How did debt and credit become the 'American way'?

May 09, 2011

Taking on significant debt has become "normal"—and even patriotic—to some consumers, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research.

"How did America, a country once so indelibly marked with Puritan principles of self-discipline and thrift, become a nation so awash in personal ?" ask authors Lisa Peñaloza (École des Hautes Études Commerciales du Nord—EDHEC) and Michelle Barnhart (Oregon State University).

The researchers interviewed 27 white, middle-class Americans before the 2008 financial crisis and found that even though believe that they should limit their debt, they take on debt because doing so has become normal. "As one participant put it, taking on debt is 'the American way,'" the authors write.

For many participants, the disconnect between what consumers say they should do and what they actually do begins in young adulthood. "When their parents did talk about credit/debt, it was to counsel them to use credit only in emergencies," the authors write. "In contrast, these study participants viewed debt as acceptable and necessary for middle class Americans who 'have to' buy a house, furnishings, a college education, and a car—items most cannot afford without credit."

Participants recognized the value of a good credit history and understood that they needed to use credit to build one. "The only one who had avoided credit in an attempt to live within her means found it impossible to be a 'normal consumer' without it, recalling that she had been denied a cell phone and had difficulty when traveling because she did not have a credit card," the authors write.

Although consumers generally tried to use credit responsibly, some participants "gamed" credit by taking out multiple cards, rolling over balances, and amassing large debts. "So long as these consumers consistently paid at least the minimum amount required, financial agents rewarded them with higher credit limits and even mortgages," the authors write.

"Spurred on by tax rebates, prominent among which is the mortgage tax deduction, ambition to get ahead, and social pressure to build wealth, study participants accumulated debt to demonstrate financial independence and express freedom, and some participants even cast their use as a patriotic duty to boost the national economy," the authors conclude.

Explore further: Study shows banks that have good working relationships with their customers reduce loan defaults

More information: Lisa Peñaloza and Michelle Barnhart. "Living U.S. Capitalism: The Normalization of Credit/Debt." Journal of Consumer Research: December 2011 (published online April 5, 2011). Further information: ejcr.org

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

How American consumers view debt: a case study

Apr 19, 2011

A new study published this month suggests that while younger Americans are more smitten with credit cards and debt than older Americans, the older generation helps enable their children by encouraging use of credit as a "safety ...

Researcher says Chinese credit market remains underdeveloped

Aug 03, 2010

The Chinese government has made several reforms to its economic policies in recent years. Despite these reforms, a new study shows that Chinese households are not utilizing their credit market to its fullest extent. Rui Yao, ...

Consumers and their rights: A new study from Australia

May 18, 2010

Consumers tend to be cynical about the motivations of credit card companies, yet they lack the time or motivation to engage in political action to protect their rights, according to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Re ...

People more likely to overestimate their credit quality

Jun 02, 2008

A new study published in the Journal of Consumer Affairs examined consumers' self-assessments of their credit rating and found that respondents were more likely to believe they had average or above average credit and those ...

Recommended for you

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

xznofile
5 / 5 (3) May 09, 2011
a better question is how to control institutions that demand it.
ryggesogn2
2.7 / 5 (6) May 09, 2011
It is called socialism and began with the govt control of the money supply in 1912 and its withdrawal from a gold standard in the 30s.
SteveL
4 / 5 (1) May 10, 2011
It is called socialism and began with the govt control of the money supply in 1912 and its withdrawal from a gold standard in the 30s.

That's only part of it. Our society has a built in and legalized cushion with different types of bankrupsy / forgiveness programs that throws the burden of our individual irresponsibility back onto businesses which in turn pass that same burden back onto the other members of society. This loss of accountability has enabled us to take risks we shouldn't bacause we have protections in place that at one time would have required that we literally lose everything, or go into debitor's prison. Corporations have added significantly to this by doing their very best to get us to buy all of their product we possibly can. Lending institutions often pay loan officers by how much they loan out, not by how much they should be loaning out safely. Lastly, the educational system has done a poor job of educating us concerning home or personal economics.
Skeptic_Heretic
5 / 5 (1) May 11, 2011
It is called socialism and began with the govt control of the money supply in 1912 and its withdrawal from a gold standard in the 30s.

Actually it's trickle down economics that drove the rise of credit after the SnL failure.

The closure of the gold window came in the 70's and it was a Republican measure because France caught us cheating on the value of the dollar.