Human impacts of rising oceans will extend well beyond coasts
Identifying the human impact of rising sea levels is far more complex than just looking at coastal cities on a map.
Rather, estimates that are based on current, static population data can greatly misrepresent the true extent and the pronounced variability of the human toll of climate change, say University of Wisconsin-Madison researchers.
"Not all places and not all people in those places will be impacted equally," says Katherine Curtis, an assistant professor of community and environmental sociology at UW-Madison.
In a new online report, which will publish in an upcoming issue of the peer-reviewed journal Population and Environment, Curtis and her colleague Annemarie Schneider examine the impacts of rising oceans as one element of how a changing climate will affect humans. "We're linking economic and social vulnerability with environmental vulnerability to better understand which areas and their populations are most vulnerable," Curtis says.
They used existing climate projections and maps to identify areas at risk of inundation from rising sea levels and storm surges, such as the one that breached New Orleans levees after Hurricane Katrina, then coupled those vulnerability assessments with projections for future populations.
It's a deceptively challenging process, the authors say. "Time scales for climate models and time scales for human demography are completely different," explains Schneider, part of the Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment at UW-Madison's Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies. "Future climate scenarios typically span 50 to 100 years or more. That's unreasonable for demographic projections, which are often conducted on the order of decades."
The current study works to better align population and climate data in both space and time, allowing the researchers to describe social and demographic dimensions of environmental vulnerability.
The analysis focuses on four regions they identified as highly susceptible to flooding: the tip of the Florida peninsula, coastal South Carolina, the northern New Jersey coastline, and the greater Sacramento region of northern California, areas that span a range of population demographics. (New Orleans was not included as a study site due to major population changes since the 2000 census.)
With help from the UW-Madison Applied Population Laboratory, the researchers used 2000 census data and current patterns of population change to predict future population demographics in those areas. By 2030, they report, more than 19 million people will be affected by rising sea levels just in their four study areas.
And many of those people may be in unexpected places. The case studies clearly reveal the importance of considering people's patterns of movement.
"No area is completely isolated, and migration networks are one of the ways we think about connections across places. Through these networks, environmental impacts will have a ripple effect," Curtis says.
In one example, if Florida floods, New York and Los Angeles will feel the effects in 2000, 14,000 people from three New York counties and another 5,500 from Los Angeles moved to Miami-Dade County, Fla. Under the environmental scenarios in the study, those people would have to remain where they started or move elsewhere, consequently shifting their resources and needs to new sites.
Curtis and Schneider designed their approach with an eye toward helping local authorities identify and best respond to their own needs.
"Adaptation and mitigation strategies are developed and implemented at a local level. Part of the problem with large-scale population and environmental impact estimates is that they mask the local variation that is necessary in order for a local area to effectively respond," Curtis says.
A population's demographic, social, and economic profile affects the ways in which people can respond to local disaster, she adds. For example, children or elderly require a different approach to evacuation and resettlement than a largely working-age population, while workers from the agricultural lands of northern California will face different post-displacement labor challenges than those from the industrial corridor of New Jersey.
Even using rough estimates of sea level rise, their analysis makes clear that planning ahead for mitigation and adaptation will be crucial, Schneider says.
"As we anticipate future events, future natural disasters, we've learned how dramatic it can be and there are things that can be done in advance to mitigate the extent of damage in a location," Curtis says.
Provided by
University of Wisconsin-Madison
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
Hypothetical desert earth
9 hours ago
-
More human population = greater mass?
May 25, 2012
-
Conversion from aircraft bearing to normal degrees
May 23, 2012
-
Interpretation/Analysis of the Lab results(HEPA filter)
May 22, 2012
-
Has anyone here attended the The Urbino Summer School in Paleoclimatology?
May 22, 2012
-
Earthquakes: Mag 6 N. Italy and Mag 5.6 W. Bulgaria
May 21, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - Earth
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (20) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
2
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
2
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (6) |
0
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 27, 2011
Rank: 2.8 / 5 (13)
this is kind of like doing the science of maybes...
as if "what if" comix were real
May 27, 2011
Rank: 3.2 / 5 (9)
Give me evidence that it is not rising.
May 27, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (9)
May 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Or was it 7 feet?? Agg its late, look it up on google i would say.
May 27, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (12)
Yes, it has become very fashionable and lucrative for climatologists to ignore the well-known, natural variability of Earth's heat source - the Sun [1,2].
1. "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate",
Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)
http://arxiv.org/.../0501441
2. "Earth's Heat Source - The Sun", Energy and Environment 20, 131-144 (2009)
http://arxiv.org/pdf/0905.0704
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
May 28, 2011
Rank: 3.3 / 5 (8)
It has done so for at least millions of years and quite possibly billions of years.
We are in a warming period and have not as yet reached the peak of that warming period.
The question is not and should not be is our planet warming, (because it is warming as part of the planets natural cycle) but rather what influence, if any, are we having on this natural process.
We are not capable of stopping it but we may well be capable of accelerating it.
That is what we need to know.
And to what extent are we capable of accelerating it.
Plus if we contain our pollution will it have any detectable effect upon this natural cycle.
I suspect that the answer will be no.
That any acceleration we may have contributed to will remain as part of the cycle, i.e. we cannot extract it.
The best I think we can do is to not further add to the acceleration of the warming process.
May 28, 2011
Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
http://www.skepti...iate.htm
http://www.skepti...ions.htm
May 29, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
http://stevengodd...-colors/
May 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Looking at the link you provided shows 6 different measurements, one which doesn't agree. I can understand why you would cherry pick the one that disagrees, but don't you feel a little slimy about it? Normally, data is averaged together, and there is certainly a long term linear trend of sea level rises as shown by ShotmanMasio's links. Whats scary is that the measured rises are at the very top end of climate model projections.
May 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Only 3 are functional today and all 3 show a drop.
Many scaremongers predict a 1 meter rise by 2100. That would require 10mm per year of sea level rise.
The average rise of 2.7mm is short 7.3mm per year and 73mm behind the needed pace to make 1 meter by 2100.
Of course now that sea level has dropped ... it is even farther behind.
May 30, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
For instance, you can see in this University of Colorado graph that the trend is rising even with fluctuations along the way.
http://sealevel.colorado.edu/
Can you show me long-term trends that show this is wrong?
Or how about showing this one is wrong:
http://www.aviso....-images/
I will be waiting for your scholarly data to show that you are not just lying.
May 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Third measurement in 2004 - 2004.0630 27.604
Third measurement in 2011 - 2011.0673 30.809
3.2mm in 7 years.
http://sealevel.c...obal.txt
That link is the Raw Data link on YOUR referenced page. Didn't you read it??????
To rise 1 meter (1000mm) in 100 years you need 10mm a year.
Not .45mm a year over the last 7 years.
I'm not lying. I actually looked at the data ... you should try it.
May 30, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
Absolutely shameless cherry picking. I am surprised you would even try this. Let me cherry pick:
2010.9587 38.030
2004.5789 17.311
The difference is now 20.719 mm in 6 years just by changing the dates slightly. That is the reason that they use averaging to eliminate the noise. At the present time the average by multiple sources is about 3.2 mm/year, not in 7 years.
Using your logic that would be about 320 mm over the next century. However, the is not taking into account that the increase is not expected to be linear. So, you are cherry picking data (as expected) and do not understand statistics (as expected). You also, apparently, don't understand the concept of feedback. I think you need to do a little more reading before you try to make this lie stick.
Please show an example to support your idea that sea level is not rising based on someones statistics and not your cherry picked instantaneous arithmetic.
May 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I then went back and looked at the 3rd entry for 2004.
You have to compare the same time each year because of seasonal differences.
No cherry picking.
Why would you want to compare different months?