US privacy groups welcome 'Do Not Track' bill

May 09, 2011

Privacy and consumer groups welcomed a "Do Not Track" bill introduced in the US Senate on Monday that would let Internet users block companies from gathering information about their online activities.

The Do-Not-Track Online Act of 2011 was introduced by Democratic Senator Jay Rockefeller of West Virginia, the chairman of the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.

"Recent reports of privacy invasions have made it imperative that we do more to put consumers in the driver's seat when it comes to their personal information," Rockefeller said in a statement.

"Consumers have a right to decide whether their information can be collected and used online," he said. "This bill offers a simple, straightforward way for people to stop companies from tracking their movements online."

Rockefeller's bill would create a "legal obligation" for online companies to honor the choice of consumers who say they do not want to be tracked online and give the Federal Trade Commission the power to pursue any company that does not honor the request.

Rockefeller's bill comes amid a flurry of privacy legislation in the US Congress and on the local-state level.

US senators John Kerry and John McCain unveiled an online privacy bill last month and two members of the US House of Representatives released a draft last week of a separate "Do Not Track" bill aimed at protecting children online.

"Do Not Track" legislation has also been introduced in the California state senate, drawing criticism from some companies reliant on tracking Web users for targeted advertising.

Rockefeller's bill was welcomed on Monday by the American Civil Liberties Union, Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Consumer Watchdog, Consumer Action, and the Center for Digital Democracy.

Susan Grant of the Consumer Federation of America said it would "give Americans the right and the right tools to browse the Internet without their every click being tracked for marketing and other purposes."

"The current model creates an economic incentive for tracking and if consumers don't have the ability to 'opt-out' the result is going to be a detailed portrait of our online activities," said Chris Calabrese of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Jeffrey Chester of the Center for Digital Democracy said the bill strikes a balance between protecting the personal information of Web users and the needs of businesses to conduct electronic commerce.

"The bill shows that you can protect privacy and also promote e-commerce because it allows websites to engage in the necessary data collection so they can generate robust revenues," Chester said.

Jamie Court of Consumer Watchdog noted that Mozilla, Microsoft and Apple are incorporating a mechanism into their Web browsers to send a "Do Not Track" message but there is currently no legal requirement that a website honor the request.

Court also welcomed provisions in the Rockefeller bill that would apply "Do Not Track" standards to mobile devices.

Apple and Google are to attend a congressional hearing on privacy on Tuesday following controversy over location-sharing features on the iPhone and Google's Android devices.

Explore further: Protecting infrastructure with smarter CPS

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US lawmakers plan 'Do Not Track' bills (Update)

May 06, 2011

US lawmakers announced plans on Friday to introduce "Do Not Track" legislation that would let Internet users block companies from gathering information about their online activities.

US senators introduce online privacy 'bill of rights'

Apr 12, 2011

US senators John Kerry and John McCain introduced an online privacy bill Tuesday that seeks to strike a balance between protecting the personal information of Web users and the needs of businesses to conduct ...

US lawmaker unveils Internet, finance privacy bills

Feb 12, 2011

Cheered on by civil liberties advocates and consumer groups, a US lawmaker introduced legislation Friday to help safeguard Internet users' privacy and rein in dissemination of personal financial data.

New report calls for online privacy bill of rights

Dec 16, 2010

(AP) -- The Commerce Department is calling for the creation of a "privacy bill of rights" for Internet users to set ground rules for companies that collect consumer data online and use that information for marketing and ...

Google, FTC reach Google Buzz privacy settlement

Mar 30, 2011

The Federal Trade Commission reached a settlement with Google on Wednesday over Google Buzz, the social networking tool rolled out last year which spawned a slew of privacy complaints.

Recommended for you

Protecting infrastructure with smarter CPS

6 hours ago

Security of IT networks is continually being improved to protect against malicious hackers. Yet when IT networks interface with infrastructures such as water and electric systems to provide monitoring and control capabilities, ...

Apple helps iTunes users delete free U2 album

20 hours ago

Apple on Monday began helping people boot U2 off their iTunes accounts after a cacophony of complaints about not wanting the automatically downloaded free album by the Irish rock band.

Habitual Facebook users: Suckers for social media scams?

Sep 15, 2014

A new study finds that habitual use of Facebook makes individuals susceptible to social media phishing attacks by criminals, likely because they automatically respond to requests without considering how they are connected ...

YouTube to go offline in India on Android phones

Sep 15, 2014

YouTube users in India will soon be able to save videos from the Google-owned service, making it possible to watch them offline, and the feature will eventually be available globally, the company said Monday.

Facebook vs. loneliness

Sep 15, 2014

Are people becoming lonelier even as they feel more connected online? Hayeon Song, an assistant professor of communication at UWM, explored this topic in recent research.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet May 09, 2011
Thing is, it's unenforceable anyway.

Google's ads not only track you, they run an a.i. to try to determine ads related to websites or products you viewed in the past.

If a website, plug-in, app, or device is put out by a company over seas, in many cases it will not be possible for the U.S. government to legally enforce.

Wundergrounddotcome will be forced to close, I think, because his website steals information about it's users, both from their posts and directly from their computers, and sells it to advertisers.

I once mentioned in a blog on that site that I happened to have a headache. Even though my contact informaton was private, within a minute of making the post, I got a telephone call from some headache specialist clinic halfway across the country.

Basicly, all of the major applications and plugins have spyware in them, and I'm talking primary vendors: Google, Microsoft, Apple; not third party software. All of them have trojan spywares in their products.
poof
1 / 5 (2) May 09, 2011
^ paranoid android.

Stop surfing all those tranny porn sites on IE and you'll be fine.
Skepticus
not rated yet May 10, 2011
You send a command request to the servers to "opt out". The servers have to remember this choice by storing data. Then the list of persons who opted out can be given to the authority for likely illegal activities..neat.
The only solution is to surf EVERYWHERE, whether manually or by automation, so no patterns can be found and judged.