Water waves exhibit negative gravity near a periodic array of buoys
May 9, 2011 by Lisa Zyga
Scientists have discovered a new mechanism to block water waves, which could be used to extract energy from ocean waves.
(PhysOrg.com) -- Ocean waves can be incredibly strong and very difficult to block completely. When a wave moving across the ocean interacts with a buoy, the wave can be slightly dampened, but will still pass by if its wavelength is long enough compared to the size of the buoy. But in a new study, scientists have calculated that a periodic array of resonators (such as vertical bottom-mounted split tubes or damping buoys) resonating at a low frequency can completely block water waves. The effect arises from the water having negative effective gravity.
The researchers, Xinhua Hu from Fudan University in Shanghai, China, and coauthors from China and the US, have published their study in a recent issue of Physical Review Letters.
Through mathematical calculations and numerical simulations, the researchers have shown that, when a periodic array of vertical bottom-mounted split tubes resonates near a certain low frequency, the array strongly reflects approaching water waves. They found that such a strong reflection can dramatically modify the absorption efficiency of the waves.
It is a surprising result that a periodic structure can block long-wavelength water waves (namely, with wavelength longer than the periodic length) because conventional periodic structures such as a periodic array of bottom-mounted cylinders cannot block long-wavelength water waves, Hu told PhysOrg.com. In order to block long-wavelength water waves, the building block of the structure should have a low resonant frequency or a long resonant wavelength. Bottom-mounted split tubes or heaving buoys can present such a low-frequency resonance.
As the researchers explain, because the water waves cannot pass through the periodic array of resonators, its as if the water has negative effective gravity.
The gravity is usually positive or pointed to the center of the Earth, Hu explained. Effective gravity is a parameter in our effective medium theory for long-wavelength water waves propagating through a periodic structure. The effective gravity is also usually positive for conventional periodic structures such as a periodic array of bottom-mounted cylinders.
Although the researchers simulations involved the split tubes as resonators, they predict that other resonators such as damping buoys would have the same effect. Buoys that can block water waves could be used to extract ocean wave energy, and play a key role in future ocean wave power plants.
Although current researches focus on improving the efficiency of a single resonator, an array of damping resonators is regarded as a key part of future ocean wave power plants, Hu said. Our work reveals that the absorption spectrum of an array of damping resonator (two absorption peaks) is quite different from that of a single damping resonator (one absorption peak). Such a modification is not expected by engineers on ocean wave energy extraction. Knowing such a modification is important for the future design of the resonator in ocean wave power plants.
Hu added that the research group has experimentally verified the predicted results, which will be published in an upcoming paper.
More information: Xinhua Hu, et al. Negative Effective Gravity in Water Waves by Periodic Resonator Arrays. Physical Review Letters 106, 174501 (2011). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.174501
Copyright 2011 PhysOrg.com.
All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed in whole or part without the express written permission of PhysOrg.com.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Transparency of molten substances?
May 25, 2012
-
saturated paramagnetic and ferromagnetic
May 24, 2012
-
How to calculate the bandstructure of Twisted Bilayer Graphene
May 23, 2012
-
vast computational richness from swapping one proton
May 22, 2012
-
Oscillator strength of mixed LH- and HH-excitons
May 22, 2012
-
2D Quantum Well and k-values
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Atomic, Solid State, Comp. Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (21) |
47
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?
The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.
May 21, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
8
Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector
A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...
May 21, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (16) |
7
|
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 09, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (9)
Normal ocean waves are a quarternary manifestation of solar power.
1) Direct Sunlight
2) Heats the land and ocean, driving convection (hard to harness).
3) Convection and temperature difference drive Wind Power.
4) Wind power produces wave action
The energy density in wave action is limited by the size and period of the waves. Under ordinary circumstances, not very much of this is going to be available to harvest in some sort of turbine or mill.
Additionally, waves are strongest where wind is strongest, with only a few exceptions of odd ocean floor topography and v-shaped bays. Therefore, you could as well invest in maximum wind turbine footprint in the area before considering wave harvesting.
May 09, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (7)
It's already dampened, you muppet, it's water.
I think you mean "damped".
May 09, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (6)
Namely, the Gulf Stream as it passes through the Florida straights between Florida and Cuba, and between Florida and the Bahamas.
With a 2.5m/s flow rate, a cross-section of the Gulf Stream produces up to 7800 watts/m^2.
Even if a water turbine farm in the Gulf Stream was only 20% efficient, that would be 1562 watts/m^2...
By comparison, a wind turbine experiencing 15kts winds (7.66m/s) at 30% efficiency produces only 81 watts/m^2...
Now a "Current" is much different than a "Wave" because a current is to water what wind is to atmosphere. The key difference is the mass of liquid water is so much more than that of air, so there is more kinetic energy from the mass component...about 1000 times more to be exact.
May 09, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (2)
May 09, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
May 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
No.
No.
May 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
May 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 09, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (5)
How about if I said something incorrect, you actually provide a rebuttal.
My calculations above were done using the formula for power of a moving fluid, given it's density, cross section of the flow, and velocity.
If you have a problem with that then maybe you should bother doing some actual research.
What else would you be disputing from my posts above?
Sunlight causes heat, which causes wind? Hope you don't disagree with that...
Wind causes wave action? Again, hope you know that, because if not...
so um...what do you disagree with?
Maybe you're the guy who gave his tsunami question a 5...
Must not know much about tsunamis.
Try watching some of the videos from Japan.
Your pathetic man made oscillator isn't going to stop a 9300 gigaton wave...
My goodness.
May 09, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
May 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Its like a mirror reflecting laser light a million times more powerful than anything can absorb without being obliterated.
This isn't obviously wrong, although I admit to its improbability.
May 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
You're making a flawed assumption. Energy from the sun is not the only driver of oceanic current / ocean waves. Gravity plays a major role here; the moon's gravitational pull, for example, creates a difference in tidal water levels of many meters in many parts of the world. Ocean wave generators harness gravity at least as much as they indirectly harness heat from the sun.
May 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Probably to increase publicity for their article, so it'll get featured on sites like these...
May 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
How do you define what is easier? Anybody can build a generator that harnesses motion. Can you manufacture a photovoltaic cell?
May 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
No. They have shown that their SIMULATION demonstrated what they perhaps wanted it to demonstrate.
'Simulations' are not 'proof' of anything other than that the sim produces a result.
Not to say they are not useful, but what they show is not connected to reality except thru the preconceptions of the designers of the sim.