US lawmakers plan 'Do Not Track' bills (Update)

May 06, 2011 by Chris Lefkow
A man uses a laptop computer at a wireless cafe. US lawmakers announced plans on Friday to introduce "Do Not Track" legislation that would let Internet users block companies from gathering information about their online activities.

US lawmakers announced plans on Friday to introduce "Do Not Track" legislation that would let Internet users block companies from gathering information about their online activities.

Senator Jay Rockefeller, a Democrat from West Virginia, said his "Do Not Track Online Act of 2011" will offer a "simple, straightforward way for people to stop companies from tracking their every move on the Internet."

"Consumers have a right to know when and how their personal and sensitive information is being used online -- and most importantly to be able to say 'no thanks' when companies seek to gather that information without their approval," Rockefeller said in a statement.

In the House of Representatives, Joe Barton, a Republican from Texas, and Edward Markey, a Democrat from Massachusetts, released a draft of a separate "Do Not Track" bill aimed at protecting children online.

US senators John Kerry and John McCain introduced an online privacy bill last month that would require companies gathering data to allow a consumer to "opt-out" of having their information collected.

The former Democratic and Republican presidential candidates said their bill seeks to strike a balance between protecting the personal information of Web users and the needs of businesses to conduct electronic commerce.

The flurry of legislation comes amid a series of high-profile data theft incidents, including the theft of personal information from more than 100 million Sony accounts, and controversy over tracking technology in Apple's iPhone and in smartphones running Google's Android software.

Apple and Google are to attend a congressional hearing on privacy next week following claims the iPhone and Android devices regularly track a user's location and stores the data.

"We look forward to engaging with policymakers about how we protect our users' mobile privacy," Google said in an email to AFP.

Google explained that people must opt-in to use location-sharing on Android-powered smartphones and get to control how data is used.

"Any location data that is sent back to Google location servers is anonymized and is not tied or traceable to a specific user," the Mountain View, California-based Internet titan said.

Apple vice president of software Guy Tribble was listed as representing the Cupertino, California-based iPhone, iPad and iPod maker at the hearing.

Apple on Wednesday released updated software for iPhones to fix "bugs" that resulted in location data being unencrypted and stored for up to a year.

The changes came in an iOS 4.3.3 software update.

Apple has denied tracking iPhone users, maintaining that locations of Wi-Fi hotspots and cell towers was used for services such as navigation or targeted ads.

Rockefeller, chairman of the Senate Commerce Committee, said his bill would create a "legal obligation" for all online companies to honor the choice of consumers who say they do not want to be tracked online.

It would give the Federal Trade Commission the power to pursue any company that does not honor the request.

Barton and Markey, the co-chairmen of the Bi-Partisan Congressional Privacy Caucus, said their "Do Not Track Kids Act of 2011" establishes new protections for the personal information of children and teenagers.

"For millions of kids today, the Internet is their new 21st century playground," Markey said in a statement. "But kids growing up in this online environment also need protection from the dangers that can lurk in cyberspace."

The bill would notably require online companies to obtain parental consent before collecting children's personal information and prohibit them from using personal information of children and teens for targeted marketing.

It would also create an "Eraser Button" for parents and children that would allow users to eliminate publicly available personal information content "when technologically feasible."

Explore further: Erdogan passes law tightening Turkey's grip on Internet

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US senators introduce online privacy 'bill of rights'

Apr 12, 2011

US senators John Kerry and John McCain introduced an online privacy bill Tuesday that seeks to strike a balance between protecting the personal information of Web users and the needs of businesses to conduct ...

US lawmaker unveils Internet, finance privacy bills

Feb 12, 2011

Cheered on by civil liberties advocates and consumer groups, a US lawmaker introduced legislation Friday to help safeguard Internet users' privacy and rein in dissemination of personal financial data.

New report calls for online privacy bill of rights

Dec 16, 2010

(AP) -- The Commerce Department is calling for the creation of a "privacy bill of rights" for Internet users to set ground rules for companies that collect consumer data online and use that information for marketing and ...

Pandora subpoenaed in information-sharing inquiry

Apr 04, 2011

Online radio service Pandora has received a subpoena from a federal grand jury investigating whether popular smartphone applications share information about their users with advertisers and other third parties.

Apple, Google asked to testify on mobile privacy

Apr 26, 2011

US lawmakers have invited Apple and Google to attend a hearing on privacy next month following claims the iPhone and Android devices regularly track a user's location and stores the data.

Recommended for you

US threatened Yahoo with huge fine over surveillance

Sep 11, 2014

US authorities threatened to fine Yahoo $250,000 a day if it failed to comply with a secret surveillance program requiring it to hand over user data in the name of national security, court documents showed ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

dogbert
3 / 5 (4) May 06, 2011
Such bills are welcome but all contain a fatal flaw -- they are "opt out" bills. The default should be privacy. Consumers should be able to "opt in" to tracking if they want it. They should never be required to "opt out".

The "do not call" registry is an example of an "opt out" system. It doesn't work well even when consumers "opt out" because all "opt out" systems presume that most will not "opt out" and that there will be no real penalty for ignoring "opt out" consumers.
Norezar
not rated yet May 06, 2011
Such bills are welcome but all contain a fatal flaw -- they are "opt out" bills. The default should be privacy. Consumers should be able to "opt in" to tracking if they want it. They should never be required to "opt out".

The "do not call" registry is an example of an "opt out" system. It doesn't work well even when consumers "opt out" because all "opt out" systems presume that most will not "opt out" and that there will be no real penalty for ignoring "opt out" consumers.


"Opt Out"

6_6
1 / 5 (2) May 07, 2011
so hackers are meant to obey this now? pff
iPan
not rated yet May 07, 2011
Fine, just make sure this applies to government tracking as well.
deepsand
1 / 5 (1) May 09, 2011
A tempest in a tea pot.

Neither the public nor the legislators know and understand enough about the technologies involved in order to make well informed decisions re. what is necessary and what is not, what is personal and what is not, what is potentially harmful and what is benign.