Native groups sue over polar bear critical habitat

May 14, 2011 By RACHEL D'ORO , Associated Press

(AP) -- Alaska Native groups worried about losing tax revenues and royalties from oil development filed a lawsuit Friday challenging the federal government's designation of critical habitat for threatened polar bears on the state's oil-rich North Slope.

The Arctic Slope Regional Corp., North Slope Borough, Inupiat Community of the Arctic Slope and other groups took issue with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's decision to designate more than 187,000 square miles - an area larger than California - as critical habitat for the bears, part of the recovery plan required by law for a species declared threatened or endangered.

The Department of the Interior is also named in the lawsuit, which says the government's designation "will not address the primary threat to , the loss of due to climate change."

The of the designation to the state, the North Slope Borough and the Arctic Slope Regional Corp. - a regional Native corporation - could reach in the billions of dollars, plaintiffs said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.

Even a one-year delay in production for a fairly small could mean losing millions in tax revenues and royalties, according to plaintiffs, who said Native stakeholders would be affected because the revenues are shared. ASRC and other regional Native corporations own lands affected by the designation, the lawsuit said.

"My biggest concern is how this will affect our communities and local economies," North Slope Borough mayor Edward Itta said in the announcement. "The only thing this designation accomplishes is to create another threatened species - the people who live here."

The designation, announced last November, includes large areas of sea ice off Alaska's coast, including places where petroleum companies hope to drill in the Chukchi and Beaufort seas. The designation doesn't automatically block development but requires federal officials to consider whether a proposed action would adversely affect polar bear habitat and interfere with its recovery.

Polar bears were declared a threatened species in 2008 by the Interior Department under former President George W. Bush because of diminishing sea ice. Polar bears use sea ice to hunt and breed.

Environmentalists say polar bears need a reduction in greenhouse gases that cause climate warming. The can address , attorney Rebecca Noblin of the Center for Biological Diversity said. The center and two other conservation groups last month filed to intervene in the lawsuits and Noblin said there were plans to intervene in the suit by the Native groups.

"Oil and gas development is an additional stress on polar bears," she said. "If we can minimize the impacts of oil and gas development, that gives struggling polar bears a better chance of surviving the loss of sea ice."

The Fish and Wildlife Service doesn't comment on active or pending litigation, agency spokesman Bruce Woods said.

Friday's suit follows federal lawsuits filed in March by the state and the Alaska Oil and Gas Association over the habitat designation.

The state also has challenged the designation of polar bears as a threatened species. That lawsuit, filed two years ago, is pending before a federal judge in Washington, D.C.

Explore further: Pollution linked to lethal sea turtle tumors

4.4 /5 (5 votes)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Trade group sues over polar bear critical habitat

Mar 04, 2011

(AP) -- An Alaska petroleum industry trade group has sued the federal government over its designation of 187,157 square miles as polar bear critical habitat, claiming it covers too much territory and could cost tens of millions ...

Feds designate polar bear habitat in Alaska

Oct 22, 2009

(AP) -- The Obama administration said Thursday it is designating more than 200,000 square miles in Alaska and off its coast as "critical habitat" for polar bears, an action that could add restrictions to ...

Polar bears at risk from ice loss

Oct 14, 2005

Survival of the remaining polar bears is increasingly jeopardized by rapid disappearance of the arctic sea ice, conservation groups say.

Recommended for you

Shape up quickly—applies to fish, too

1 hour ago

Fish can live in almost any aquatic environment on Earth, but when the climate changes and temperatures go up many species are pushed to the limit. The amount of time needed to adjust to new conditions could ...

Biological sciences professor publishes pupfish research

3 hours ago

Craig Stockwell, professor of biological sciences, has co-written a research article that evaluates the history of the Devil's Hole pupfish, which rapidly evolved following its isolation. The article published Sept. 17 in ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

deatopmg
1 / 5 (1) May 15, 2011
"Alaska Native groups worried about losing tax revenues and royalties from oil development filed a lawsuit Friday challenging the federal government's designation of critical habitat for threatened polar bears on the state's oil-rich North Slope."

Sounds like an AP political editorial NOT a news report!

Those natives know that these extremely dangerous animals have been reproducing like mad, more than tripling their population in the past 30 or so years. They have to live w/ them, in the wild, on a daily basis. They're not behind bars or glass at the local zoo where they may be "cute" to naive city folk.

In addition, either we drill for and recover our own oil or continue to pay terrorist nations for it. If the native tribes benefit w/ more money and fewer bears all the better. The choice for me is obvious. For the bear lovers/petroleum haters, go hug one of your cute bears.
Kev_C
5 / 5 (1) May 15, 2011
in response to deatopmg
Polar bears tripling in numbers over the last 30 years????? Where in the world did you dig that idea from? As far as any research has been able to conclude the polar bears are under extreme pressure to find food (not because of polar bear-polar bear competition) and their frozen habitat which they depend upon for that function is disappearing faster than a snow flake in June, or had you not quite got the news about the meeting in Nuuk, Greenland to divide the region up for exploitation of natural resources because the sea ice is disappearing sufficiently to allow this to happen?

The planet is being screwed by greedy people who think money is more important than biodiversity. They will only realise their mistake when all they have left to eat is a heap of soggy bank notes or worse a bank statement with a few zero's after the one. Makes me wonder how many zero's there will be on your bank statement?