Activists warn G-8 against Web restrictions

May 25, 2011 By FRANK JORDANS , Associated Press
French President Nicolas Sarkozy, left, greets founder and Chief Executive Officer of Facebook Mark Zuckerberg at the Elysee Palace, in Paris, Wednesday, May 25, 2011. (AP Photo/Bob Edme)

(AP) -- Internet activists and digital entrepreneurs warned Wednesday that if global leaders attempt to limit access to the Web, their restrictions will be bypassed and they will become irrelevant.

The stark message adds to growing resistance - from big name companies like and Twitter to anonymous Internet vigilantes who have attacked government censorship networks - against creeping laws that might one day restrict services many users now take for granted.

Leaders of the Group of Eight most powerful countries begin meeting in France on Thursday to discuss issues of global concern in the wake of the Arab uprising that have been described as the first Internet-enabled revolutions.

"G-8 governments should say very clearly for once that Internet access is a fundamental human right," said Jean-Francois Julliard, who heads free speech group .

Julliard said more than 60 countries now have some form of in place, and that number is growing.

Tony Wang, Twitter's general manager for Europe, said attempts to crack down on free expression are self-defeating.

He declined to discuss attempts in Britain to enforce the country's strict privacy law against users of the micro-blogging site. But Wang told a panel in Paris that "the response to bad speech should be more speech."

Earlier this year, teamed up with Google to create a service allowing Egyptians to post messages on the Internet even after the government had cut Web access in an effort to quell street protests.

"We take that open communication channel for granted at our peril," Google's regional policy director Susan Pointer said.

Support for unrestricted Web access also came from the U.S. government. Alec Ross, a special adviser to U.S. Secretary of State , said Washington recently spent $28 million training to use tools that allow them to bypass online filters.

With users become more sophisticated and technology allowing them to establish autonomous networks outside of government control, some at the meeting said authorities are fighting a losing battle.

"Government in many ways is absolutely going to, if not already has, become irrelevant," said Shervin Pishevar, the chief executive of California-based SGN, which invests in social and mobile gaming companies. "It's not going to be in control anymore with the technologies that are coming down the pipe."

That message may not be welcomed by all G-8 leaders. Their host, French President Nicolas Sarkozy, had convened Internet mavens in Paris on Tuesday to argue that the online world needs more real-world regulation.

Maurice Levy, tasked by Sarkozy with organizing what was billed as the first "e-G-8" conference, said participants hoped leaders would heed their objection to greater government interference.

"If it just changes (views) by two degrees it will be a huge victory," said Levy, the chief executive of France's ad agency Publicis Groupe SA.

Asked what she would tell the G-8, activist Nadine Wahab said the lesson from the successful uprisings in Egypt and Tunisia should be: "Leave the Internet alone."

"It doesn't belong either to companies, nor the governments nor the G-8," she said.

Explore further: Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

5 /5 (1 vote)
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Sarkozy: Gov'ts must regulate the Internet

May 24, 2011

(AP) -- French President Nicolas Sarkozy said Tuesday that governments need to lay down and enforce rules in the digital world - even as they need to foster creativity and economic growth with the Internet.

Key Internet summit to discuss online rules

May 24, 2011

The world's most powerful Internet and media barons gathered in Paris on Tuesday in a show of strength to leaders at the G8 summit, amid rows over online copyright, regulation and human rights.

Internet bosses woo world leaders at 'e-G8'

May 23, 2011

The world's most powerful Internet and media barons gather in Paris on Tuesday in a show of strength to leaders at the G8 summit, amid international rows over online access, copyright and regulation.

US did not seek WikiLeaks cutoff: Clinton

Feb 15, 2011

The United States did not pressure private companies to deny service to WikiLeaks following its release of secret US diplomatic cables, US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Tuesday.

Recommended for you

Ebola.com domain sold for big payout

12 hours ago

The owners of the website Ebola.com have scored a big payday with the outbreak of the epidemic, selling the domain for more than $200,000 in cash and stock.

Facebook goes retro with 'Rooms' chat app

Oct 23, 2014

Facebook on Thursday released an application that lets people create virtual "rooms" to chat about whatever they wish using any name they would like.

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

daniel_ikslawok
1 / 5 (2) May 27, 2011
The crazy thing is some people really think the Internet should be a law-free zone... what about child pornography, identity theft, credit card theft, to name just a few. Of course we need laws like in our real world. The Internet is only a new medium for art, information, many others as well as crime. If you don't want to be protected, post your credit card details in the next comment :)
AngryMoose
3 / 5 (2) May 27, 2011
Real world laws already cover your online activities, downloading a movie is exactly the same as taking one from a shop. If laws and measures are setup to monitor internet activity in such a way that we couldn't get away with downloading that movie, why not accept that everyone should wear a networked camera hat to prevent theft in the physical world?

We have a vast communication network capable of making democracy a true reality one day. If I was being paid a fortune to represent democracy for people, I would be worried too.
daniel_ikslawok
1 / 5 (1) May 27, 2011
why not accept that everyone should wear a networked camera hat to prevent theft in the physical world?


That argument is just ridiculous. If you would earn your money by making movies or recording music, I think you would be equally angry at people stealing it online or selling physical copies.

We have a vast communication network capable of making democracy a true reality one day. If I was being paid a fortune to represent democracy for people, I would be worried too.


I'm not saying all the things governments plan to govern the Internet are perfect, neither are their laws in the real world. But thinking a place without laws could work neglects all organisations, companies, interest groups and so on which could easily go out of control. By the way, those companies could also easily restrict and govern the Internet. Don't think that just because of the absence of governments everything will be perfect and flawless.