Flipping hot Jupiters: Why some planets orbit the wrong way
The transiting giant planet orbits very close to the star and in a direction opposite to the stellar rotation. This peculiar configuration results from gravitational perturbations by another much more distant planet (upper left). Credit: Credit: Lynette Cook
(PhysOrg.com) -- In the last few years astronomers have observed that in some extrasolar systems the star is spinning one way and the planet, a "hot Jupiter," is orbiting the star in the opposite direction. A Northwestern University research team is the first to model how these huge planets got so close to their stars -- thanks to gravitational perturbations by a much more distant planet -- and how the planets' orbits can flip in the process.
More than 500 extrasolar planets -- planets that orbit stars other than the sun -- have been discovered since 1995. But only in the last few years have astronomers observed that in some of these systems the star is spinning one way and the planet, a "hot Jupiter," is orbiting the star in the opposite direction.
"That's really weird, and it's even weirder because the planet is so close to the star," said Frederic A. Rasio, a theoretical astrophysicist at Northwestern University. "How can one be spinning one way and the other orbiting exactly the other way? It's crazy. It so obviously violates our most basic picture of planet and star formation."
Figuring out how these huge planets got so close to their stars led Rasio and his research team to also explain their flipped orbits. Using large-scale computer simulations, they are the first to model how a hot Jupiter's orbit can flip and go in the direction opposite to the star's spin. Gravitational perturbations by a much more distant planet result in the hot Jupiter having both a "wrong way" and a very close orbit. (A hot Jupiter is a huge Jupiter-like planet in very close proximity to the central star.)
"Once you get more than one planet, the planets perturb each other gravitationally," Rasio said. "This becomes interesting because that means whatever orbit they were formed on isn't necessarily the orbit they will stay on forever. These mutual perturbations can change the orbits, as we see in these extrasolar systems."
Details of the study will be published May 12 by the journal Nature.
In explaining the peculiar configuration of an extrasolar system, the researchers also have added to our general understanding of planetary system formation and evolution and reflected on what their findings mean for the solar system.
"We had thought our solar system was typical in the universe, but from day one everything has looked weird in the extrasolar planetary systems," Rasio said. "That makes us the odd ball really. Learning about these other systems provides a context for how special our system is. We certainly seem to live in a special place."
Rasio, a professor of physics and astronomy in Northwestern's Weinberg College of Arts and Sciences is the senior author of the paper. The first author is Smadar Naoz, a postdoctoral fellow at Northwestern and a Gruber Fellow.
The physics the research team used to solve the problem is basically orbital mechanics, Rasio said, the same kind of physics NASA uses to send satellites around the solar system.
"It was a beautiful problem," said Naoz, "because the answer was there for us for so long. It's the same physics, but no one noticed it could explain hot Jupiters and flipped orbits."
"Doing the calculations was not obvious or easy," Rasio said, "Some of the approximations used by others in the past were really not quite right. We were doing it right for the first time in 50 years, thanks in large part to the persistence of Smadar."
"It takes a smart, young person who first can do the calculations on paper and develop a full mathematical model and then turn it into a computer program that solves the equations," Rasio added. "This is the only way we can produce real numbers to compare to the actual measurements taken by astronomers."
In their model, the researchers assume a star similar to the sun, and a system with two planets. The inner planet is a gas giant similar to Jupiter, and initially it is far from the star, where Jupiter-type planets are thought to form. The outer planet is also fairly large and is farther from the star than the first planet. It interacts with the inner planet, perturbing it and shaking up the system.
The effects on the inner planet are weak but build up over a very long period of time, resulting in two significant changes in the system: the inner gas giant orbits very close to the star and its orbit is in the opposite direction of the central star's spin. The changes occur, according to the model, because the two orbits are exchanging angular momentum, and the inner one loses energy via strong tides.
The gravitational coupling between the two planets causes the inner planet to go into an eccentric, needle-shaped orbit. It has to lose a lot of angular momentum, which it does by dumping it onto the outer planet. The inner planet's orbit gradually shrinks because energy is dissipated through tides, pulling in close to the star and producing a hot Jupiter. In the process, the orbit of the planet can flip.
Only about a quarter of astronomers' observations of these hot Jupiter systems show flipped orbits. The Northwestern model needs to be able to produce both flipped and non-flipped orbits, and it does, Rasio said.
More information: "Hot Jupiters From Secular PlanetPlanet Interactions" Nature (2011)
Provided by
Northwestern University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (20) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
2
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
2
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (6) |
0
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
May 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 11, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (9)
May 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
No. IIRC, they are randomly inclined, which is why Doppler exo-planet detection techniques can only give an upper limit to their mass. eg "M sin i < 10 MJup"
You need to do a lot of careful spectroscopy to figure out the actual axis direction.
This angle issue also applies to the 'transit' method of detection, which can only pick up ~10% of 'hot jupiters' and even less if they're further out...
May 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 11, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
That would explain why the hot jupiter's have migrated so close to their host stars however, I think I have a reasonable hypothesis for this behavior.
The majority of stars surveyed in star forming regions are binary or trinary. It is suspected that most stars are formed in large groups of greater than 3 and slowly shift apart as they revolve around the galaxy. It would be reasonable to me to discover that 'planet trading' may be a common aspect as one approaches more densely populated star regions.
May 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
May 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
1) I think this would reasonably explain the closeness of these planets to the star, but I do not at all see how this explains the flip?
2) If the effects of multiple planets in a system is really that great, why the heck is our's so darn stable with a record 8 1/2 planets?
May 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
We also have a lot of evidence that the stability of our system is the result of a multitude of catastrophic events as evidenced by the status of Neptune, Venus, Mercury, and Uranus.
May 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
May 11, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (2)
What about the extrasolar planets discovered earlier?
Extrasolar planets were first discovered in 1992 [1].
They were confirmed in 1994 [2].
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
1. A. Wolszczan and D. Frail (1992). "A planetary system around the millisecond pulsar PSR1257 + 12". Nature 355 (6356): 145147.
2. A. Wolszczan (1994). "Confirmation of Earth Mass Planets Orbiting the Millisecond Pulsar PSR B1257+12". Science 264 (5158): 538542.
May 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
2) planetary orbits are strongly modeled by the kepler equations and more strongly by adding in gravity of other large objects and A LOT of trigonometry to boot
Jupiter isin't moving closer because it has enough momentum to be perfectly happy where it is... now if it takes on more mass it will move a little closer to the sun and we all ( the other planets ) will adjust.
the biggest reason we are so stable is that our orbit around the milky way doesn't take us too close to any other stars
May 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
May 11, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 11, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
@paul - I suppose the true definition of backward orbit would be antegrade to the star's rotation, but I'm not sure they are capable of determining that. The article states that they are comparing two planets in a system and have determined that they are orbiting opposite each other, so one is *definitely* orbiting 'backwards'.
Only?? I'm fairly sure that a quarter of the systems is a huge amount compared to expectations.
May 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
May 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
And at that point it can pass close to the outer planet, whose gravitational pull can supply the energy needed.
In doing so the outer planet is boosted to a higher orbit by conservation of angular momentum.
You are correct that if the tranfer robs the inner planet of all of its angular momentum, it will fall into the central star (Jupiter does this to comets on a fairly frequent basis).
But if the transfer is more than the inner planet's angular momentum before the encounter, then the inner planet will end up with a retrograde orbit.
May 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Wether 8 planets is a lot or nor is something we don't know. currently we can only detect planets which fit very specific criteria (either very massive or massive and close to the parent star or the plane of rotation happens to be just so aligned so that we see it edge on)
If we were to sctutinize a planetary system like ours from afar we would probably not detect any planets with current methods.
Direction of revolution. An opposite direction of rotation isn't totally unheard of (e.g. Venus, Uranus (and Pluto) rotate in the opposite direction from what is considered 'usual')
May 12, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Like Johannes1 said - they need to come up with lots of complicated explanations because the current planetary formation model is simply totally inadequate. Questions arise quickly:
1. How did the planet start migrating inwards from where it supposedly formed?
2. What stopped it from crashing into the star?
3. Where did that initial pertubation come from in the first place and can they actually still observe it? It should still be there, given their assumption that it happened over a long period of time.
More like major miracles, you mean.
May 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Not necessarily. Think about a planet rotating around a star. Now start tipping the plane of rotation - for whatever reason. If you tip it 180 degrees then you will end up with a retrograde orbit and the planet never having changed its speed. a 'swing-by' of another massive object could do the trick.
Many reasons are possible:
- Collisons which chang the momentum
- The stellar system moved through a dust cloud which caused 'friction losses'
- Near misses or gravitational interaction with other planets, stars....
Simple celestial mechanics: If the angular momentum isn't reduced to exactly zero it will just go to a lower orbit and stay there.
See the answer to 1. - most of which we can't observe directly
May 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 12, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Get an education so someone with knowledge like myself won't be able to scam you out of your cash and free time.
May 12, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (3)