JFK's 1961 speech led space exploration to new heights

May 25, 2011 By Stephen P. Maran
President John F. Kennedy addresses a joint session of Congress on May 25, 1961 about the decision to go to the moon. Credit: NASA

Fifty years ago, on May 25, 1961, President John F. Kennedy told a joint session of Congress that "this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the moon and returning him safely to the earth."

His vision became NASA's Apollo program, which conducted six successful manned lunar landings during 1969-72 and brought the crews and the that they collected safely home. As Kennedy intended, the Apollo program established the nation's preeminence in , but it also produced a revolution in scientific understanding of the moon, sparking a debate that continues today about the relative merits of manned and robotic exploration.   

Kennedy's call to action was viewed as a largely geopolitical maneuver, intended to achieve U.S. supremacy in rocketry and space travel at a time when the Soviet Union had gained a huge head start by launching Sputnik 1, the first artificial satellite, and Yuri Gagarin -- the first man to orbit Earth. There were defense implications: rockets that launch manned capsules into orbit could also propel nuclear weapons across intercontinental distances.  

Whether Apollo had a strong scientific purpose at first or not, the president's speech "was tremendously influential," said retired astronomer William E. Howard, who served in military, academic, and intelligence organizations. "[It] inspired a lot of people to go into science."    

This video is not supported by your browser at this time.

Richard Vondrak was a high school senior in 1961. Now a physicist, Vondrak said that the excitement kindled by the new space program led him to a research career. Donald Bogard was a college student when Kennedy spoke. He said that by 1969, when the first rocks from the moon arrived, he was a scientist "behind the quarantine barrier in the lunar receiving lab" at NASA's Manned Spacecraft Center (now the Johnson Space Center) in Houston. Bogard retired last year as chief scientist for astromaterials at the center, and recently said that "Apollo science set the stage for the golden era of planetary exploration." Since Apollo, robotic spacecraft have been the main sources of new information on the moon and planets.

Scientific objectives were established at the outset for the Apollo Project, although many scientists doubted that the missions would be worth the expense. The late Robert Jastrow, a nuclear physicist who led early NASA lunar science planning, wrote in his book "Journey to the Stars" that "My fellow scientists never liked the Apollo Project." He added that they "much preferred sending instruments into orbit" than people. Humans are expensive to keep alive in space, and their movements onboard a spacecraft can disturb delicate scientific equipment.  

Prior to Apollo, scientists were divided about the nature of the moon, said G. Jeffrey Taylor, a planetary geosciences professor at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu. Some experts claimed the lunar surface was formed by volcanism, others thought it was molded by the impacts of thousands of meteoroids, and some, like physicist Harold Urey, a Nobel laureate, contended that the moon was a cold, dead world with a surface of primordial materials from the era when the solar system formed, about 4.5 billion years ago.  

Urey's view was adopted by NASA's Jastrow, who contended that the lunar surface should be explored as the "Rosetta Stone of the solar system." If the moon had formed cold as Urey claimed, there were no volcanoes to erupt and disturb the surface, no forces to fold the crust and throw up mountains, and, since there is no liquid water nor any  wind, no erosion to alter the landscape. All of those effects obliterated the original surface of the Earth over geologic time, leaving no trace of its original condition. So if Apollo could collect rocks from the lunar surface, they supposedly would reveal the nature of moon when it formed, and perhaps what the newborn Earth was like as well.   

But Urey and Jastrow were wrong. Lunar soil gathered by the first men on the moon, Neil Armstrong and Edwin "Buzz" Aldrin of the Apollo 11 mission, hinted that the moon was anything but a primordial body, a conclusion confirmed from later samples and studies. In the soil, composed largely of broken shards of dark rock, there were white fragments of a different substance that hinted at the real history of the moon. The white rock -- which is also less dense than the dark material -- is now understood as evidence that soon after the moon formed, something melted the whole lunar surface. A brief era of very intense bombardment by asteroids and meteoroids may have done the trick.  

The molten rock layer extended down at least 60 miles, perhaps a great deal deeper. In this "magma ocean" layer, the original moon rock was destroyed and new minerals crystallized as magma cooled. This created the light, white rock, which rose to the top as denser rock sank into the depths of the moon. Any trace of the primordial lunar surface was destroyed. Later, large asteroids collided with the moon at intervals, creating huge impact basins and weakening the crust where, even later, dark lava would well up from the still hot lunar interior. This made the dark, flat lunar maria or seas such as the Sea of Tranquility, where Apollo 11 landed. Rough terrains of the white crustal rock, called lunar highlands, remain and are the likely sources of white rock chips at Tranquility Base and elsewhere.  

Taylor said that Apollo solved the mystery of how the moon's surface formed and "revolutionized our whole view of the solar system."

A half century after Kennedy initiated the , scientists are still studying the moon, currently with robotic spacecraft. During Apollo, astronauts circling the moon in a command module discovered a puzzling sight, moon dust rising well above the , although there is no wind to loft it. Vondrak, now the project scientist for NASA's lunar reconnaissance orbiter, said that the orbiter will gather new data on the strange dust phenomenon this summer.

Meanwhile, politicians, engineers, scientists and astronauts disagree about what NASA should do next for human spaceflight.

"We should use the moon of Mars, Phobos to assemble a base," said Aldrin, pausing in a busy week of appearances at events marking the anniversary. That base could be installed afterward on the surface of Mars.

Some experts favor returning to the as a stepping stone for a human voyage to Mars and back, but those plans have bogged down due to inadequate funding. Others call for a journey to an asteroid.

Many scientists, as in Jastrow's day, prefer for NASA to concentrate on .  

John C. Brandt, a retired NASA division chief who worked on the Hubble Space Telescope, said he thinks the expense of manned missions makes robotic missions superior, but acknowledges that "I was the principal investigator of a Hubble instrument that was rescued by astronauts." 

Explore further: Up, up and away, in the name of science education

Related Stories

NASA honors Apollo moon walker Buzz Aldrin

Mar 17, 2006

NASA will honor former astronaut Buzz Aldrin for his involvement in the U.S. space program with the presentation of the Ambassador of Exploration Award.

NASA listens to Apollo-era scientists

Jul 10, 2007

The National Aeronautics and Space Administration plans to celebrate the 38th anniversary of the first moon landing by reuniting retired scientists.

NASA Ames Leads Robotic Lunar Exploration Program

Nov 17, 2005

On Monday, the 36th anniversary of Apollo 12, the second manned lunar landing, NASA announced that it has assigned management of its Robotic Lunar Exploration Program to NASA Ames Research Center in California's Silicon Valley. ...

Image: Apollo 16: Footsteps Under High Sun

Jul 08, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- The lunar module Orion landed in the Descartes Highlands of the moon on April 21, 1972. The Apollo 16 mission targeted a highland region. Originally thought to be a volcanic site, the samples ...

Apollo 8: Christmas on the moon

Dec 22, 2010

Christmas Eve, 1968. As one of the most turbulent, tragic years in American history drew to a close, millions around the world were watching and listening as the Apollo 8 astronauts -- Frank Borman, Jim Lovell ...

Recommended for you

Up, up and away, in the name of science education

12 hours ago

US researchers extol the virtues of high-altitude balloons for science education in a research paper published in the International Journal of Learning Technology. According to Jeremy Straub of the University of North Dakota ...

New plan proposed to send humans to Mars

13 hours ago

A new, cost-constrained U.S. strategy to send humans on Mars, could be achieved within projected NASA budgets by minimizing new developments and relying mainly on already available or planned NASA assets. ...

'Cause unknown' in SpaceX rocket blast

15 hours ago

SpaceX came up empty Monday in its search to figure out why an unmanned Falcon 9 rocket exploded minutes after blasting off from a NASA launchpad with a load of space-bound cargo.

SOFIA points telescope toward Pluto occultation

19 hours ago

The Stratosphere Observatory for Infrared Astronomy (SOFIA) is a modified Boeing 747SP aircraft that makes celestial observations with its German-built 100-inch telescope. The telescope is enhanced to collect ...

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

1 / 5 (2) May 25, 2011
I was a graduate student in 1961 and remember the speech well.

I was in the 2nd year of a life-long research career dedicated to using the scientific method to reveal the origin of the Solar System and its elements.

Thanks to generous support for space research, and this surprising discovery at the University of Chicago in 1975:


We were able to show that the Earth and the other material orbiting the Sun were ejected from it in a supernova explosion ~5 Gyr ago [1], as shown here:


1. "Xenon record of the early solar system", Nature 262, 28-32 (1976); "Strange xenon, extinct super-heavy elements, and the solar neutrino puzzle", Science 195, 208-209 (1977); "Isotopes of tellurium, xenon and krypton in the Allende meteorite retain record of nucleosynthesis", Nature 277, 615-620 (1979).

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA PI for Apollo

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.