Northwest power surplus may halt wind energy
May 14, 2011 By TIM FOUGHT , Associated Press
In this photo taken Thursday, May 12, 2011, shows wind turbines along the Columbia River Gorge near Goldendale, Wash. The manager of most of the electricity in the Pacific Northwest is running such a surplus of power from hydroelectric dams that it put wind farms on notice Friday they may be shut down as early as this weekend. A cold, wet spring in the headwaters of the Columbia River Basin is sending downstream one of the largest spring flows in years. (AP Photo/Rick Bowmer)
(AP) -- The manager of most of the electricity in the Pacific Northwest is running such a surplus of power from hydroelectric dams that it put wind farms on notice Friday that they may be shut down as early as this weekend.
The Bonneville Power Administration has more than enough electricity during a cold, wet spring that has created a big surge in river flows where hydroelectric dams are located. The agency responded by announcing its intentions to curtail wind power until the grid has more capacity, in a move likely to cost the industry millions of dollars.
The decision reflects an overlooked issue amid the push to add wind farms around the country: The capacity of power grids has not kept pace.
How soon and low long wind farms might be shut down depends on how quickly the region warms up and the water shoots downriver to the Pacific Ocean, said Steven Wright, administrator of the BPA. The farms that would be shut down are mostly in Washington and Oregon.
The main culprit for the wind slowdown is spring weather that followed a winter with heavy snow in the mountains feeding the Columbia River basin. The spring surge is expected to be the largest since 1997.
When water levels are this high, the agency said, it has no choice but to use the water to generate electricity in hydroelectric dams. Laws protecting endangered species prevent it from sending all the excess water through spillways and around the dams. That beats up salmon and steelhead. It also creates so much nitrogen gas bubbling in the water that the fish get the equivalent of the bends.
Grid operators say they have run out of capability to sell the surplus electricity, store the water or shut down gas, oil, and nuclear plants - leaving wind farms the unfortunate victim.
The financing of many wind farms relies on tax credits that are of benefit only if electricity is produced. And the decision could set the stage for even more significant fights in the years to come if the Northwest wind industry doubles its capacity, as projected, over the next decade.
Major wind interests, including mainstream utilities such as Portland General Electric, have opposed the BPA's proposal and are suggesting lawsuits are next. The utility says the move could violate antitrust and market manipulation laws.
The critics also noted that President Barack Obama and Energy Secretary Steven Chu, who reappointed Wright just last year, have been staunch advocates of alternative energy such as wind power.
Salmon advocates also lined up with the wind industry out of solidarity between two groups with a long history of common environmental interests.
"It is strange how a federal agency could make this kind of decision," said Nicole Cordan of Save Our Wild Salmon. She and other critics said the BPA hadn't explored enough options. The BPA said those options would cost its traditional customers, such as public power districts, extra.
No good estimates were immediately available of what wind developers stand to lose. BPA projections earlier this year showed that curtailing wind power over a three-month period, in a worst-case scenario, could cost them as much as $50 million.
The action reflects difficulty in integrating the young wind industry into a power grid that dates to the Northwest dam-building campaign that began in the Depression and kicked into high gear after World War II.
In the past decade, state and federal governments have encouraged wind farms by requiring utility companies to obtain larger amounts of power from renewable sources and by granting tax credits. But power grid capacity hasn't enjoyed a similar expansion.
Wright said wind farms developed faster than he expected, given the severity of the recession, and regional interests have failed to find ways around the problem, leading him to realize only a few months ago that such a shutdown was likely.
"We're talking about a surplus of low-cost, carbon-free energy, and it just seemed to me there would be a solution," he said.
As it happens, the impact of the shutdown would hit hardest along the river, which cuts a famous gorge and forms something of a wind tunnel ideal for the hundreds of white turbine towers standing like pickets on the bluffs above. The capacity of the generators varies, but some are rated at up to 2 megawatts - the BPA estimates 1 megawatt can power about 700 typical homes.
Among the states, Oregon and Washington rank Nos. 4 and 5, respectively, in the amount of wind power capacity deployed, according to the most recent rankings of the American Wind Energy Association.
The Bonneville Power Administration handles about three-quarters of the Northwest's transmission and has long dealt with high water in the spring.
Coal- and gas-fired energy plants often schedule downtime for maintenance in the spring to allow electricity generators at dams to produce more. That was the rationale for the current shutdown of the Northwest's only commercial nuclear plant, at the Hanford nuclear reservation, for refueling and maintenance.
Last year, a spring storm sent a surge of wind power into the Northwest grid, and operators feverishly made adjustments.
The Bonneville Power Administration is a self-financed federal enterprise that manages three-quarters of the electrical transmission in the Northwest and sells power from 31 dams and the nuclear plant, accounting for about a third of the supply in the Northwest. Its area includes parts of eight western states.
©2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
7 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
2 minutes ago |
not rated yet |
0
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (21) |
56
|
Delphi gasoline-injection engine technique rivals hybrid's edge
(Phys.org) -- Running a diesel like engine on gasoline is something Delphi is doing in notable fashion. They claim they are on to a promising way to enjoy an engine that gives the vehicle owner high efficiency ...
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 14, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (8)
May 14, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
... somehow, I doubt that they cannot shut down the gas and oil fired power plants. I have a very suspicious feeling that wind farms just don't have the same level of political clout.
What is necessary however, is a better interconnected infrastructure that is able to move excess power to areas of need. Green power depends on being strongly interconnected.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
Sounds more like an unintended consequence of capitalism.
These wind farms were created to produce a profit.
Supply has exceeded demand reducing profits.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 0.8 / 5 (51)
Much like your posting.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
(and for the overly serious, that's sarcasm)
*
May 14, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
"The financing of many wind farms relies on tax credits "
"In the past decade, state and federal governments have encouraged wind farms by requiring utility companies to obtain larger amounts of power from renewable sources and by granting tax credits."
"When water levels are this high, the agency said, it has no choice but to use the water to generate electricity in hydroelectric dams. Laws protecting endangered species prevent it from sending all the excess water through spillways and around the dams."
Where is a free market here?
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
PDO: http://en.wikiped...illation
May 14, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
1. Give customers free electricity when you have a surplus like this. The goodwill it will generate might increase their appetite for power.
2. If they get used to higher levels of power, that might continue after the free period of electricity is over. Even a week of free electricity might "reset" people use of it.
3. Offer subsides of your biggest clients to store power at their location. Offer the ability for them to "sell back" power if they take on the cost of power storage. This effectively makes the power grid more of a peer-peer arrangement.
4. Offer grants to universities and think tanks to crack the superconducting at room temperature problem. If you solved this you could always find a customer for your power.
Why do people think so short sightedly?
Regards,
Chimac
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
They can't. Wind is so variable there must be a reliable baseline of power or there will be blackouts if the wind dies down. Coal plants can't spin up instantly. But wind can spin DOWN almost instantly.
(Oil is rarely used in power plants. Coal is #1)
May 14, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (4)
still be waiting. If you waited for capitalism to build the
damns on the Columbia River, you'd still be waiting. If you
waited for capitalism to build the nuclear power plants, you'd
still be waiting.
All that work has been socialism: government money for the
very significant public good. All of those things rely on the
initial government contracts that created them. Nuclear power
plants can only exist commercially because the US government
provides insurance in the event that you fukushima your reactor.
One problem with the power grids built for the public good is
that they serve only the regions they were built in. They
were not designed to serve markets for power across the nation. Northwestern power has a hard time getting to California.
Don't worry about this wet, wet year. There will be dry years
in the future, and the windfarms will still be there. Maybe a
coal plant could be mothballed.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
There's a very good reason to that. AC lines leak - they lose electricity through capacitive coupling, and as the line gets longer, it starts to radiate energy like a very large radio antenna.
To keep the energy loss at an acceptable level, power should be generated less than 300 miles from the point where it's used, even though you could theoretically transmit power over 1000 miles away.
So that's why, when you transmit power over long distances, the power plants operate like dominoes. One helps the other, which helps the second, which helps the third. The maximum amount of power you can put through the chain depends on the weakest link in the chain.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"Strange but True: The Largest Organism on Earth Is a Fungus
The blue whale is big, but nowhere near as huge as a sprawling fungus in eastern Oregon"
"Occupies some 2,384 acres (965 hectares) of soil in Oregon's Blue Mountains. Put another way, this humongous fungus would encompass 1,665 football fields, or nearly four square miles (10 square kilometers) of turf."
May 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Wind power needs its own dedicated infrastructure of HVDC lines across the nation, but who's going to build them? There's also the problem because DC transmission has active running costs because of the energy needed to operate the switching electronics, which can even consume more power than is being transmitted during low power operation.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Wind power needs both positive and negative reserve. Positive means input when the wind isn't blowing but power is needed, and negative means shutting down other powerplants when the wind blows.
Hydro power is used for both positive and negative reserve in the grid, but now that the dams are full and more water is coming upstream, they're basically running at full tilt and cannot be used to buffer wind power or any other power.
So, the alternative is to start to throttle coal and nuclear power, but they cannot be throttled fast enough.
The third alternative is to turn down coal and nuclear, and bring a lot of gas turbines and diesel/oil generators online. That would cost about 50x more and waste a ton of fuel, negating the point of using the wind power.
May 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Doesn't solve the actual problem. Without the ability to adjust for the power, nobody can use the wind energy anyways.
On the average, it takes roughly 75% of fast adjustable power to fit 25% of wind power in the mix, so you'd need four times the wind's worth of extra demand, and you'd need to generate 3/4 of that using gas and oil which is expensive.
Plus, what happens when the water eventually runs out and returns to normal flow?
May 14, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
"In 1895, the Niagara Falls Power Company began placing contracts with the Westinghouse Company for long distance electric transmission development and implementation. It included the building of transformers that could handle 1,250 horsepower and the stringing of overhead wires capable of transmitting 11,000 volts."
http://www.niagar...ml#Adams
May 14, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Since we don't have any way to store large amounts of wind energy anywhere, not even in hydroelectric dams because the dams are still relatively small, it means that wind power cannot be used to meet any demand.
It's role is to substitute other power when it is available. That's the only way we can use it. Now that the circumstances don't permit us to turn down that other power, we cannot use the wind power.
Building long distance transmission lines is just first aid, and very expensive at that, and it doesn't necessarily even work all the time. What ultimately needs to be done is developing massive scale Grid Energy Storage that can suck up months of surplus power production.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
That means the companies that produce power have to pay somebody to accept the electricity that they are producing. Yet this doesn't show up in the consumers' electricity bill, because they buy their electricity indirectly at a fixed price.
But the people who produce wind power still turn a profit because the government subsidies are higher than the price they have to pay to push the power into the grid.
Technically, it would be possible to start a company that does nothing but heat seawater with huge resistors, and get paid to waste energy.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
Only in a socialist economy.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
It's quite a free market. It operates like the stock market with power companies selling and buying power at minute intervals.
The only problem is this market failure, wind power, that drives everything off because you have to let it in, even though it doesn't behave nicely and it costs everybody money, and it doesn't really contribute much anything to the total energy balance.
May 14, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Then it is NOT free.
May 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Think of it this way: the governments are buying wind power from the companies through subsidizing it.
Negative prices can occur naturally sometimes when there's momentary overproduction due to shifts in consumption patterns, and it's the driving signal that makes it possible to have a grid where the operators come from multiple companies in multiple nations in a patchwork of a grid. When the spot prices fall below what you want to sell, you reduce output and the prices rise up again to reflect supply and demand.
Normally the price mechanism would stop overproduction, but since wind power is being paid regardless, they simply keep producing despite having to pay to do so, because it costs them less than what they gain. The market is still free, but one of the players isn't following the rules.
Companies with both wind and hydro can regulate wind output and play nice. The problem is those with only wind power.
May 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
What would be more intelligent is to found a company that hoovers up the energy at negative spot prices, and then returns it back to the grid at a profit. There's so much gain to be made in selling peak power that you don't even have to dip into negative prices - you can buy power when the prices are still positive and still turn a nice profit, because the spot prices can jump up 500x when there's a bad shortage.
Unfortunately this is not feasible or cost-effective at a large-enough scale with current technology. If it was, they would have done so already and solved the whole wind power problem.
May 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
When you have company that can produce 1000 MW and no more, but the demand is 1200 MW, then another company steps up and says "I can sell you that 200 MW if the price is 2x higher", so the price jumps up and the first company also makes the same profit for the electricity they sell to the market.
The irony is that this first company is a nuclear power company that is prohibited from building more reactors by the politicians and the public.
And then they all complain when nuclear power gets huge windfall profits. Well duh, if you just let them build, they would be able to do the 1200 MW and the second company would have to compete in price with them, leading to lower prices.
May 15, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
We agree, the problem is caused by govt regulations, aka socialism.
Govts caused the rolling blackouts in CA 10 years ago by changing regulation, not de-regulating as popularly believed.
May 15, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
The Columbia River dams were a flood control project with power as a benefit.
"The Canadian and U.S. governments agreed in 1944 to begin studies for potential future joint development of dams in the Columbia River basin. Planning efforts were slow until a 1948 Columbia River flood caused extensive damage from Trail, British Columbia, to Cathlamet, Washington, and completely destroyed Vanport, the second largest city in Oregon. The increased interest in flood protection, and the growing need for power development, initiated 11 years of discussions and alternative proposals for construction of dams in Canada. In 1959, the governments issued a report that recommended principles for negotiating an agreement and apportioning the costs and benefits."
May 15, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
May 22, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
When real people cheat real people the courts get involved.
When corporate "people" (as defined by the USA Supreme Court) cheat real people the courts are never involved. Profits are what "we love or leave" as the saying goes. War is great business for them...we're still there and sending more equipment that will never return. I wish I didn't have to type that last part, sorry. The people are more important.
May 22, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
May 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
No, it is limit bound, not regulated.
May 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
NotParker had some good things to say as well. I would like to add to his post where he said:
He's talking about how you can't shut down all the coal/oil/gas plants. I would like to add that even without variable wind power, there are fluxuations in line load. There are small to medium sized power plants in the grids which are designed to help with load leveling. You can't just shut those down. There are spikes in demand from consumers according to time of day and such. For example, when everybody is getting up in the morning and getting ready for work there's a 'rush hour' for power just like there is with trafic.
May 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
As pointed out above, there's a diminishing return on long transmission lines. The wind mills they are talking about feathering are the ones closest to the hydro dams. Those areas would not be serviced by many coal/oil/gas plants. It doesn't do any good to close a coal plant that's 1000 miles away (unless there's wind power there too :) ). There's also choke points in grids that limit the amount of power you can transmit. Different areas use different voltage/fequency, so you need special facilities to convert. Japan is having that problem now because they don't have enough capacity at those choke points to get power from other regions into the damaged area.
Also, there are rural areas that run gas and oil plants in farming co-ops to suplement areas that are not well-connected to the main grids. You can't shut those down either, because there's no alternative source.
May 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Doesn't that vary from State to State? I know there was a vote here in the SC State Senate over a planned rate increase recently.
May 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I also have to admit that I fell into the falacy of comparing consumer rates to exchange rates between producers and distributors.
May 28, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
"From 1879 to 1907 electric utilities were not subjected to any
price regulation. They were required to obtain operating franchises from municipalities, but the literature of the day described an era of free competition in which municipalities granted
franchises to many who applied. It was the industry itself, whose profits suffered from open
entry, that vigorously lobbied for entry restrictions and for state regulation of prices and profits."
"the effect of regulation during the early period was to increase prices and profits and to reduce output."
http://www.iser.u..._96b.pdf
Fortunately the trend is toward a competitive energy market.