LED bulbs hit 100 watts as federal ban looms
May 16, 2011 By PETER SVENSSON , AP Technology Writer
In this product image provided by Osram Sylvania, an ULTRA High Performance Series omni-directional LED A-Line lamp, designed to give the equivalent brightness of a 75-watt standard bulb, is displayed.(AP Photo/Osram Sylvania)
Two leading makers of lighting products are showcasing LED bulbs that are bright enough to replace energy-guzzling 100-watt light bulbs set to disappear from stores in January.
Their demonstrations at the LightFair trade show in Philadelphia this week mean that brighter LED bulbs will likely go on sale next year, but after a government ban takes effect.
The new bulbs will also be expensive - about $50 each - so the development may not prevent consumers from hoarding traditional bulbs.
The technology in traditional "incandescent" bulbs is more than a century old. Such bulbs waste most of the electricity that feeds them, turning it into heat. The 100-watt bulb, in particular, produces so much heat that it's used in Hasbro's Easy-Bake Oven.
To encourage energy efficiency, Congress passed a law in 2007 mandating that bulbs producing 100 watts worth of light meet certain efficiency goals, starting in 2012. Conventional light bulbs don't meet those goals, so the law will prohibit making or importing them. The same rule will start apply to remaining bulbs 40 watts and above in 2014. Since January, California has already banned stores from restocking 100-watt incandescent bulbs.
Creating good alternatives to the light bulb has been more difficult than expected, especially for the very bright 100-watt bulbs. Part of the problem is that these new bulbs have to fit into lamps and ceiling fixtures designed for older technology.
Compact fluorescents are the most obvious replacement, but they have drawbacks. They contain a small amount of toxic mercury vapor, which is released if they break or are improperly thrown away. They last longer than traditional bulbs but not as long as LEDs. Brighter models are bulky and may not fit in existing fixtures.
Another new lighting technology, organic light-emitting diodes, or OLEDs, has had problems reaching mass production. OLEDs are glowing sheets or tiles, rather than pinprick light sources, as LEDs are. They're used as vibrant color screens for smartphones, particularly from Samsung Electronics Co.
But making OLEDs that are big, bright, cheap and long-lasting enough for use as light sources has proved difficult, in part because they use chemicals that are sensitive to oxygen and spoil unless sealed very carefully.
Acuity Brands Inc., an Atlanta-based maker of light fixtures, will be showing some OLED panels at the show. They will go on sale next year, but the price will likely make them technology showpieces rather than candidates for everyday lighting.
LEDs are efficient, durable and produced in great quantities, but they're still expensive. An LED bulb can contain a dozen light-emitting diodes, or tiny semiconductor chips, which cost about $1 each.
The big problem with LEDs is that although they don't produce as much heat as incandescent bulbs, the heat they do create shortens the lifespan and reduces the efficiency of the chips. Cramming a dozen chips together in a tight bulb-shaped package that fits in today's lamps and sockets makes the heat problem worse. The brighter the bulb, the bigger the problem is.
The most powerful pear-shaped LED bulbs in stores today - the kind that fits existing lamps - produce light equivalent to a 60-watt bulb, though there are more powerful ones for directional or flood lighting.
Osram Sylvania, a unit of Germany's Siemens AG, said it has overcome the heat problem and will be showing a pear-shaped 100-watt-equivalent LED bulb this week. It doesn't have a firm launch date, but it usually shows products about a year before they hit store shelves.
Lighting Sciences Group Corp., a Satellite Beach, Fla.-based company that specializes in LED lighting, will be showing several 100-watt-equivalent prototypes, including some that solve the problem of cooling the LEDs by using microscopic devices that move air over the chips, like miniature fans.
Before the 100-watters, there will be 75-watters on the shelves this year. Osram Sylvania will be selling them at Lowe's starting in July. Royal Philips Electronics NV, the world's biggest lighting maker, will have them in stores late this year for $40 to $45.
However, 60-watt bulbs are the big prize, since they're the most common. There are 425 million incandescent light bulbs in the 60-watt range in use in the U.S. today, said Zia Eftekhar, the head of Philips' North American lighting division. The energy savings that could be realized by replacing them with 10-watt LED bulbs is staggering.
To stimulate LED development, the federal government has instituted a $10 million "L Prize" for an energy-efficient replacement for the 60-watt bulb. Philips is so far the only entrant in testing, and Eftekhar expects the company to win it soon. But Lighting Sciences Group plans its own entry, which it will demonstrate at the trade show.
Philips has been selling a 60-watt-equivalent bulb at Home Depot since December that's quite similar to the one submitted to the contest. But it's slightly dimmer, consumes 2 watts too much power and costs $40, whereas the L Prize target is $22. Sylvania sells a similar LED bulb at Lowe's, also for $40.
However, LED prices are coming down quickly. The DoE expects a 60-watt equivalent LED bulb to cost $10 by 2015, putting them within striking range of the price of a compact fluorescent bulb.
Bob Karlicek, the director of the Smart Lighting Research Center at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in Troy, N.Y., thinks that price is achievable.
But, he said, "it's not necessarily clear to people in the lighting industry that LED chips were ever meant to go into a bulb."
What's really needed, he said, is a new approach to lighting - new fixtures and lamps that spread out the LEDs, avoiding the heat problem.
©2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update),
2 comments
-
Need a rigid insulation material???
9 hours ago
-
magnets or EMF in car bumpers to protect from fender bender
May 26, 2012
-
length of wire in a coil of known dimensions?
May 25, 2012
-
India Engineering Powerhouse
May 25, 2012
-
electromagnet core dereference between hard and soft iron
May 25, 2012
-
Measuring water pressure in an open tank
May 24, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Engineering
More news stories
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
2 hours ago |
5 / 5 (1) |
2
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Probability of contamination from severe nuclear reactor accidents is higher than expected: study
Catastrophic nuclear accidents such as the core meltdowns in Chernobyl and Fukushima are more likely to happen than previously assumed. Based on the operating hours of all civil nuclear reactors and the number ...
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
3.6 / 5 (21) |
56
|
HyperSolar shows dirty water no barrier to power world
(Phys.org) -- The Santa Barbara, California, company, HyperSolar, is set to transparently share the ups and downs of its research experiences toward the companys ultimate vision, successfully producing ...
Tesla to launch electric sedan in US on June 22
Tesla Motors said Tuesday it would begin deliveries of "the world's first premium electric sedan" on June 22, slightly ahead of schedule.
Technology / Energy & Green Tech
May 22, 2012 |
4.5 / 5 (11) |
18
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
May 16, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
May 16, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (5)
May 16, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (5)
sometimes, simpel rules work well, like all cars must have seatbelts.
May 16, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
I don't believe you.
May 16, 2011
Rank: 1.9 / 5 (14)
May 16, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
May 16, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (3)
Try reading the article...
May 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
Just a reminder, if light bulbs didn't give off radiation then they wouldn't be useful light bulbs.
May 16, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
I prefer 6500k cfls, but my wife thinks they are too bright and prefers the 2700K or incandescent.
From what I have seen of 'white' LEDs, I don't care for their color.
Maybe some clever folks could combine colored lasers to produce white light.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
May 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Cant see why not. I even apply thinned out paint over the bulbs i use for my art station to give a better colour light.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
No, they don't. LEDs produce more or less monochromatic light.
No, you can't, because of the reason stated above. For example, a "white" LED that outputs blue and yellow doesn't look red when you paint it red. It looks black.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Color temperature shouldn't be confused with brightness.
And generally speaking, using high color temperatures is suitable for brightly lit environments, whereas low color temperatures are better for dim lighting. It follows from the color response of the human eye, which experiences the Purkinje effect where you start to lose the sense of the color red when you get less light.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Not universally true - many TV's use LED backlights and have a good colour gamut. Much as they add yellow phosphor to downconvert from blue, they can add red phosphor, or a very broad yellow, to achieve almost any CRI (colour rendering index) desired. The lumens/watt goes down though. There are other alternatives like sprinkling a few HE Red LED dice in there.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
"Of the 204 new Obamacare waivers President Barack Obamas administration approved in April, 38 are for fancy eateries, hip nightclubs and decadent hotels in House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosis Northern California district.
Read more: http://dailycalle...McD2jbl9
Color temperature relates to brightness as a function of the human photopic response. Humans are most sensitive to 555 nm and the peak color temperature is 5000-6000K. 3000k peaks around 800nm, NIR. Higher peak temperatures provide the most broads spectrum of light.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
May 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
May 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (8)
May 17, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Well that isn't about to happen very fast in existing homes and offices and the manufacturing, shipping and fitting of all the replacement fittings and lamps is going to have an environmental impact of it's own. Making it work with what we already have is the best solution for some time to come, decades probably.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
I would think that "waste" heat in an oven is not actually wasted. I've never heard of any plan to ban incandescent lamps in that application... it would be pointless. However in a fridge...
May 17, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (1)
Not possible. LEDs don't emit broad spectrum light so a color "filter" won't work. Even if it did, it would lower efficiency.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
TV is not a good example since it is encoded RGB it doesn't require a continuous white spectrum backlight. Also, you can't "add" a color with a filter that isn't there. Bonkers' statement is correct since he was responding to a question about a colored filter, not fluorescence.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
J.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
May 17, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (2)
You use lighting when its dark, and that's mainly at night, whether it is summer or winter, hot or cold. With modern methods of home insulation, there is little need for additional heating beyond the heat produced via normal living in a properly insulated home. One spends money once for insulation, but every month forever for the energy to heat and cool a poorly insulated home.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (6)
If you look around, the most common flashlights, even Maglites, are now LED because they are bright and use less power.
When LEDs for the home meet that threshold, consumers will shift without being forced.
But, most people don't like being forced to do anything and this will continue to increase the members to the various tea parties around the USA.
Another unintended consequence of the Regulatory State.
May 17, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
May 21, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Televisions and their color gamut are entirely different issue from general lighting.
Here's for example, the spectrum of "white" from an LCD:
http://www.chemis...trum.jpg
It's not continuous, because that's not the point of the RGB color system. You want the colors to be monochromatic so you can design the color filters to be as selective as possible without losing parts of the backlight spectrum. That way you get pure colors.
Room lighting is the opposite. You want every kind of color in a continuous spectrum, because real objects work by subtracting color from the ambient light - not by adding color like the television panel does.
May 21, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Is that why color printers use CYM instead of RGB or RYB?
May 21, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
May 21, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
They can. How do you think they make white LEDs?? It's a blue led with a phosphor. It does affect the efficiency, though it's still tremendously more efficient than incandescent.
LEDs also produce relatively little light compared to a light bulb, so you will generally have a number of LEDs in a single bulb. Combining RGB LEDs, phosphors, and other techniques can give you a wide range range of color tones and depth.
They are also continually improving LEDs and looking for ways to make them cheaper, brighter, and more efficient - such as a natively white led.
That said, i think that selling a $50 LED lightbulb is absurd.
May 21, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That is the point of subtractive versus additive color.
RGB works as a light source to make the light itself appear a certain color, but the colors of the objects under that light depend on which wavelenghts they remove from the light.
And that process doesn't work properly if all visible wavelenghts are not present in the light. If there is no yellow, then a yellow object looks black.
May 21, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That's not a color filter.
May 21, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Some TV's have RGBY : )
May 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Commercially available LED bulbs have a power factor of +- 0.55.
Therefore the energy saving in real terms is nowhere near to what is advertised.
May 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
That depends on how you deal with the reactive power.
Sure, it does cause additional losses as the current required to deliver an amount of real power is higher when the power factor is off 1, but the common misconception is that the reactive power is lost in full.
May 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
For no practical purpose whatsoever, because the encoding is still RGB. It doesn't contain information about how much yellow there is in the picture, so the computer has to make a guess and produce something that probably wasn't in the picture in the first place.
May 22, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
SH's Regulatory State didn't ban incandescent light bulbs. It just imposed a physically impossible standard for them to meet.
But that is typical of SH's R.S., impose standards that violate the laws of nature.
May 22, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
They're inefficient.
There's nothing in the laws of nature preventing a more efficient incandescent light bulb. Perhaps you should spend a little time learning about light bulbs before you post silly shit trying to call me out. I'm starting to think the only reason you post here is for my attention. That's pretty sad.
May 22, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Buy truckload of quality incandescent light bulbs.
Result:
5:1 profit margin in one year.
'lightbulb millionaire'. Cool Beans.
May 23, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Your point?
Steam ships phased out because something better came along. CFLs and LEDs are not better, they're just compromizes of one thing over another.
Imagine having a government ban on steam engines in a time when diesel engines were still worse than steam engines in every other respect than efficiency.
May 25, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
I'm not sure what your disagreement with them is. Have you used them recently?
May 25, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
So far, the light spectrum from an LED is not preferred.
If I don't like the quality of the light and it costs 20 times more, why should I buy them? I guess that's why the govt has to force people to buy them.