Most complete 3-D map of local universe unveiled

May 25, 2011

Most complete 3-D map of local universe unveiled

Enlarge

The 2MASS Redshift Survey (2MRS) has catalogued more than 43,000 galaxies within 380 million light-years from Earth (z<0.09). In this projection, the plane of the Milky Way runs horizontally across the center of the image. 2MRS is notable for extending closer to the Galactic plane than previous surveys - a region that's generally obscured by dust. Credit: T.H. Jarrett (IPAC/SSC)

(PhysOrg.com) -- Today, astronomers unveiled the most complete 3-D map of the local universe (out to a distance of 380 million light-years) ever created. Taking more than 10 years to complete, the 2MASS Redshift Survey (2MRS) also is notable for extending closer to the galactic plane than previous surveys -- a region that’s generally obscured by dust.

Karen Masters (University of Portsmouth, UK) presented the new today in a press conference at the 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society.

“The 2MASS Redshift Survey is a wonderfully complete new look at the local -- particularly near the galactic plane,” Masters said. “We’re also honoring the legacy of the late John Huchra, an astronomer at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, who was a guiding force behind this and earlier galaxy redshift surveys.”

A galaxy’s light is redshifted, or stretched to longer wavelengths, by the expansion of the universe. The farther the galaxy, the greater its redshift, so redshift measurements yield galaxy distances -- the vital third dimension in a 3-D map.

The Two-Micron All-Sky Survey (2MASS) scanned the entire sky in three near-infrared wavelength bands using two highly automated telescopes, one at the Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory on Mt. Hopkins, AZ, and one at the Cerro Tololo Inter-American Observatory in Chile. Near-infrared light penetrates intervening dust better than visible
light, allowing for a more complete survey.

Robert Kirshner, Huchra’s colleague at the Center for Astrophysics (CfA), said, “John loved doing redshift surveys and he loved the infrared. He had the insight to tell when infrared technology, formerly the province of the experts, was ripe for routine use in a big project.”

“John was instrumental in setting up the 2MASS telescope at Mount Hopkins, seeing the infrared side of the project through, and making a much more complete survey of the local universe. It’s a wonderful tribute to John that his colleagues have finished the infrared-selected galaxy redshift survey that John started,” he added.

The 2MRS mapped in detail areas previously hidden behind our Milky Way to better understand the impact they have on our motion. The motion of the Milky Way with respect to the rest of the universe has been a puzzle ever since were first able to measure it and found it couldn’t be explained by the gravitational attraction from any
visible matter. Massive local structures, like the Hydra-Centaurus region (the “Great Attractor”) were previously hidden almost behind the Milky Way but are now shown in great detail by 2MRS.

Provided by Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics search and more info website

4.6 /5 (14 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

finitesolutions
May 25, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Where can i buy this map? Or how to access it?
jscroft
May 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
I'm pretty certain this is it: http://www.ipac.c...dex.html
omatumr
May 25, 2011

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (21)
Karen Masters (University of Portsmouth, UK) presented the new map today in a press conference at the 218th meeting of the American Astronomical Society.


Congratulations, Karen ! Even closer to home, right here in the solar system itself, . . .

About 13 years and 4 months ago at the 191st AAS meeting in Washington, DC, Dr. Dan Goldin (NASA Administrator) ordered the release of xenon isotope data from the Galileo probe of Jupiter's atmosphere in 1995.

The data confirmed [1] that Earth's heat source is NOT a ball of hydrogen, but the iron-rich remains of the supernova that gave birth to the solar system, as reported 15 years earlier [2].

1. "Isotopic ratios in Jupiter confirm intra-solar diffusion", Meteoritics and Planetary Science 33, A97, 5011 (1998).

http://www.lpi.us...5011.pdf

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
El_Nose
May 25, 2011

Rank: 4.5 / 5 (16)
OMATUMR

-- You can't send links to your own papers!!!!!!

and if you are going to send a link -- have it link to the page that holds the link to the paper instead of straight to the paper itself to add credibility to trying to at least seem that someone impartial voted your paper worthy of acceptance...

Dude your paper refernces 8 other papers -- of which you wrote 4 -- not very pratical
omatumr
May 25, 2011

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (18)
About 40 years after lunar soil samples were collected in 1969-1972, the global climate scandal began in the fall of 2009 with the public release of e-mail messages and charges that some were trying to "manipulate the science, so that their viewpoints are the only ones that reach the policymakers."

www.cbsnews.com/8...383.html

Evidence of solar mass fractionation across isotopes of the two heaviest noble gases, Kr (element #36) and Xe (element #54), in lunar soils collected in 1972 are shown here:

www.omatumr.com/D...ata1.htm

The average solar mass fractionation, measured across the nine stable isotopes of xenon, are 3.5% per mass unit. This corresponds to nine-stages of mass-dependent fractionation.

Nine-stages (9-stages) of mass-dependent fractionation enriches the H/Fe ratio (at the top of the photosphere by ~73,594,629 (56^9x0.5 = 56^4.5).

With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA PI for Apollo
omatumr
May 25, 2011

Rank: 1.9 / 5 (14)
OMATUMR

-- You can't send links to your own papers!!!!!!

and if you are going to send a link -- have it link to the page that holds the link to the paper instead of straight to the paper itself to add credibility to trying to at least seem that someone impartial voted your paper worthy of acceptance...

Dude your paper refernces 8 other papers -- of which you wrote 4 -- not very pratical


Thanks, El_Nose.

Is it okay to cite papers in Science and Nature that first published evidence our Sun is not a ball of Hydrogen?

"Mass fractionation and isotope anomalies in neon and xenon," Nature 227, 1113-1116 (1970).

"Xenon in carbonaceous chondrites", Nature 240, 99-101 (1972)

"Xenon record of the early solar system", Nature 262, 28-32 (1976)

"Strange xenon, extinct super-heavy elements, and the solar neutrino puzzle", Science 195, 208-209 (1977)

"Isotopes of tellurium, xenon and krypton in the Allende meteorite retain record of nucleosynthesis", Nature 277, 615-620 (1979)
that_guy
May 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
So, I learned a lesson today. I downloaded this map and ran off to sight see in the fornax cluster. And you know what happened? it was all 10 million lightyears away from where the map said it would be. I had to make a hard right hand turn and backtrack all that way. This isn't a map of the local area. This is a map of what the local area looks like from a single point in space. Those guys never took into account the movement of the galaxies since the light was emitted hundreds of millions of years ago. What a waste of my day off.
yyz
May 25, 2011

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
"Where can i buy this map? Or how to access it?"

The link above by jscroft is to an earlier work. Here's a link to the image & caption: http://news.softp...r-2.jpg/

@guy, you sure you weren't in the Coma Cluster? :^)
jscroft
May 25, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
@yyz: Sweet! Thanks for the correction.
yyz
May 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
@jscroft, it's neat compare the two images side-by-side(but the projection chosen for each map differs[new map has the plane of the galaxy running horizontal along the central plane] and makes this not so simple!).
jscroft
May 25, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Yah, that IS cool. Astonishing the amount of work represented by those two images, isn't it?
woofwoofwoofoioioi
May 26, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
It confirms my predicts - the universe is definitely shaped like a Sherrin. Beyond any doubt!
Cynical1
May 26, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
It needs a "you are Here" caption pointer.
El_Nose
May 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Ahh the "you are here " would e the dead centre of the map --- by definition we ( humans) took the picture so we would be in the center looking out
TheRedComet
May 27, 2011

Rank: 2.6 / 5 (5)
omatumr
So you get your news from CBS the wonderful people that lied about Vietnam, The relationship between tobacco and cancer. They had Bernard Goldberg in there employment for 28 years ya this is where I would get my news from.

Lets talk about the leak that happened. Someone hacked in to the CRU at the University of East Anglia they used a word filter in order to take their work out of context and then made it public. This is your irrefutable evidence get real who has the most to lose by climate change and the most to gain by discrediting it Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil!!!
omatumr
May 27, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (8)
omatumr
So you get your news from CBS


Did you overlook the research papers cited above?

1. "Isotopic ratios in Jupiter confirm intra-solar diffusion", Meteoritics and Planetary Science 33, A97, 5011 (1998).

2. "Mass fractionation and isotope anomalies in neon and xenon," Nature 227, 1113-1116 (1970).

Etc.

6. "Isotopes of tellurium, xenon and krypton in the Allende meteorite retain record of nucleosynthesis", Nature 277, 615-620 (1979)

TheRedComet
May 27, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
I dont know did you just completely ignore me blowing a huge hole in one of your conspiracy theorys.
TheRedComet
May 27, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
You believe that the current assessment of the composition of the sun to be false. This is what i go by wouldnt a different iron composition be conflicting with the current solar mass unit.
TheRedComet
May 27, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Sorry I have trouble with links and stuff I think its the writer I use the this is what I use was a link to the standard composition of the sun.
that_guy
May 27, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
@ redcomet--There are a couple methods to link on physorg. You can drop the 'www' and type out the rest for example. wikipedia.com

I find the comment box freezes if I try to copy/paste, so I have to type it out.
--
as for mr manuels neutron core powered sun - Here's a reason why no one listens to him. The gravity of a neutron star is so high that it converts any material into degenerate matter - a point where thermodynamic laws no longer rule the physical processes.

The 'pressure' that keeps it from collapsing further is quantum in nature, rather than classical. Physics gets kind of twisty-cat. It is the fact that at a certain volume/density of space, two particles (Such as electrons) cannot hold the same quantum energy level. Therefore to compress it further, you have to add enough energy to fill ever higher quantum levels until for example, it takes less energy for the electron proton to bond and become a neutron, which is a new form of degenerate matter.

Continued
that_guy
May 27, 2011

Rank: 3.8 / 5 (8)
So what would happen if a neutron star accreted gas? it just turns it into more degenerate matter (Neutrons) and it shrinks paradoxically.

So, let's say that mr. Manuel is correct about neutron repulsion (Not that they repel, which is true in a sense, but they repel to a degree that makes the sun shine)

The repulsion of the neutrons would have to be high enough that it did not convert hydrogen, helium, etc into degenerate matter, or any element past iron...because it would kick off an endothermic nuclear reaction, and a catastrophic implosion, and presumably a black hole or supernova or both.

But if the neutron repulsion ensures that the neutron star is not dense enough to do that...then it is not dense enough to be a neutron star, and it would be standard matter, under the regular nuclear and thermodynamic laws.

And you don't even need a phd to understand it!

Source
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/degenerate_matter
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/neutron_star
omatumr
May 27, 2011

Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
And you don't even need a phd to understand it!


You are right. Probably anyone can grasp evidence that:

a.) Neutrons repel each other.
b.) The universe is fragmenting.
c.) Cores of galaxies and stars explode.
d.) Mass fractionation occurs in the Sun.
e.) The Sun and other ordinary stars make and discards H.

If they take the time to study the data and observations.

Advanced degrees will not help those who ignore the experimental experimental data summarized here [1,2]:

1. "Is the Universe Expanding?" The Journal of Cosmology 13, 4187-4190 (2011)

http://journalofc...102.html

2. "Neutron Repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages (2011)

http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
Na_Reth
May 27, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
I came up with this hypothesis, that blackholes can turn into pulsars.
TheRedComet
May 27, 2011

Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
Thanks for the help with the link issue.
But omatumr If I was to take your theory on how the star functions to be true you have still not addressed the missing massive gravity well.
omatumr
May 27, 2011

Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
Study the experimental data, if you want to learn, or ignore the data and continue to pretend that the universe is filled with ball of hydrogen.

The choice is yours.
omatumr
May 27, 2011

Rank: 1.9 / 5 (9)
You believe that the current assessment of the composition of the sun to be false. This is what i go by wouldnt a different iron composition be conflicting with the current solar mass unit.


No. The distribution of mass in the Sun is probably much like the distribution of mass in an atom of hydrogen.

The average density of the hydrogen atom in ~0.1 g/cm^3. The density of the nucleus is ~1,000,000,000,000,000 g/cm^3

If you doubt the variable Sun's dominant influence on Earth's constantly changing climate, you may want to read "Super-fluidity in the solar interior: Implications for solar eruptions and climate" [ Journal of Fusion Energy 21, 193-198 (2002)].

http://arxiv.org/.../0501441
omatumr
May 27, 2011

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
This short video on neutron repulsion may also help:

www.youtube.com/w...yLYSiPO0
that_guy
May 28, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (5)
I'm not concerned about neutron repulsion. You're not the first one to discover that they don't always stick together.

What I'm concerned about is that in our particle colliders and our fission bombs and fission assisted fusion bombs, we have very reliable data...fact about nuclear binding energies, energy released by fission and fusion, and energy cost to make a neutron, or to fuse an element higher than iron.

So I'm assuming for a moment that everything you say about the neutron is correct (I don't believe that, but for this argument we will agree)

You also say that the sun has a neutron core that powers it, and that all the elements are in stratified layers from hydrogen all the way down to uranium and whatever else to neutronium at the center.

But the fusion of elements past iron are endothermic, and will happen with much greater frequency than electron capture.

Therefore you will have a thick layer of dense collapsing material...
Continued
that_guy
May 28, 2011

Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
This collapsing material in between two layers with nominally positive static pressure is extremely unstable dynamically. At best this would cause churn (Mixing) that would make a lot of different elements/materials spectrally visible. We would see strong absorbtion lines in the sun's light for many elements. They could not stratify. This is assuming that it doesn't cause the star to go nova.

In addition, we do know experimentally, and have for a while, the energy difference required for a neutron to be made through various methods such as electron capture, why free neutrons don't stick together without protons, and all the energies involved in standard atomic physics that you describe. This is 1950s territory nuclear physics.

I don't doubt that you measured what you measured, but you didn't consult other scientists for ramifications in their fields - you jumped into those fields with no knowledge. Your theories are ridiculous.
omatumr
May 28, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (9)
This is 1950s territory nuclear physics.

I don't doubt that you measured what you measured, but you didn't consult other scientists for ramifications in their fields - you jumped into those fields with no knowledge. Your theories are ridiculous.


Professor Paul K. Kuroda was my advisor for a PhD in nuclear chemistry.

www.omatumr.com/a...aphy.pdf

I had a NSF Postdoctoral Fellowship for additional research with Professor John H. Reynolds.

www.omatumr.com/P...desc.htm

I received a Fulbright award for advanced astrophysics study at the Tata Institute for Fundamental Research

www.tifr.res.in/~daa/

I have published >100 peer-reviewed scientific papers.

Some of my co-authors have published >300 peer-reviewed scientific papers.

What are the qualifications of that_guy?
jscroft
Jun 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
...who has the most to lose by climate change and the most to gain by discrediting it Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil Exxon Mobil!!!


But Exxon Mobil is an ENERGY company. If "alternative" sources really DID represent the next wave, why would they not get in on the ground floor and COOPT these new technologies? Did they get to be a half-trillion-dollar enterprise by stupidly opposing great new ideas?
jscroft
Jun 01, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
What are the qualifications of that_guy?


Who cares? A solid argument NEEDS no pedigree. Why don't you address his?
jsdarkdestruction
Jul 23, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Oliver, stop your nonsense and give it up. You are having a hard time accepting your life has been a waste for the most part. It's hard to stop living a lie after a long time of living it(as you should know- you did molest your children for years while keeping it hidden and living the lie of being an honorable/respectable person)
Rank 4.6 /5 (14 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • revamping general concept and cosmological principle
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
    createdMay 25, 2012
  • Math behind Theoretical Physics
    createdMay 24, 2012
  • Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
    createdMay 23, 2012
  • Structure of the Milky Way?
    createdMay 20, 2012
  • What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
    createdMay 19, 2012
  • More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy

More news stories

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 22 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (20) | comments 2

Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision

Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 22 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 22 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 2

Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship

(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 22 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (6) | comments 0

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51


Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.