Galaxy Evolution Explorer finds dark energy repulsive

May 20, 2011
New results from NASA's Galaxy Evolution Explorer and the Anglo-Australian Telescope atop Siding Spring Mountain in Australia confirm that dark energy (represented by purple grid) is a smooth, uniform force that now dominates over the effects of gravity (green grid). The observations follow from careful measurements of the separations between pairs of galaxies (examples of such pairs are illustrated here).Image credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech

(PhysOrg.com) -- A five-year survey of 200,000 galaxies, stretching back seven billion years in cosmic time, has led to one of the best independent confirmations that dark energy is driving our universe apart at accelerating speeds.

A five-year survey of 200,000 , stretching back seven billion years in cosmic time, has led to one of the best independent confirmations that dark energy is driving our apart at accelerating speeds.

The survey used data from NASA's space-based and the Anglo-Australian Telescope on Siding Spring Mountain in Australia.

The findings offer new support for the favored theory of how dark energy works – as a constant force, uniformly affecting the universe and propelling its runaway expansion. They contradict an alternate theory, where gravity, not dark energy, is the force pushing space apart. According to this alternate theory, with which the new survey results are not consistent, Albert Einstein's concept of gravity is wrong, and gravity becomes repulsive instead of attractive when acting at great distances.

"The action of dark energy is as if you threw a ball up in the air, and it kept speeding upward into the sky faster and faster," said Chris Blake of the Swinburne University of Technology in Melbourne, Australia. Blake is lead author of two papers describing the results that appeared in recent issues of the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. "The results tell us that dark energy is a cosmological constant, as Einstein proposed. If gravity were the culprit, then we wouldn't be seeing these constant effects of dark energy throughout time."

Dark energy is thought to dominate our universe, making up about 74 percent of it. Dark matter, a slightly less mysterious substance, accounts for 22 percent. So-called normal matter, anything with atoms, or the stuff that makes up living creatures, planets and stars, is only approximately four percent of the cosmos.

The idea of dark energy was proposed during the previous decade, based on studies of distant exploding stars called supernovae. Supernovae emit constant, measurable light, making them so-called "standard candles," which allows calculation of their distance from Earth. Observations revealed dark energy was flinging the objects out at accelerating speeds.

The new survey provides two separate methods for independently checking these results. This is the first time astronomers performed these checks across the whole cosmic timespan dominated by dark energy. Astronomers began by assembling the largest three-dimensional map of galaxies in the distant universe, spotted by the Galaxy Evolution Explorer.

"The Galaxy Evolution Explorer helped identify bright, young galaxies, which are ideal for this type of study," said Christopher Martin, principal investigator for the mission at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena. "It provided the scaffolding for this enormous 3-D map."

The team acquired detailed information about the light for each galaxy using the Anglo-Australian Telescope and studied the pattern of distance between them. Sound waves from the very early universe left imprints in the patterns of galaxies, causing pairs of galaxies to be separated by approximately 500 million light-years.

Blake and his colleagues used this "standard ruler" to determine the distance from the galaxy pairs to Earth. As with the supernovae studies, this distance data was combined with information about the speeds the pairs are moving away from us, revealing, yet again, the fabric of space is stretching apart faster and faster.

The team also used the galaxy map to study how clusters of galaxies grow over time like cities, eventually containing many thousands of galaxies. The clusters attract new galaxies through gravity, but dark energy tugs the clusters apart. It slows down the process, allowing scientists to measure dark energy's repulsive force.

"Observations by astronomers over the last 15 years have produced one of the most startling discoveries in physical science; the expansion of the universe, triggered by the big bang, is speeding up," said Jon Morse, astrophysics division director at Headquarters in Washington. "Using entirely independent methods, data from the Galaxy Evolution Explorer have helped increase our confidence in the existence of ."

Explore further: How baryon acoustic oscillation reveals the expansion of the universe

More information: www.nasa.gov/galex

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Aussie galaxy survey to lead to 'new physics'

Dec 08, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Australian astronomers have released the first set of data from the first project to look at the effects of "dark energy" halfway back in the Universe's lifetime.

Dark energy -- 10 years on

Nov 30, 2007

Three quarters of our universe is made up of some weird, gravitationally repulsive substance that was only discovered ten years ago – dark energy. This month in Physics World, Eric Linder and Saul Perlmutter, both at the ...

Recommended for you

The Great Cold Spot in the cosmic microwave background

19 hours ago

The cosmic microwave background (CMB) is the thermal afterglow of the primordial fireball we call the big bang. One of the striking features of the CMB is how remarkably uniform it is. Still, there are some ...

Mystery of rare five-hour space explosion explained

Sep 17, 2014

Next week in St. Petersburg, Russia, scientists on an international team that includes Penn State University astronomers will present a paper that provides a simple explanation for mysterious ultra-long gamma-ray ...

User comments : 8

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

omatumr
1 / 5 (9) May 20, 2011
The driving force is neutron repulsion, as explained here:

"Is the Universe Expanding?"
The Journal of Cosmology 13, 4187-4190 (2011):

http://journalofc...102.html

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
omatumr
1 / 5 (8) May 20, 2011
Neutron repulsion is explained in more detail by the Cradle of the Nuclides and these papers [1-3]:

Cradle of the Nuclides:

www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm

1. "Attraction and repulsion of nucleons:
Sources of stellar energy"
Journal of Fusion Energy 19, 93-98 (2001)

www.omatumr.com/a...tnuc.pdf

2. "Super-fluidity in the solar interior:
Implications for solar eruptions and climate",
Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)

http://arxiv.org/.../0501441

3. "Neutron Repulsion", The
APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages (2011)

http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
71STARS
1 / 5 (5) May 20, 2011
Until you know the CAUSE of Dark Matter, to assume that it has any "dark energy" is on the road to failure and fantasy. Why isn't emphasis put on finding the cause? Try Dwyer's Theory on the Cause of Dark Matter. It is only a theory, but it does address the CAUSE. Once you acquire the sequence of events that is producing "dark matter" on a continuing basis, only then will you be able to predict what it does.
71STARS
4.2 / 5 (5) May 20, 2011
@Omatumr: Can you please state what neutron repulsion has to do with dark matter? Your quest to implicate this action into everything above and beyond stellar is quite annoying UNLESS you have a statement to address what neutron repulsion has to do with dark matter or dark energy whatsoever. Thanking you.
RobertKarlStonjek
2 / 5 (7) May 21, 2011
These findings do not prove the existence of Dark Energy as such, but do prove that the Big Bang model without Dark Energy could not possibly be right in any form.

If it were any other Physics Model we'd ditch it and start again. But in the case of Big Bang Models, the assumption is that the model is right and that any errors in the model, no matter how big, must be explained by mysterious forces.

This is identical to the attitude that propelled religious beliefs and Aristotelian theory. If religious predictions proved incorrect then evil or lack of faith must be afoot, probably in the believer. Contradictions to Aristotelian theory were thought to be the fault of the investigator or the interpretation of results, after all, Aristotle was assumed to be right.

...continued below...
RobertKarlStonjek
2.4 / 5 (8) May 21, 2011
And now we see the same error repeated in the Big Bang Model. The model is right by fiat and so any failure in predictions of inconsistencies in the model must be explained using whatever means is necessary, even to declaring that the pre-dark matter/energy BB model only explained 4% of the universe.

When James Webb images objects well beyond the supposed beginning of space and time will the Big Bang be dumped? Or will another 'just so' story be contrived to explain the 'anomaly' eg 'Dark Time'.
71STARS
1 / 5 (3) May 21, 2011
The "Big Bang Theory" came into vogue in 1929-30. There was thinking before that time and there will be thinking after this time. Kant theorized the Nebular hypothesis, Solar System formed from a large cloud of gas, a nebula (1755). George Gamow theorized a star formed from a teardrop of gas (1950s). Lemaitre had an atom-seed-egg explode in 1929.
R.L. Dwyer theorizes a First Star to seed the universe in 2008.

There is no satisfaction in the big bang simply because Time and Temperature do not create a sequence of events. There are too many unanswered gaps. So, where is the replacement for this 1929 theory?




raykelly1940
1 / 5 (1) May 22, 2011
I feel that dark energy is anti matter, we cannot see it as wear as matter gives out energy and light, anti matter draws it in, although if there are anti matter galaxies, time must run backwards to ours, and as every thing in creation seems to be in balance,there must be a roughly equal amount as there is matter or energy?