AT&T's T-Mobile buy faces congressional scrutiny

May 11, 2011 by Chris Lefkow

US lawmakers grilled AT&T on Wednesday over its proposed $39 billion acquisition of rival T-Mobile USA, questioning whether the mega-merger would harm competition in the fast-growing wireless industry.

"At present four companies control nearly 90 percent of the national wireless market," said Senator Patrick Leahy, a Democrat from Vermont.

"This acquisition would further consolidate an already concentrated market for wireless communication," Leahy told a hearing of the Senate Judiciary Committee on Anti-trust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights.

"I expect the Department of Justice and the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to conduct an exhaustive and careful analysis of this acquisition and its impact on competition," he said.

"The analysis should include the impact the proposed transaction will have on consumer prices, choices for cellphone and wireless data plans and whether the acquisition will stifle or promote innovation."

Adding T-Mobile's subscribers would give AT&T around 40 percent of the market and make it the top US wireless carrier. Verizon is currently number one, followed by AT&T, Sprint Nextel and T-Mobile.

Sprint had also expressed interest in acquiring T-Mobile, the US unit of Germany's Deutsche Telekom, and Sprint chief executive Daniel Hesse spoke out strongly against the transaction at Wednesday's hearing.

"AT&T's acquisition of T-Mobile will turn back the clock on wireless competition," Hesse said, and would "put Ma Bell back together again."

"The wireless industry thrives on competition," Hesse said, and an AT&T acquisition of T-Mobile would mean that "two companies would largely control industry pricing."

"This merger is unfixable," he said. "The only remedy that can preserve competition is a vibrant wireless market and we ask you to 'just say no' to this takeover.

"We urge the Justice Department and the FCC to say no."

Senator Al Franken, a Democrat from Minnesota, also raised the specter of Ma Bell -- the AT&T-led telephone service broken up by the US government in the 1980s.

"I fear that this merger would take us just one step away from the monopoly market we had under Ma Bell," Franken said. "I believe it's going to raise prices for American families and cost thousands of jobs."

AT&T chairman and chief executive Randall Stephenson defended the purchase under tough questioning saying "this transaction is about consumers."

"It's about keeping up with consumer demand specifically," Stephenson said. "It's about having the capacity to drive innovation and competitive prices.

"And, most important, it's about giving consumers what they expect, and that's fewer dropped calls, faster speeds and access to high-speed fourth-generation mobile Internet service," he said.

Stephenson said it would also help relieve a wireless "spectrum crunch."

"To meet the ever increasing demand by consumers, we have to find ways to get more capacity from existing spectrum," he said. "That is exactly what the combination of AT&T and T-Mobile will do."

"The US wireless marketplace is the most competitive in the world and it will remain so after this transaction," Stephenson said.

T-Mobile US chief executive Philipp Humm also defended the deal saying Deutsche Telekom "is not in a position to finance the necessary large scale investments in the US for T-Mobile to remain competitive."

Computer and Communications Industry Association president and chief executive Ed Black called meanwhile for the deal to be blocked.

"When it comes to antitrust law, the case against the merger is a slam dunk," Black said in a statement.

"The problem with AT&T's service is they have decided what's best for profits is to not innovate and to complain of spectrum scarcity -- rather than invest in solutions."

Explore further: Scientists twist radio beams to send data: Transmissions reach speeds of 32 gigabits per second

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Sprint wants AT&T, T-Mobile deal blocked

Mar 28, 2011

Sprint Nextel, the third-largest US wireless provider, urged US regulators on Monday to block AT&T's $39 billion acquisition of T-Mobile USA, saying it would harm competition.

FCC adopts rules to drive wireless competition

Apr 07, 2011

(AP) -- Federal regulators adopted rules Thursday to drive more competition in wireless broadband as more people access the Internet using iPhones and other popular mobile devices.

Deal to combine AT&T, T-Mobile raises questions

Mar 22, 2011

(AP) -- AT&T's surprise announcement that it plans to acquire T-Mobile USA will force federal regulators to confront a difficult antitrust question: Can American consumers get good wireless service at a fair ...

T-Mobile USA posts record subscriber losses

May 06, 2011

(AP) -- T-Mobile USA lost a record number of subscribers in the first three months of the year, posing a conundrum for regulators as they look at whether to let AT&T Inc. buy the smaller carrier for $39 billion.

Recommended for you

Oculus unveils new prototype VR headset

Sep 20, 2014

Oculus has unveiled a new prototype of its virtual reality headset. However, the VR company still isn't ready to release a consumer edition.

Wireless sensor transmits tumor pressure

Sep 20, 2014

The interstitial pressure inside a tumor is often remarkably high compared to normal tissues and is thought to impede the delivery of chemotherapeutic agents as well as decrease the effectiveness of radiation ...

Tim Cook puts personal touch on iPhone 6 launch

Sep 20, 2014

Apple chief Tim Cook personally kicked off sales of the iPhone 6, joining in "selfies" and shaking hands with customers Friday outside the company's store near his Silicon Valley home.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Caliban
5 / 5 (1) May 11, 2011
Competitive my ass. Consolidation reduces competition, and leads to price fixing, collusion, and the defrauding of the public and government.

Here's a little more regarding the current state of affairs, if anyone is interested:

http://www.rawsto...um=email

Amazing how different the details look when they aren't being spun by an industry insider.