US in new push to break China Internet firewall

May 11, 2011 by Shaun Tandon
People surf the Internet in Hefei in central China. US State Department officials have said they would give $19 million to efforts to evade Internet controls in China, Iran and other authoritarian states which block online access to politically sensitive material.

The United States plans to pump millions of dollars into new technology to break through Internet censorship overseas amid a heightened crackdown on dissent in China, officials have said.

State Department officials said they would give $19 million to efforts to evade Internet controls in , Iran and other authoritarian states which block online access to politically sensitive material.

Michael Posner, the assistant secretary of state in charge of human rights, said funding would support that acts as a "slingshot" -- identifying material that countries are censoring and throwing it back at them.

"We're responding with new tools. This is a cat-and-mouse game. We're trying to stay one step ahead of the cat," Posner said.

The announcement came shortly after the United States and China wrapped up wide-ranging annual talks in which Secretary of State showed exasperation at Beijing's intensifying clampdown on domestic critics.

China routinely blocks sites that present non-official viewpoints on topics such as Tibet's exiled leader the , the banned Falungong spiritual movement and the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown on pro-democracy protesters.

More recently, Chinese authorities blocked search results for "Hillary Clinton" after she gave a speech championing Internet freedom and for "Jasmine," an allusion to pro-democracy uprisings sweeping the Arab world.

"In effect, we're going to be redirecting information back in that governments have initially blocked," Posner said.

"This can be done through email or posting it on blogs or RSS feeds or websites that the government hasn't figured out how to block," he said.

The funding comes out of $30 million which the allocated in the current fiscal year for Internet freedom.

The failure until now to spend the money led lawmakers to accuse the State Department of kowtowing to China. A recent Senate committee report called for another government body to be put in charge of the funds.

Falungong supporters developed the so-called Global Consortium, a software to evade China's Internet firewall that was so effective that Iranians sought it out during 2009 protests against the clerical regime.

Posner said that the State Department would not identify the recipients of funding due partly to "reasons of security."

Another US official who requested anonymity said that the State Department received requests for funding totaling $180 million and that it chose which ones appeared most effective.

The funding grants still need the green light from Congress, but the official voiced hope that it would happen quickly.

Clothilde Le Coz, Washington director of the media rights group Reporters Without Borders, welcomed the news and its timing, saying that China is jailing 77 people due to their Internet activities.

"It is a good news to know that more netizens will certainly be helped in getting their word out," she said.

But she said that circumvention tools for the Internet were a "Band-Aid" as the larger issue was ensuring freedom of expression.

In a speech in February, Clinton called the Internet "the public space of the 21st century" and pledged US efforts to ensure that it develops in a way that allows freedom of expression and association.

However, she also criticized activist site WikiLeaks for publishing secret US cables. She accused WikiLeaks of "theft" and said the issue did not contradict the US commitment to an open Internet.

Explore further: Study shows role of media in sharing life events

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

US Internet censorship fight falling short: report

Feb 13, 2011

State Department efforts to combat Internet censorship in China and other countries have fallen short and funding for the drive should be shifted to another US agency, a Senate committee report says.

US did not seek WikiLeaks cutoff: Clinton

Feb 15, 2011

The United States did not pressure private companies to deny service to WikiLeaks following its release of secret US diplomatic cables, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Tuesday.

Clinton renews push for open Internet access

Feb 15, 2011

US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton renews her push Tuesday for the free and open use of the Internet, which protesters from Egypt to Iran have used to demand political freedoms.

LinkedIn says access blocked in parts of China

Feb 25, 2011

Career networking site LinkedIn said Friday its service had been blocked in parts of China, after the launch of an online campaign for Middle East-style rallies that has triggered official unease.

China blocking Twitter, websites: RSF

Jun 02, 2009

China blocked access to Twitter, Flickr and other websites Tuesday, two days ahead of the 20th anniversary of the Tiananmen Square crackdown, Reporters Without Borders (RSF) said, expressing "outrage" at the ...

Recommended for you

Scalping can raise ticket prices

12 hours ago

Scalping gets a bad rap. For years, artists and concert promoters have stigmatized ticket resale as a practice that unfairly hurts their own sales and forces fans to pay exorbitant prices for tickets to sold-out concerts. ...

Study shows role of media in sharing life events

Jul 24, 2014

To share is human. And the means to share personal news—good and bad—have exploded over the last decade, particularly social media and texting. But until now, all research about what is known as "social sharing," or the ...

User comments : 5

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

WarRoom
not rated yet May 11, 2011
Well, somehow I doubt that any of that 19 mil is going to help me get on to Facebook here in China or even stop the filtering of Google searches. If the US were really to go to war on the Great Firewall of China, the Chinese would probably pull the plug on the internet like Egypt did during the Jasmine Revolution.
LuckyBrandon
2 / 5 (4) May 11, 2011
This is a very stupid move. This could effectively be seen as a progression to a state of war. What right do we have to meddle in their country's affairs?
Its funny, we do something like this to promote a freedom that we never actually had (that being freedom of speech)....fools are those who think we actually have it. I dare you to go stand in front of the whitehouse and discuss overthrowing the government publicly. To jail you will go, as a terrorist no less. See ya in guantanemo :)
FTL4Life
3 / 5 (2) May 11, 2011
Its funny, we do something like this to promote a freedom that we never actually had (that being freedom of speech)....fools are those who think we actually have it.

The fact that you even posted this, and I got to read it in America proves you're wrong.
The Westboro case is a great example of the lengths of free speech we're allowed in America, don't be silly.
LuckyBrandon
1 / 5 (1) May 18, 2011
again, go try standing in front of the white house and discussing government overthrow...
or hell, go tell a cop "FU"...it is legally assault on a police officer, in fact, if you say something like that in public and are asked to stop and you don't, that too is considered assault against that individual...not free speech, sorry...

Definition of FREEDOM

1: the quality or state of being free: as a: the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice or action

coincidentally, the definition of law is the exact opposite of this...

freedom is speech is really just the "sticks and stones may break my bones" philosophy IMO .... you can say almost anything you want, yes, but if you act on much of it, you don't have that freedom...

BTW that is based on TX law...
LuckyBrandon
1 / 5 (1) May 27, 2011
as a followup to my earlier comment about this being potentially seen as progression to a state of war...did you notice that china has now established a cyber warfare team after this info became public??