Obama's election reduced perceptions of racism, but boosted opposition to race-related policies

May 27, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Many Americans changed their perceptions of discrimination and racism after Barack Obama became the nation's first black president.

This belief that racial biases had softened, however, did not translate to about policies that address , according to a new University of Michigan study. In fact, opposition to affirmative action and immigration may have increased since 2008.

"When racial progress is made, and perceived, by many Americans from a variety of racial backgrounds, it may seem counterintuitive that opposition to affirmative action would increase," said Nicholas Valentino, an associate professor of and political science.

He wrote the study with Ted Brader, a research assistant professor at the U-M Center for Political Studies.

"The answer may be simple: If the playing field is perceived to be more balanced than before, then the need for policies to address inequality is lessened," Valentino said.

Perceptions of discrimination could play a factor in how some vote in next year's presidential election.

"It is possible that these perceptions could be used by both parties to mobilize their base voters," he said.

The survey involved telephone interviews before and after the 2008 presidential elections. The pre-election interviews were completed by 617 respondents and 82 percent of these completed the post-election survey. They were asked how much discrimination they thought blacks faced in America.

Prior to the election, 61 percent said there was "a lot" or "some" discrimination against blacks, but only 50 percent endorsed that view after the election. More than one in four people revised their estimate of downward immediately after the election.

Significant declines in perceived discrimination occurred in all subgroups, including blacks, whites, men, women, the rich and the poor.

Declines in perceived racism were significantly larger among conservatives, perhaps because this group opposed race-related policies to begin with.

Anxiety before the election—regardless of party affiliation or ideology—was linked to large drops in perceived discrimination as the result of Obama's victory, Valentino said.

"Anxiety may trigger a more open-minded approach to new information, and thus facilitate belief change," he said.

Other emotions such as anger, enthusiasm and sadness before the election did not seem to affect the size of the change in perceived .

"These results suggest that voters used Obama's election as a sign that things have improved for blacks even more than they previously believed. They think the playing field is more balanced," he said. "As a result, and regardless of the reality, policies designed to improve equality of opportunity such as affirmative action are seen as less necessary."

The findings appear in this month's Public Opinion Quarterly.

Explore further: The changing landscape of religion

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Recommended for you

The changing landscape of religion

23 minutes ago

Religion is a key factor in demography, important for projections of future population growth as well as for other social indicators. A new journal, Yearbook of International Religious Demography, is the first to bring a quan ...

Abusive leadership infects entire team

45 minutes ago

Supervisors who are abusive to individual employees can actually throw the entire work team into conflict, hurting productivity, finds new research led by a Michigan State University business scholar.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

COCO
1 / 5 (1) May 30, 2011
I think Ubama has proved that there is no barrier to continuing as leader of the War Party(s) and that aggression for its own sake - and profit to his masters- remains unabated.

Well done - four more years of this and the US will indeed become the world's biggest debtor and war monger.
hush1
not rated yet Jun 03, 2011
What words to an emotionless, agenda-free discourse to the If, then, premise:

"If the playing field is perceived to be more balanced than before, then the need for policies to address inequality is lessened."

...can those words be? I accept the answer. None.

Then let the lesser of two psychologies enjoy a psychology that overcomes the lesser of the two. And harbor this hope as fatalistic. A positive answer to fatalists.