Chameleon magnets: ability to switch magnets 'on' or 'off' could revolutionize computing
Theoretical physicist Igor Zutic has been exploring ways to use magnets to revolutionize computing. A new article in Science may show that it is possible.
(PhysOrg.com) -- What causes a magnet to be a magnet, and how can we control a magnet's behavior? These are the questions that University at Buffalo researcher Igor Zutic, a theoretical physicist, has been exploring over many years.
He is one of many scientists who believe that magnets could revolutionize computing, forming the basis of high-capacity and low-energy memory, data storage and data transfer devices.
Today, in a commentary in Science, Zutic and fellow UB physicist John Cerne, who studies magnetism experimentally, discuss an exciting advancement: A study by Japanese scientists showing that it is possible to turn a material's magnetism on and off.
A material's magnetism is determined by a property all electrons possess: something called "spin." Electrons can have an "up" or "down" spin, and a material is magnetic when most of its electrons possess the same spin. Individual spins are akin to tiny bar magnets, which have north and south poles.
In the Japanese study, which also appears in the current issue of Science, a team led by researchers at Tohoku University added cobalt to titanium dioxide, a nonmagnetic semiconductor, to create a new material that, like a chameleon, can transform from a paramagnet (a nonmagnetic material) to a ferromagnet (a magnetic material) at room temperature.
To achieve change, the researchers applied an electric voltage to the material, exposing the material to extra electrons. As Zutic and Cerne explain in their commentary, these additional electrons -- called "carriers" -- are mobile and convey information between fixed cobalt ions that causes the spins of the cobalt electrons to align in one direction.
In an interview, Zutic calls the ability to switch a magnet "on" or "off" revolutionary. He explains the promise of magnet- or spin-based computing technology -- called "spintronics" -- by contrasting it with conventional electronics.
Modern, electronic gadgets record and read data as a blueprint of ones and zeros that are represented, in circuits, by the presence or absence of electrons. Processing information requires moving electrons, which consumes energy and produces heat.
Spintronic gadgets, in contrast, store and process data by exploiting electrons' "up" and "down" spins, which can stand for the ones and zeros devices read. Future energy-saving improvements in data processing could include devices that process information by "flipping" spin instead of shuttling electrons around.
In their Science commentary, Zutic and Cerne write that chameleon magnets could "help us make more versatile transistors and bring us closer to the seamless integration of memory and logic by providing smart hardware that can be dynamically reprogrammed for optimal performance of a specific task."
"Large applied magnetic fields can enforce the spin alignment in semiconductor transistors," they write. "With chameleon magnets, such alignment would be tunable and would require no magnetic field and could revolutionize the role ferromagnets play in technology."
In an interview, Zutic says that applying an electric voltage to a semiconductor injected with cobalt or other magnetic impurities may be just one way of creating a chameleon magnet.
Applying heat or light to such a material could have a similar effect, freeing electrons that can then convey information about spin alignment between ions, he says.
The so-far elusive heat-based chameleon magnets were first proposed by Zutic in 2002. With his colleagues, Andre Petukhov of the South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, and Steven Erwin of the Naval Research Laboratory, he elucidated the behavior of such magnets in a 2007 paper.
The concept of nonmagnetic materials becoming magnetic as they heat up is counterintuitive, Zutic says. Scientists had long assumed that orderly, magnetic materials would lose their neat, spin alignments when heated -- just as orderly, crystalline ice melts into disorderly water as temperatures rise.
The carrier electrons, however, are the key. Because heating a material introduces additional carriers that can cause nearby electrons to adopt aligned spins, heating chameleon materials -- up to a certain temperature -- should actually cause them to become magnetic, Zutic explains.
Provided by
University at Buffalo
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
distribution of molecules throughout the atmosphere
2 hours ago
-
The Global Positioning System !
3 hours ago
-
A Question relating Power
4 hours ago
-
Writing a book so im learning about things, i have some general questions please read
6 hours ago
-
Question about induced E field.
7 hours ago
-
Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
7 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (21) |
47
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hawaii lab turns laser-powered bubbles into microrobots
(Phys.org) -- A team of scientists from the University of Hawaii are working on microrobots created from bubbles of air in a saline solution. The bubbles take on their title of robots as a laser ...
Sound increases the efficiency of boiling
Scientists at the Georgia Institute of Technology achieved a 17-percent increase in boiling efficiency by using an acoustic field to enhance heat transfer. The acoustic field does this by efficiently removing vapor bubbles ...
May 24, 2012 |
5 / 5 (2) |
2
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
May 27, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (7)
May 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 27, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (6)
Please PhysOrg, correct this and first cite the original work.
Just My humble opinion.
May 27, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (6)
It is not an electromagnet in the traditional sense. It works similar to a transistor. You add electrons, and it becomes magnetic. It doesn't explain the drain mechanism, but it sounds like you would apply a positive voltage to drain them, and it will no longer be magnetic.
The reason why it isn't like an electromagnet is that it doesn't need a constant current to create a magnetic field.
May 27, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Just sounds like they re-invented 70's era magnetic bubble memory and now are giving it a new twist.
May 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 28, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 28, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
The only thing this comment has to do with the article in discussion is 'data storage'
May 29, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
What I'm about to say will seem like nonsense...
Yeah, You really didn't say anything that rises to the level of nonsense.
Hey, I read the whole thing so I'm allowed to flame. Right?
May 30, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
May 30, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Now, AGAIN, for the unteenth time: If the universe is only 6000 years old, why is it that we see objects BILLIONS of light years old?
Poof! I just made Kev disappear.
May 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Sorry, I meant billions of light years "AWAY", not "OLD"... duh.
May 31, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Where did all this water come from in the first place?
What is the source of the force to pressurize the water, and why did it act so suddenly? Do you realize how much force would be necessary to transmute water into other things? Is that possible, even in principle?
I wish you stuck around for more than your standard drive-by single comment. These are very basic concerns about your theory, which should be easily answerable by you.
May 31, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Have you considered reporting @kvtrs for abuse? I think it would be fun to get him booted off the site so he can take his trolling elsewhere.
Jun 02, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Jun 03, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Source? The only sources I can find are on creationist websites, who's claims are easily debunked with a simple google search. Specifically, the theory suffers from obsolete understanding of the source of the magnetic field.
We don't know enough about the makeup of the Earth's core, you say? Then you can't use anything about the magnetic field to support any theory.
Also, the usage of "decaying" and "at present" makes no sense.
Jun 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
They're called reviews. Their purpose is to typically compare and contrast related work and simplify it to a certain extent in order to explain it better.