New study argues against conclusion that bacteria consumed Deepwater Horizon methane

May 26, 2011

A technical comment published in the current (May 27) edition of the journal Science casts doubt on a widely publicized study that concluded that a bacterial bloom in the Gulf of Mexico consumed the methane discharged from the Deepwater Horizon well.

The debate has implications for the ecosystem as well as for predictions of the effect of global warming, said marine scientist and lead author Samantha Joye, University of Georgia Athletic Association Professor in Arts and Sciences.

Based on methane and oxygen distributions measured at 207 stations in the Gulf of Mexico, a study published in the January 21, 2011 edition of Science concluded that "nearly all" of the methane released from the well was consumed in the within approximately 120 days of the release. In the current paper in Science, Joye and co-authors from 12 other institutions make the case that uncertainties in the discharge from the blowout, fueled by processes other than methane consumption, a problematic interpretation of and shortcomings of the model used by the authors of the January study challenge the attribution of low oxygen zones to the of .

"Our goal is to understand what happened to the methane released from the Macondo discharge and in the larger framework, to better understand the factors that regulate microbial methane consumption following large-scale gas releases," said Joye, a professor in the UGA Franklin College of Arts and Sciences. "I believe there is still a lot to learn about the that regulate methane consumption in the Gulf's waters and elsewhere."

Joye and her co-authors note that low levels of oxygen are known to occur in the Gulf of Mexico because of bacterial consumption of carbon inputs from the as well as the bacterial consumption of hydrocarbons that naturally seep from the seafloor. The researchers point out that given the uncertainty in oxygen and methane budgets, strong supporting evidence is required to attribute oxygen depletion to methane removal; however, a study published in the October 8, 2010 edition of Science showed low measured rates of methane consumption by bacteria. Joye and her co-authors note that samples from the control stations and the low-oxygen stations that were analyzed for unique genetic markers in the January 2011 study showed no significant difference in the abundance of methane consuming bacteria. Joye and her colleagues also argue that the model the study used neglected important factors that affect the transport and biodegradation of methane, and that it only provided a tentative match of the observational data.

Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, and understanding the fate of the methane released from the Deepwater Horizon well has implications for the entire planet, since global warming is likely to accelerate the release of methane that is currently trapped in hydrates on the seafloor. Based on the conclusion that bacteria had rapidly consumed the methane released from the Deepwater Horizon well, the January 2011 Science paper suggested that methane released from the oceans may not be likely to amplify an already warming climate.

Joye and her colleagues note that several other studies have found that considerable amounts of methane released from natural deep-sea vents are not consumed by microbes. The most vulnerable store of methane hydrates is not in the Gulf of Mexico, they also point out, but in the deposits that underlie the shallow waters of the Arctic.

"A range of data exists that shows a significant release of methane seeping out at the to the atmosphere, indicating that the microbial biofilter is not as effective," Joye said. "Importantly for the future of the planet, there is even less evidence for a strong biofilter of methane hydrate destabilized in the shallow Arctic settings."

Explore further: Jeju Island is a live volcano, study reveals

Related Stories

Just How Significant Is Methane On Titan?

Sep 12, 2005

Titan's second most abundant constituent, methane, is critical to the maintenance of an earth-like nitrogen atmosphere on this satellite. Without methane, Titan's nitrogen would condense, leaving behind a puny amount in ...

Measuring methane

Mar 01, 2011

Methane is an extremely potent greenhouse gas. Wetlands, gas hydrates, permafrost, termites, oceans, freshwater bodies, non-wetland soils, are all natural sources of atmospheric methane; however, the majority of methane presence ...

Recommended for you

Jeju Island is a live volcano, study reveals

15 hours ago

In Jeju, a place emerging as a world-famous vacation spot with natural tourism resources, a recent study revealed a volcanic eruption occurred on the island. The Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral ...

Has Antarctic sea ice expansion been overestimated?

16 hours ago

New research suggests that Antarctic sea ice may not be expanding as fast as previously thought. A team of scientists say much of the increase measured for Southern Hemisphere sea ice could be due to a processing ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

3432682
2.6 / 5 (5) May 26, 2011
Yeah, the original study could have been wrong, finding the oil and methane were quickly consumed. Or it could have been right. I bet the missing oil and methane are to be found with the missing heat in the ocean depths, and with the missing humidity at altitude, and the missing snowless winters in England.
SemiNerd
4.2 / 5 (5) May 26, 2011
Yeah, the original study could have been wrong, finding the oil and methane were quickly consumed. Or it could have been right. I bet the missing oil and methane are to be found with the missing heat in the ocean depths, and with the missing humidity at altitude, and the missing snowless winters in England.

Did you intend your comment to make sense?

If so... you failed.
eachus
2.6 / 5 (5) May 26, 2011
"Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, and understanding the fate of the methane released from the Deepwater Horizon well has implications for the entire planet, since global warming is likely to accelerate the release of methane that is currently trapped in hydrates on the seafloor."

I hate it when religion gets in the way of science. Methane is not a potent greenhouse gas. It is more effective at trapping heat than CO2, but by the time it reaches an altitude where it will affect the climate most or all of it has been oxidized (into CO2). Counting methane as twice as effective a GHG as CO2 is generous, and there are good reasons for considering methane as a net source of atmospheric cooling before it turns into ordinary CO2.

Methane does turn into CO2, and we still need to worry about all sources of CO2. But methane is no more or less serious source of CO2 than burning coal. (On second thought, worry much more about the burning coal.)