Chameleon magnets: ability to switch magnets 'on' or 'off' could revolutionize computing

May 27, 2011

Chameleon magnets: ability to switch magnets 'on' or 'off' could revolutionize computing

Enlarge

Theoretical physicist Igor Zutic has been exploring ways to use magnets to revolutionize computing. A new article in Science may show that it is possible.

(PhysOrg.com) -- What causes a magnet to be a magnet, and how can we control a magnet's behavior? These are the questions that University at Buffalo researcher Igor Zutic, a theoretical physicist, has been exploring over many years.

He is one of many scientists who believe that magnets could revolutionize computing, forming the basis of high-capacity and low-energy memory, and data transfer devices.

Today, in a commentary in Science, Zutic and fellow UB physicist John Cerne, who studies magnetism experimentally, discuss an exciting advancement: A study by Japanese scientists showing that it is possible to turn a material's magnetism on and off.

A material's magnetism is determined by a property all possess: something called "spin." Electrons can have an "up" or "down" spin, and a material is when most of its electrons possess the same spin. Individual spins are akin to tiny bar magnets, which have north and south poles.

In the Japanese study, which also appears in the current issue of Science, a team led by researchers at Tohoku University added cobalt to , a nonmagnetic semiconductor, to create a new material that, like a chameleon, can transform from a paramagnet (a nonmagnetic material) to a (a ) at room temperature.

To achieve change, the researchers applied an to the material, exposing the material to extra electrons. As Zutic and Cerne explain in their commentary, these additional electrons -- called "carriers" -- are mobile and convey information between fixed cobalt ions that causes the spins of the cobalt electrons to align in one direction.

In an interview, Zutic calls the ability to switch a magnet "on" or "off" revolutionary. He explains the promise of magnet- or spin-based computing technology -- called "spintronics" -- by contrasting it with conventional electronics.

Modern, record and read data as a blueprint of ones and zeros that are represented, in circuits, by the presence or absence of electrons. Processing information requires moving electrons, which consumes energy and produces heat.

Spintronic gadgets, in contrast, store and process data by exploiting electrons' "up" and "down" spins, which can stand for the ones and zeros devices read. Future energy-saving improvements in data processing could include devices that process information by "flipping" spin instead of shuttling electrons around.

In their Science commentary, Zutic and Cerne write that chameleon magnets could "help us make more versatile transistors and bring us closer to the seamless integration of memory and logic by providing smart hardware that can be dynamically reprogrammed for optimal performance of a specific task."

"Large applied magnetic fields can enforce the spin alignment in semiconductor transistors," they write. "With chameleon magnets, such alignment would be tunable and would require no magnetic field and could revolutionize the role ferromagnets play in technology."

In an interview, Zutic says that applying an electric voltage to a semiconductor injected with cobalt or other magnetic impurities may be just one way of creating a chameleon magnet.

Applying heat or light to such a material could have a similar effect, freeing electrons that can then convey information about spin alignment between ions, he says.

The so-far elusive heat-based chameleon magnets were first proposed by Zutic in 2002. With his colleagues, Andre Petukhov of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, and Steven Erwin of the Naval Research Laboratory, he elucidated the behavior of such magnets in a 2007 paper.

The concept of nonmagnetic materials becoming magnetic as they heat up is counterintuitive, Zutic says. Scientists had long assumed that orderly, magnetic materials would lose their neat, spin alignments when heated -- just as orderly, crystalline ice melts into disorderly water as temperatures rise.

The carrier electrons, however, are the key. Because heating a material introduces additional carriers that can cause nearby electrons to adopt aligned spins, heating chameleon materials -- up to a certain temperature -- should actually cause them to become magnetic, Zutic explains.

Provided by University at Buffalo search and more info website

4.7 /5 (21 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

gunslingor1
May 27, 2011

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (7)
Sounds like an electromagnet made of an alloy to me. Are you saying magnitism is maintained after the current is removed? Still sounds like an alloy electromagnet to me.
Na_Reth
May 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
This is basicly about controlling the spin of the electrons.
Garfieldo
May 27, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
yet another "paper" in science written by a guy who explains what's in another paper of the same issue.... easy way to expand one's h-factor by taking partial credits for what has been done.. And it's working !!! it's actually this guy's picture that appears here, and not the pics from the japanese team who actually carried the original work out !!
Please PhysOrg, correct this and first cite the original work.
Just My humble opinion.
that_guy
May 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
Sounds like an electromagnet made of an alloy to me. Are you saying magnitism is maintained after the current is removed? Still sounds like an alloy electromagnet to me.


It is not an electromagnet in the traditional sense. It works similar to a transistor. You add electrons, and it becomes magnetic. It doesn't explain the drain mechanism, but it sounds like you would apply a positive voltage to drain them, and it will no longer be magnetic.

The reason why it isn't like an electromagnet is that it doesn't need a constant current to create a magnetic field.
KingDWS
May 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The reason why it isn't like an electromagnet is that it doesn't need a constant current to create a magnetic field.

Just sounds like they re-invented 70's era magnetic bubble memory and now are giving it a new twist.
sender
May 28, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Could utilizing non-blinking quantum dots to optically modulate such a mechanism yield waveguide compression and spatial light modulation at a faster frequency for data storage, recovery and/or relay?
Zak_Mc_Kee
May 28, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
i would bet it has something to do with marko rodin's coil design, and the true way electrons want to flow.
that_guy
May 28, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Could utilizing non-blinking quantum dots to optically modulate such a mechanism yield waveguide compression and spatial light modulation at a faster frequency for data storage, recovery and/or relay?

The only thing this comment has to do with the article in discussion is 'data storage'
ppnlppnl
May 29, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)

What I'm about to say will seem like nonsense...

Yeah, You really didn't say anything that rises to the level of nonsense.

Hey, I read the whole thing so I'm allowed to flame. Right?
Tachyon8491
May 30, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
What is conspicuously missing in this article are the relevant switching parameters which would show this technology to offer superior performance - what operational voltages cause 1/0 switching; what is the typical hysteresis curve per switching element here; can this technology e.g. switch as fast as SOS (silicon on Saffire which is already twenty years old?); what is the maximum operational frequency; explanation of remanence effects here? ; what are expected power levels per integration complexity? ; Much of this sounds like a backward step in technology unless such parameters are explicitly presented...
CSharpner
May 30, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Kev,

Now, AGAIN, for the unteenth time: If the universe is only 6000 years old, why is it that we see objects BILLIONS of light years old?

Poof! I just made Kev disappear.
CSharpner
May 31, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Kev,

Now, AGAIN, for the unteenth time: If the universe is only 6000 years old, why is it that we see objects BILLIONS of light years old?

Poof! I just made Kev disappear.

Sorry, I meant billions of light years "AWAY", not "OLD"... duh.
danman5000
May 31, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
a ball of water which has a circumference of 28000 miles and is floating in space, then forcefully presurise that ball and change the elements within it to create a planet just like earth.

Where did all this water come from in the first place?

What is the source of the force to pressurize the water, and why did it act so suddenly? Do you realize how much force would be necessary to transmute water into other things? Is that possible, even in principle?

I wish you stuck around for more than your standard drive-by single comment. These are very basic concerns about your theory, which should be easily answerable by you.
whoyagonacal
May 31, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
I wish you stuck around for more than your standard drive-by single comment. These are very basic concerns about your theory, which should be easily answerable by you.


Have you considered reporting @kvtrs for abuse? I think it would be fun to get him booted off the site so he can take his trolling elsewhere.
FrankHerbert
Jun 02, 2011

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Everyone reading this should report kevinrtrs' comment above.
Skultch
Jun 03, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
The effect will be a planet that has a decaying magnetic field as observed on earth at present.


Source? The only sources I can find are on creationist websites, who's claims are easily debunked with a simple google search. Specifically, the theory suffers from obsolete understanding of the source of the magnetic field.

We don't know enough about the makeup of the Earth's core, you say? Then you can't use anything about the magnetic field to support any theory.

Also, the usage of "decaying" and "at present" makes no sense.
aroc91
Jun 12, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
yet another "paper" in science written by a guy who explains what's in another paper of the same issue.... easy way to expand one's h-factor by taking partial credits for what has been done.. And it's working !!! it's actually this guy's picture that appears here, and not the pics from the japanese team who actually carried the original work out !!
Please PhysOrg, correct this and first cite the original work.
Just My humble opinion.


They're called reviews. Their purpose is to typically compare and contrast related work and simplify it to a certain extent in order to explain it better.
Rank 4.7 /5 (21 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • distribution of molecules throughout the atmosphere
    created2 hours ago
  • The Global Positioning System !
    created3 hours ago
  • A Question relating Power
    created4 hours ago
  • Writing a book so im learning about things, i have some general questions please read
    created6 hours ago
  • Question about induced E field.
    created7 hours ago
  • Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
    created7 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (16) | comments 42 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.2 / 5 (21) | comments 47 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 15 | with audio podcast

Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots

(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of “robots” as a laser ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2 | with audio podcast weblog

Sound increases the efficiency of boiling

Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...

Physics / Soft Matter

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 5 / 5 (2) | comments 2


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.