9/11 produced permanent shift to Republican party among new young US voters, research says

May 25, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Research led by the University of Warwick’s Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy has found that not only did the events of 9/11 produce an immediate shift in favour of the Republican party among new young US voters but that shift persisted into later years. The research shows that party strategists should focus on winning over voters when they are young.

The researchers, Professor Sharun Mukand, from the University of Warwick, and Professor Ethan Kaplan, from Stockholm University and the University of Maryland, looked at whether the mere act of registering for a political party today can affect future politics by causing enduring support for that party. Their results clearly show that the decision to register with a political party today can have effects that last for years, perhaps even for a lifetime.

The researchers examined the political affiliations of a group of first-time voters in California who registered to vote when they became eligible, at age 18. Because of slight differences in their birthdates, these voters registered just before and just after the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001. The attacks caused a nationwide political shift toward the right, as George W. Bush’s emphasis on the war on terror and homeland security boosted his public approval ratings to the peak of his presidency.

The results of their analysis are striking. Two basically identical groups of people take up markedly different political agendas. They find that voters with birthdays in September were more likely to register as Republicans than voters with birthdays in August – by more than two percentage points. The political affiliation of these voters persisted through tp the year 2008 - with those born in September consistently remaining two percent more likely to be Republican. This was true even for those voters who moved and, thus, had to change their registration."

This research may explain why politically partisan realignments happen very slowly. When President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Civil Rights act in 1964, he said that his Democratic Party had “lost the South for a generation.” In fact, the loss took a generation to take place. Clear, persistent support for the among Southern whites only emerged in 1994.

Professor Sharun Mukand from the University of Warwick said:

“Our research shows that party strategists should focus on winning over voters when they are young. However our findings have important implications for the political arena and for public policies. Policies may persist simply because support for a party endures. In particular, if voters are unwilling to shift political allegiance in response to new, politically relevant information, then policies out of tune with changing times may live on.”

The researchers note that 9/11 is not the only moment in the last decade of US politics which had a significant impact on young voters.

Professor Ethan Kaplan said: “Consider the implications of our findings when applied to the 2008 U.S. election. In this election, according to Pew Research Center, two third of voters ages 18-29 voted for Obama in 2008. This compares to 53 percent of the general population. Our analysis suggests that this gap between the Obama “youth voters” and the general population is remarkably persistent over several election cycles. Indeed, our calculations suggest that the 2008 youth vote gap will be a phenomenon affecting US elections for decades to come.”

Explore further: Can Qatar rise to the challenge and accommodate alcohol at the 2022 Football World Cup?

More information: The full paper can be found at: bit.ly/j71A27

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Which politicians do voters blame for the down economy?

Aug 17, 2010

A down economy usually spells trouble for incumbents, but a new Brigham Young University study shows that six Republicans up for re-election this year caught a break when John McCain lost the last presidential election.

Are women voters more likely to vote for female candidates?

Mar 31, 2008

The research, conducted by University of Wisconsin’s Kathleen Dolan, examined the National Election Study (NES) data, which provided information about voters’ reactions to female candidates and whether gender affinity ...

Recommended for you

Poverty rate drops for the first time since 2006

16 hours ago

The poverty rate in the United States has dropped for the first time since 2006, bringing a bit of encouraging news about the nation's economy as President Barack Obama and Congress gear up for the November elections.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

rwinners
not rated yet May 26, 2011
Two observations: Youth is more effected by massive tragedy and becomes more nationalistic when the nation is attacked.
Youth is also more able to change political direction that us older folks.
Good for them!
COCO
1 / 5 (2) May 26, 2011
wonder how the shift would/will be when a real investigation of the 911 events point to an inside job. THese remain young sheeple - perhaps eweth would be a better term.