to moral hazards, are accompanied by regulatory sanctions and class-action lawsuits. The best protection against such knock-on effects is a credible ERM program. Well-documented and thoughtfully structured processes for managing existential risks will be the most disarming response to the inevitable question of what was done to protect the organization against enterprise risk.”

ERM is a process, Greenbaum says, but is also a frame of mind. “It is a collective assertion that the organization will bring its best talents to bear upon the challenge of avoiding surprises that threaten sustainability,” he says. “It will consciously and judiciously forego current earnings in order to reduce the probability and severity of existential hazards.

“ERM can never eliminate disastrous outcomes, only those of our own making,” Greenbaum says.

Explore further: Less-numerate investors swayed by corporate report presentation effects

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Technology can protect water supply

Jan 07, 2005

A technology to instantly determine a poisoned water supply system has been developed at the Department of Energy's Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Researcher Eli Greenbaum said the AquaSentinel system can detect toxins in ...

Winning lottery strategy proposed by professor

Jan 10, 2011

The record-breaking $380 million Mega Millions multistate lottery jackpot drawing this week had two winners and may inspire more people to take a chance on being a millionaire.

Engineering a better future

Apr 19, 2011

On the night of June 20, 1990, 8-year-old Behrouz Shafei was up late watching soccer on TV when his world suddenly convulsed. A 7.4 magnitude earthquake centered some 150 miles from his home in Tehran claimed ...

Recommended for you

Migrant employment on the rise

Oct 20, 2014

Skilled migrants are enjoying better jobs and higher levels of employment thanks to a shift in policy, according to a new study by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research at the University ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rmark
not rated yet May 28, 2011

Science 16 September 1977:
Vol. 197 no. 4309 pp. 1160-1162

Disasters as a Necessary Part of Benefit-Cost Analyses

R. K. Mark and
D. E. Stuart-Alexander
Edwardo
not rated yet May 30, 2011
Indeed, low probability high consequence events are difficult to deal with. Let's hope at least that the authors have read "Black Swan" and learned about fat tails. The world is not "normal": extreme events are hugely more likely than predicted by bell curves.