Empowered by a $1.2 million grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Arizona State University scientist Wayne Frasch is deciphering how one of the worlds smallest molecular motors works in living cells. In the process, he is also casting light on a physics puzzle that has perplexed scientists for more than 40 years.
Frasch, a professor in the School of Life Sciences, examines the Fo molecular motor, its mechanism of action and how it partners with the F1 motor as part of the FoF1 ATP synthase. At about 10 nanometers in diameter, each motor is 10,000 times smaller than the width of a piece of paper. In living things, Fo and F1 are attached by a common rotary axel that allows the two motors to work together and supply energy to cells in the form of adenosine triphosphate (ATP).
Research of nanoscale motors is not just complicated by size. Molecular motors operate via extremely small motions that occur on time scales that have been extraordinarily difficult to measure. The Fo molecular motor is also embedded in a living cells lipid membrane, which is only two molecules thick. Adding to the experimental challenge is the fact that the molecular motors rotational energy arises from the flow of protons, positively-charged atomic particles, across that membrane.
The Frasch lab is among only a few laboratories equipped to visualize how a single molecule of the Fo motor rotates. Frasch and his ASU College of Liberal Arts and Sciences colleagues have developed an experimental system that embeds the Fo motor in an artificial phospholipid bilayer laid down in nanodiscs, which help to stabilize the molecular complexes. Fraschs group then devised an imaging strategy, using gold nanorods attached to Fo to monitor the rotation of the single FoF1 molecules.
Knowing more about these tiny, but extraordinarily efficient nearly 100 percent molecular motors offers an avenue to development new technologies, such as power sources for fuel-efficient nanodevices and nanotechnology applications like molecular detection, computing and biomedicine, Frasch says.
One early outcome of Frasch and the ASU teams FoF1 experiments, recently published in EMBO Journal, provides enticing new clues into an old conundrum: a Brownian ratchet first proposed by physicist Richard Feynman more than 40 years ago.
Previous studies of the Fo motor led researchers to propose that Fo contains a molecular ratchet capable of biasing Brownian motion, the random motion of molecules, in a way that favors rotation in the direction of ATP synthesis, says Frasch. However, little evidence existed for the type of periodic interruptions in rotation consistent with this type of ratcheting mechanism.
What was known is that the flow of protons across the membrane through Fo channels in a static subunit-a drives clockwise rotation of the c-ring rotor comprised of 10 c-subunits that each shuttle a single proton. This clockwise rotation in turn drives ATP synthesis, which occurs in the F1 motor because the c-ring attaches to one end of the axle that links units Fo and F1.
Using a gold nanorod attached to the c-ring of a single FoF1 molecule, Fraschs group can examine the motors rotation in more depth. The group measures changes in light intensity from the gold nanorod as it (and the c-ring) rotates, which allows the ASU team to see that the rotary motion of the c-ring is periodically interrupted. When subunit-a grabbed onto subunit-c, the interaction behaved as a leash, allowing the c-ring to rotate, but at a limit of 36 degree increments while engaged like a ratchet, Frasch says, This periodic interruption only occurred under conditions in which there was sufficient drag on the nanorod to slow the motor, similar to conditions found in a living cell where ATP is maintained at a high level.
With the new NIH funding, Fraschs School of Life Sciences research group will examine if the leash is a component of the long sought after Browning ratchet. Understanding how or if Brownian motion is harnessed in a molecular ratchet has the potential for use in the development of synthetic molecular motors with low energy consumption and nanoscale energy production.
Explore further: Using nanotechnology to improve the speed, efficiency and sensitivity of biosensors