New data from XENON100 narrows the possible range for dark matter

April 14, 2011

New data from XENON100 narrows the possible range for dark matter

Enlarge

1) The surface of the Earth is constantly bombarded by cosmic radiation. Only the most energetic particles penetrate the rock, so detectors aiming to "see" the rare signal from cosmic Dark Matter are placed beneath the Earth. 2) Dark Matter in the form of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles (WIMPs) can traverse the Earth without interacting with it to reach XENON100, a detector filled with liquid xenon that is designed to be sensitive to such rare encounters. 3) A WIMP interaction in the liquid xenon will excite atoms and free electrons, which will be picked up again swiftly by the atoms. Both processes produce a flash of light that can be detected by photomultipliers, which act as extremely sensitive cameras, at each end of the tank. 4) An electric field running through the detector prevents some of the electrons from recombining with the xenon atoms. These free electrons are pushed upwards towards the anode, an electrode through which electric current flows, until they reach the liquid-to-gas interface. 5) At the interface, a stronger electric field pulls the electrons out of the liquid into the gas, where they create another flash of light that is detected by the same photomultipliers. The brightness of this second flash compared with the first one reveals the type of particle that caused the signal.Credit: Zina Deretsky, National Science Foundation

(PhysOrg.com) -- An International team of scientists in the XENON collaboration, including several from the Weizmann Institute, announced on Thursday the results of their search for the elusive component of our universe known as dark matter. This search was conducted with greater sensitivity than ever before. After one hundred days of data collection in the XENON100 experiment, carried out deep underground at the Gran Sasso National Laboratory of the INFN, in Italy, they found no evidence for the existence of Weakly Interacting Massive Particles – or WIMPs – the leading candidates for the mysterious dark matter. The three candidate events they observed were consistent with two they expected to see from background radiation. These new results reveal the highest sensitivity reported as yet by any dark matter experiment, while placing the strongest constraints on new physics models for particles of dark matter. Weizmann Institute professors Eilam Gross, Ehud Duchovni and Amos Breskin, and the research student Ofer Vitells, made significant contributions to the findings by introducing a new statistical method that both increases the search sensitivity and enables new discovery.

Any direct observation of WIMP activity would link the largest observed structures in the with the world of subatomic particle physics. While such detection cannot be claimed as yet, the level of sensitivity achieved by the XENON100 experiment could be high enough to allow an actual detection in the near future. What sets XENON100 apart from competing experiments is its significantly lower background radiation The XENON100 detector, which uses 62 kg of as its WIMP target, and which measures tiny charges and light signals produced by predicted rare collisions between WIMPs and xenon atoms, continues its search for WIMPs. New data from the 2011 run, as well as the plan to build a much larger experiment in the coming years, promise an exciting decade in the search for the solution to one of nature's most fundamental mysteries.


Dark matter has so far foiled most means of detection, but researchers are continuing to pursue its mysteries. They're using the most sensitive detector yet, called Xenon100, to try to glimpse the particles. See how it works in this video. Credit: National Science Foundation

Cosmological observations consistently point to a picture of our universe in which the ordinary matter we know makes up only 17% of all matter; the rest – 83% – is in an as yet unobserved form – so-called dark matter. This complies with predictions of the smallest scales; necessary extensions of the Standard Model of particle physics suggest that exotic new particles exist, and these are perfect dark matter candidates. Weakly Interacting (WIMPs) are thus implied in both cosmology and particle physics. An additional hint for their existence lies in the fact that the calculated abundance of such particles arising from the Big Bang matches the required amount of dark matter. The search for WIMPs is thus well-founded; a direct detection of such particles would provide the central missing piece needed to confirm this new picture of our Universe.

The properties of dark matter have been addressed through a variety of approaches and methods; these have provided the scientists with indirect hints of what to search for. WIMPs are expected to have a mass comparable to that of atomic nuclei, with a very low probability of interacting with normal matter. Such particles are thought be distributed in an enormous cloud surrounding the visible disk of the Milky Way. Earth is moving through this cloud, along with the Sun, on its journey around the Galaxy center. This movement results in a 'WIMP wind,' which may occasionally scatter off atomic nuclei in an Earth-bound detector, releasing a tiny amount of energy, which can then be detected with ultra- sensitive devices.

In the XENON100 experiment, 62 kg of liquid xenon acts as a WIMP target. The liquid, at a temperature of about -90° C, is contained in a stainless steel cryostat equipped with a cryo-cooler to maintain highly stable operating conditions. The experiment is located in the Gran Sasso Underground Laboratory (LNGS) in Italy where it is shielded from cosmic radiation by 1400 meters of rock. Further shielding from radioactivity in the detector itself and its surroundings is provided by layers of active and passive absorbers surrounding the target. These include 100 kg of active liquid xenon scintillator, 2 tons of ultra-pure copper, 1.6 tons of polyethylene and 34 tons of lead and water. The radio-pure materials used to produce the detector components assure an ultra-low background radiation environment.

Particles interacting within the active liquid xenon space excite and ionize atoms. This results in light emission in the deep ultraviolet. As electrons drift across the liquid xenon, they create a delayed, luminescent signal on the top of the detector, due to the experiment's strong electric field. Both primary and secondary scintillation light signals are detected via two arrays of photosensors – one located in the liquid xenon at the bottom, and one in the gas above the liquid (Figure 1). The simultaneous measurement of these two light signals enables the researchers to infer both the energy and the spatial coordinates of the particles' interaction, while providing information on their nature. This analysis of ratio of the two light signals and their precise localization in space is an extremely accurate method of distinguishing WIMP signals from background events.

Many of technologies and methods used in the XENON100 experiment have been built on the research and development efforts of the XENON Dark Matter Search program, which produced, in 2006, the XENON10 prototype. For XENON100, a ten-fold increase in fiducial target mass, combined with 100-fold reduction in background, translates into a substantial improvement in sensitivity to WIMP-nucleon elastic scattering. An extensive calibration using various sources of gammas and neutrons was performed to demonstrate that XENON100 reached its goals for sensitivity and for low background radiation.

Results from a preliminary analysis from11.2 days worth of data, taken during the experiment's commissioning phase in October and November 2009, have already set new upper limits on the interaction rate of WIMPs – the world's best for WIMP masses below about 80 times the mass of a proton ( Physical Review Letters 105 (2010) 131302).

A new dark matter search was performed between January and June, 2010, and 100 days worth of data from this run have been analyzed. Three candidate events were found within the pre-defined parameters in which the WIMP signal is expected to appear. However, these events, while coming from true particle interactions in the detector, are consistent with predictions of two such events resulting from radioactive backgrounds. Thus evidence for dark matter cannot be claimed, but a new upper limit for the strength of its interaction with normal matter could be calculated. These results represent the best limits to date. They narrow the possibilities open to supersymmetric particle physics theories that predict the nature of dark matter.

XENON100 has achieved the lowest background among all dark matter experiments worldwide (Physical Review D (2011), arXiv:1101.3866). Since the data presented here were collected, the intrinsic background from radioactive krypton in the xenon filling XENON100 has been reduced to an unprecedented low level and the detectors' performance has been improved as well. Even as new data are being collected in these improved conditions, the scientific team is preparing a next-generation search experiment featuring a detector that will contain more than 1000 kg of liquid as a fiducial WIMP target. With further reduction in overall background radiation, XENON1T promises to be a hundred times more sensitive than XENON100.

Provided by Weizmann Institute of Science search and more info website

4.5 /5 (11 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (14)
"We found absolutely NOTHING! Send ten times more money please!"
pbfred
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.4 / 5 (13)
Dark matter is like Count Dracula. It will take more than a few nails in the coffin to put this 70 year-old, reflexive, neo-aether notion to rest. Fortunately, there are now three studies linking the temperature of a test mass to its weight. These studies open up the never-thought-of but almost-obvious possibility that luminosity is the source of gravitational attraction. Luminosity is ubiquitous. It emanates from all gravitationally bound bodies in the universe.

http://arxiv.org/abs/0803.1730
http://vixra.org/abs/0907.0018
http://www.screen...c7c8f5e1
ZephirAWT
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
Actually, many physicists, when facing some new phenomena are attributing it to new particles. So far I met with probable composition of dark matter by mainstream peer-reviewed theories ordered by their average rest mass: scalar field, quintessence, mirror matter, axions, inflatons, heavy photons, fat strings, sterile neutrinos, chameleon particles, dark fluid and dark baryons, fotinos, gravitinos and WIMPs, SIMPs, MACHOs, RAMBOs, DAEMONs and micro-black holes. Nearly every physicist dealing with dark matter is promoting his "own" particles into account of another ones.

The existence of dark matter doesn't imply, it must be composed of some special, dedicated particles (after all, in the same way, like the Higgs field attributed to mass of Z-bosons). Bellow is the picture of water ripples, which are slowing their spreading around source, like if it would be surrounded with some invisible particles.

http://people.rit...4565.jpg
ZephirAWT
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
The existence of dark mater follows from relativity, when the mass/energy equivalence is introduced into it. Einstein's theory of gravity is actually more complex, than it appears. In general it says, the mass is curving the space, thus introducing the energy of curved space-time around it. This is where the contemporary formal math has stuck (actually, even this simple thing is difficult to express in tensor math).

But in Einstein's theory every energy has its mass assigned by E=mc^2 formula. This formula says, the energy of curved space-time is behaving like sparse matter, distributed around massive objects with space-time curved. Such additional mass will be therefore the source of another gravity, which acts from "outside" of massive bodies and it compensates their own gravity field a bit. This concept is apparently recursive, because even the curvature of the space caused with this additional gravity field would have its own mass and it leads into dark matter field around objects
Nik_2213
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Could it be that the Local Bubble we're currently passing through is bereft of the stuff ?? http://en.wikiped...l_Bubble
TimESimmons
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
They're still looking in the wrong place

http://www.presto...ndex.htm
gstillwell
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 3.2 / 5 (5)
No surprise there!

ZephirAWT:
Good thinking out of the box; however, we call what you are referring to...the energy of the curvature of space as gravity or gravitative attraction.

I think I see where you are going with this but it needs some refining i.e. curvature energy is how the mass expresses its attraction; and if there were more mass attributed to curved space due to its curvature energy, besides the mass curving the space itself, we would most likely observer it especially for a local body like the Sun or moon but I like your thinking.

ZephirAWT
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.9 / 5 (7)
we would most likely observer it especially for a local body
Dark matter is hyperdimensional effect, it's observable only from sufficient distance of massive body - whereas from proximity only the relativistic aberration can be seen. But massive objects are more affected with dark matter, than the light - which is the reason, why we can observe the Pioneer anomaly, Alais effect and many other subtle anomalies of space-probes flying around Earth and Saturn. And I'm not thinking out of box - the above approach has been (partially) formalized in many extensions of general relativity developed so far.
gstillwell
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 2.5 / 5 (4)
Dark matter is hyperdimensional effect, it's observable only from sufficient distance of massive body .

I couldnt disagree more!

Id like to formalize the model here particularly since you brought up the Pioneer anomaly which I have been studying for some time, but this is not the time or place. I do think we will soon discover that what we call Dark Matter is intrinsic to all matter local or non-local and is not mediated by a particle(s).
Noumenon
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 4.9 / 5 (29)
@Zephir
As I understand it, it's negligible for weak field, and already incorporated in Einstein's equations given non-linear solutions, and so is considered as space-time curvature in strong field. No reason to consider as "additional mass".
ZephirAWT
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
I do think we will soon discover that what we call Dark Matter is intrinsic to all matter local or non-local and is not mediated by a particle
This is what I'm saying, too...;-) But it doesn't mean, the dark matter doesn't exist. And because it's reall, massive field, it attracts and traps the normal particles of matter into itself (the particles of antimatter in particular) - which technically means, the particle and field effects of dark matter cannot be separated each other anyway.

Nature is always of dual nature and it doesn't like fundamentalists.
ZephirAWT
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
..No reason to consider as "additional mass"...
It depends on the observational perspective. Actually, most of these nifty "corrections of general relativity" are actually violating the equivalence principle, on which this relativity is based - which is why they're not accepted with enthusiasm by hard-core relativists.

It's quite easy to understand: in general relativity the inertia is always equivalent to mass. But the dark matter field is changing with density of object-for more dense objects it appears more pronounced, then for these sparse ones, because its source is curvature of space-time, not the mass itself.

Which is the reason, why the dark matter effects are quite weak for large bodies - only tiny particles and space-probes can be affected with it in in measurable way. It's not so difficult to understand, because it's large distance effect of shielding of CMBR fluctuations, i.e. dual to Casimir force - the surface area, rather than volume is significant here.
gstillwell
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
I think it (Dark Matter) has to do with a fundamental difference between inertial and gravitational mass as it relates to its position vector, of the test mass, within the curvature of a larger body, for example.

And more...
mlange
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
The XENON100 detector experiment is brilliant, however we (humans) are about to confirm that the anti-matter created at the time of the big bang (and the big bang will soon be disproven in it's curent state) is an inverse of matter which has a repulsive force gravitationally (anti gravity). Relativity mathematically proves this repulsion, but makes for a tough experiment. nonetheless, these particles did not annihilate at the time of the "bang" but instead move apart at an ever increasing rate. this phenomenon will explain dark matter & dark energy in the near future when they finally experimentally test matter & anti matter's gravitational effects on each other. We're unfortunately wrong on WIMPS and MACHOS. Looking for things that don't exist make them tough to find.
gstillwell
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Good luck with that!
jonnyboy
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
can't find what isn't there.
Parsec
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 4.4 / 5 (7)
"We found absolutely NOTHING! Send ten times more money please!"

You do understand that in science negative results can be as significant as positive ones? This is true in the same sense as when you looking for something. If you completely clean 3 rooms and verify absolutely that the missing thing is not in those rooms, you have narrowed your search to the rest of the house (analogous in this case to eliminating energies and types of particles corresponding to Dark Matter particles), or in fact completely outside the house (oops we better question more seriously the existence of dark matter at all).
maxcypher
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Y'all (You all) are so impatient! Dark Matter is.... (duh)Dark. As in: very hard to find. Until we allow for some serious time interval (after all, this is a serious matter), we won't have enough evidence to determine -- beyond a reasonable doubt -- whether DM exists or not. Until then, I'm agnostic on this issue.
gstillwell
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
In all research fields, current team based science is chocked with near retired senior scientists whose main focus has been to accept fashionable mainstream theories where the premise foundations for scientific argument are popular held beliefs based upon a system that perpetuates the closed minded certitude of the very few that impresses their way of thinking upon the many for a fleeting contemporary financial gain.

With this type of scientific system in place what do you think would happen if some lowly grad student from some backwater college or university came up with an elegant proof or some strong scientific results that completely dismissed the possibility dark matter existing altogether?

What do you think the senior scientist that just invested 8 years of his life and spent 230 million government dollars to build an advanced Dark Matter detection instrument in Antarctica would say?

Welcome to modern scientific thinking and research 2011!
typicalguy
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
I think this search is very important to prove/disprove DM as a WIMP. That said, the following sentence made me laugh...

"New data from the 2011 run, as well as the plan to build a much larger experiment in the coming years, promise an exciting decade in the search for the solution to one of nature's most fundamental mysteries."

Really? You consider sitting in a cave for 10 years doing nothing 99.99% of the time "exciting"?
typicalguy
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: not rated yet

That aside, given the recent 3 Sigma results at the CDF, perhaps these searches should begin to expand and look for technicolor DM candidates.
gstillwell
Apr 14, 2011

Rank: 1.5 / 5 (2)
Why so exotic of ideas for DM before standard candidate mechanisms havent been fully explored or even discussed?

If DM exists, it's something fundamental and we can't see it directly perhaps because of our reference position within the curvature metric of the Earth...kind of like a quantum decoherence of phased space-time.

As long as we think that DM is something that can't be found without large amounts of cash and huge powerful instruments we will be null-ing our way through much of the SM universe.
yep
Apr 15, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
No need for dark matter with an electric universe
Husky
Apr 17, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
they didn't find jack s***, 62 kg xenon is a pretty small cross-section, but given the sheer amount of shielding and money, needed to enclose this target, you don't start out with 1000 kg xenon and 10.000 tons of ultra pure copper, you do the small thing first and hope you get lucky, they did'nt strike gold, but at least validated many aspects of the searchmethod, wich i think is good enough to give them more candy for another go.
Rank 4.5 /5 (11 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • A Question relating Power
    created1 hour ago
  • Writing a book so im learning about things, i have some general questions please read
    created4 hours ago
  • Question about induced E field.
    created5 hours ago
  • Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
    created5 hours ago
  • Water Rocket
    created8 hours ago
  • why do trucks have bigger brakes?
    created13 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (15) | comments 40 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.2 / 5 (21) | comments 47 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 15 | with audio podcast

Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?

The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.

Physics / General Physics

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (3) | comments 8

Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector

A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 7 | with audio podcast


Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.