Study: Biodegradable products may be bad for the environment

May 31, 2011

Research from North Carolina State University shows that so-called biodegradable products are likely doing more harm than good in landfills, because they are releasing a powerful greenhouse gas as they break down.

"Biodegradable materials, such as disposable cups and utensils, are broken down in landfills by microorganisms that then produce methane," says Dr. Morton Barlaz, co-author of a paper describing the research and professor and head of NC State's Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering. "Methane can be a valuable energy source when captured, but is a when released into the atmosphere."

And the U.S. (EPA) estimates that only about 35 percent of municipal solid waste goes to landfills that capture methane for energy use. EPA estimates that another 34 percent of landfills capture methane and burn it off on-site, while 31 percent allow the methane to escape.

"In other words," Barlaz says, "biodegradable products are not necessarily more environmentally friendly when disposed in landfills."

This problem may be exacerbated by the rate at which these man-made break down. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) guidelines call for products marked as "biodegradable" to decompose within "a reasonably short period of time" after disposal. But such rapid degradation may actually be environmentally harmful, because federal regulations do not require landfills that collect methane to install gas collection systems for at least two years after the waste is buried. If materials break down and release methane quickly, much of that methane will likely be emitted before the collection technology is installed. This means less potential fuel for energy use, and more .

As a result, the researchers find that a slower rate of is actually more environmentally friendly, because the bulk of the will occur after the methane collection system is in place. Some specific biodegradable products such as bags that hold yard waste and are always sent to composting or anaerobic digestion facilities were not included in the study.

"If we want to maximize the environmental benefit of biodegradable products in landfills," Barlaz says, "we need to both expand methane collection at and design these products to degrade more slowly – in contrast to FTC guidance."

More information: The paper, "Is Biodegradability a Desirable Attribute for Discarded Solid Waste? Perspectives from a National Landfill Greenhouse Gas Inventory Model," was co-authored by Barlaz and NC State Ph.D. student James Levis, and was published online May 27 by the journal Environmental Science & Technology.

Provided by North Carolina State University search and more info website

4.3 /5 (12 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

extremity
May 31, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
I'm not sure why this article got a 1/5 rating. It is simply informing us that based on this study, we may be handling biodegradable waste incorrectly. Although it does imply that when biodegradable objects are incorrectly disposed of, they may actually be counter productive to their cause. Which, frankly, is something that seems very important to know. There should be some follow-up and additional research by peers.
emsquared
May 31, 2011

Rank: 2.4 / 5 (5)
we may be handling biodegradable waste incorrectly.

I disagree. This demonstrates the myopic nature of the "Green" movement, which seems to only be able to focus on CO2 and GHGs.

Q: What is the biggest problem facing any given ecosystem?
A: Environmental quality degradation.

Q: What causes this degradation in quality?
A: Toxic pollutants (heavy metals, particulates, SO2, NOx, agri-run off, etc.), general mismanagement (i.e. spreading invasive species, over-fishing, unsustainable consumption of resource - like deforestation), habitat destruction (urban sprawl, farm-land, road proliferation, NON-DEGRADABLE WASTE-DISPOSAL, deforestation), and other by-products of a consumer driven society.

Q: What is not a threat to the environment?
A: A changing climate. Earth demonstrates this time and again. Nature has dealt with far more drastic changes in climate than what we are experiencing, yes, even more rapid, a changing climate is no danger to life on earth. The above things are.
Gilbert
May 31, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (4)
"This demonstrates the myopic nature of the "Green" movement, which seems to only be able to focus on CO2 and GHGs."

I believe that if you search further you will find that there are plenty of organisations focusing on more than just CO2 and GHGs

"Q: What causes this degradation in quality?"

perhaps in the answer to this you could also place "mis-handling of biodegradable waste"? .. as the article suggests
hush1
May 31, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Yes. The 'culpability' of any particular gas (or substance) is not an issue. As long as the 'solution' renders a 'pristine' environment...again.

I misplaced my biodegradable fuel rods again. Must be way to change that half life too.
astro_optics
May 31, 2011

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
This just proves all over again , that the green movement has no clue what they are doing... They developed these biodegradable products a few years ago, just to try to to ban them now! The same applies to anything else they come up with... annoying little buggers!
hush1
Jun 01, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
"They developed these biodegradable products a few years ago, just to try to to ban them now!"

I don't understand. Which biodegradables of a few years ago are the target of attempted bans now?
emsquared
Jun 01, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
there are plenty of organisations focusing on more than just CO2 and GHGs

Organizations, sure. And those groups prevent being labeled as an environmentalist from being meaningless or even insulting.

But the popular, modern Green Movement - which is not organized at all, what you primarily hear in the media, almost exclusively focus' on carbon. Oh, and organics. It's a glorified marketing scheme. No need to change how you live, change what you buy. That is the prevailing message these days, it misses the point.

perhaps in the answer to this you could also place "mis-handling of biodegradable waste"?

No, this article is implying that methane release is worse for the environment than loss of habitat (i.e. longer lasting garbage). It's just not true and it's a disgusting misrepresentation of the most DIRECT threats to the environment.

Also, to those who down-rank with no reply, wanna present a counterpoint or are you just an intellectual coward?
Gilbert
Jun 01, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
"This just proves all over again , that the green movement has no clue what they are doing... They developed these biodegradable products"

For one it would have been an entrepreneur or some company in the commercial sector that developed this technology. Just wanting to cash in on "the green movement"

"No, this article is implying that methane release is worse for the environment than loss of habitat"

Can you please point out to me where does the article compare methane to loss of habitat? I may need glasses but I can make out words on my screen and can't find loss of habitat anywhere?

I agree "the green movement" does mostly focus on Carbon, I am equally frustrated at that, I drive down from my house and see new areas of land being cleared everyday to make way for suburban sprawl and I find it unnerving. However I think you are defining "the green movement" in an incorrect manor. Was it not part of "the green movement" that was responsible for this artlicle? or any other research?
emsquared
Jun 02, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Can you please point out to me where does the article compare methane to loss of habitat?

The article is saying it would be better for the environment to have longer lasting garbage than quick-decaying garbage, because of it's methane release "schedule". They don't call out habitat-loss specifically but that would be the result of longer lasting garbage, they do state specifically as follows:
As a result, the researchers find that a slower rate of biodegradation is actually more environmentally friendly ... [than] "If materials break down and release methane quickly"
Rank 4.3 /5 (12 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts

More news stories

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 23 hours ago | popularity 4.5 / 5 (21) | comments 2

Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision

Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 23 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (4) | comments 2

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.

Space & Earth / Astronomy

created 23 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (3) | comments 2

Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship

(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.

Space & Earth / Space Exploration

created 23 hours ago | popularity 5 / 5 (6) | comments 0

Sophisticated simulations predict future warming

The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...

Space & Earth / Earth Sciences

created May 22, 2012 | popularity 4.4 / 5 (9) | comments 51


Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012

(Phys.org) -- Nvidia’s competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...

Browser wars flare in mobile space

The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.

Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.