Methane levels 17 times higher in water wells near hydrofracking sites

May 09, 2011

A study by Duke University researchers has found high levels of leaked methane in well water collected near shale-gas drilling and hydrofracking sites. The scientists collected and analyzed water samples from 68 private groundwater wells across five counties in northeastern Pennsylvania and New York.

"At least some of the homeowners who claim that their wells were contaminated by shale-gas extraction appear to be right," says Robert B. Jackson, Nicholas Professor of and director of Duke's Center on Global Change.

, also called hydrofracking or fracking, involves pumping water, sand and chemicals deep underground into horizontal gas wells at high pressure to crack open hydrocarbon-rich shale and extract natural gas.

The study found no evidence of contamination from chemical-laden fracking fluids, which are injected into gas wells to help break up shale deposits, or from "produced water," wastewater that is extracted back out of the wells after the shale has been fractured.

The peer-reviewed study of well-water contamination from shale-gas drilling and hydrofracking appears this week in the online Early Edition of the .

"We found measurable amounts of in 85 percent of the samples, but levels were 17 times higher on average in wells located within a kilometer of active hydrofracking sites," says Stephen Osborn, postdoctoral research associate at Duke's Nicholas School of the Environment. The contamination was observed primarily in Bradford and Susquehanna counties in Pennsylvania.

Water wells farther from the gas wells contained lower levels of methane and had a different isotopic fingerprint.

"Methane is CH4. By using carbon and tracers we could distinguish between thermogenic methane, which is formed at deep underground and is captured in gas wells during hydrofracking, and biogenic methane, which is produced at shallower depths and lower temperatures," says Avner Vengosh, professor of geochemistry and water quality. Biogenic methane is not associated with hydrofracking.

"Methane in water wells within a kilometer had an isotopic composition similar to thermogenic methane," Vengosh says. "Outside this active zone, it was mostly a mixture of the two."

The scientists confirmed their finding by comparing the dissolved gas chemistry of water samples to the gas chemistry profiles of shale-gas wells in the region, using data from the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection. "Deep gas has a distinctive chemical signature in its isotopes," Jackson says. "When we compared the dissolved gas chemistry in well water to methane from local gas wells, the signatures matched."

Methane is flammable and poses a risk of explosion. In very high concentrations, it can cause asphyxiation. Little research has been conducted on the health effects of drinking methane-contaminated water and methane isn't regulated as a contaminant in public water systems under the EPA's National Primary Drinking Water Regulations.

The Duke team collected samples from counties overlying the Marcellus shale formation. Accelerated and hydrofracking in the region in recent years has fueled concerns about well-water contamination by methane, produced and fracking fluids, which contain a proprietary mix of chemicals that companies often don't disclose.

Explore further: Confucian thought and China's environmental dilemmas

Related Stories

Fracking leaks may make gas 'dirtier' than coal

Apr 12, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Extracting natural gas from the Marcellus Shale could do more to aggravate global warming than mining coal, according to a Cornell study published in the May issue of Climatic Change Letters (105:5).

Process could clean up water used in natural gas drilling

Mar 12, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- Texas A&M Engineering is playing a role in a technological breakthrough that could clean up the contaminated water recovered from drilling natural gas wells in shale deposits through the process of "hydraulic ...

US asks firms to reveal gas extraction liquid

Sep 10, 2010

The US environmental regulator on Thursday asked gas companies to reveal what chemicals are used in deep extraction, addressing concerns by residents that their drinking water is being contaminated.

Recommended for you

Confucian thought and China's environmental dilemmas

1 hour ago

Conventional wisdom holds that China - the world's most populous country - is an inveterate polluter, that it puts economic goals above conservation in every instance. So China's recent moves toward an apparent ...

Deforestation threatens species richness in streams

1 hour ago

With a population of 1.3 billion, China is under immense pressure to convert suitable areas into arable land in order to ensure a continued food supply for its people. Accordingly, China is among the top ...

New York state bans fracking

14 hours ago

Governor Andrew Cuomo said Wednesday he would ban hydraulic fracking in New York State, citing health concerns about the controversial oil and gas drilling technique.

User comments : 9

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

TAz00
5 / 5 (2) May 09, 2011
If you have yet to watch the Documentary "Gasland" then do it now!
Dug
5 / 5 (3) May 09, 2011
Here in Florida our scientifically illiterate and willfully ignorant legislature are allowing the "fracking" our drinking water aquifers with sewage and industrial waste injection systems - who needs the petroleum industry to contaminate your drinking water?
Vendicar_Decarian
4.4 / 5 (7) May 09, 2011
If the Oil and Gas industry say that Fracking doesn't release natural gas into the aquifer then it doesn't.

And anyone who claims otherwise is a Communist dupe.

According to the Republicans.

po6ert
1 / 5 (2) May 09, 2011
BIG COAL DOESN'T WANT THE COMPETITION. try the effects of mountain top mining,or open pit or the pollution from a coal fired power plant. people whose water is polluted are the same people who are recieving royalties for gas. they sre just whining.
zevkirsh
1 / 5 (3) May 09, 2011
the earth farts. so what. a little methane never hurt anyone.
TAz00
5 / 5 (1) May 10, 2011
the earth farts. so what. a little methane never hurt anyone.


You must be trolling, methane is over 20 times more efficient at trapping heat than CO2 is.
SteveL
5 / 5 (1) May 10, 2011
Perhaps the EPA should be doing methane contaminate testing to determine if they ought to set drinking water standards. They should be moving on this. This is a classic example of why governmental regulations are needed in many cases - to protect people who cannot protect themselves.

There is no evidence under pure capitalism that these effected consumers by not using the product of the corporation will force the corporation to stop its harmful activities.
deepsand
5 / 5 (5) May 10, 2011
The new Republican Governor of Pennsylvania, in his desire to redirect general funds from public schools to private ones favored by the Koch Brothers, the DeVos scions, and other Robber Barrons, has proposed that schools, colleges & universities make up the shortfall by fracking on campus.
Vendicar_Decarian
5 / 5 (1) May 15, 2011
There is already a lot of fracking on campus.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.