Worst over, but dangers persist at Japan plant

Apr 11, 2011 by Harumi Ozawa
This handout picture, taken by Tokyo Electric Power Co (TEPCO) on April 10, shows an aerial view of the first reactor building of TEPCO's No.1 Fukushima nuclear power plant at Okuma town. A month after a deadly quake-tsunami hit the plant, the risk of a huge radiation leak has fallen but the danger is far from over, experts say -- a risk brought sharply into focus by a powerful tremor Monday.

A month after a deadly quake-tsunami hit a Japanese nuclear plant, the risk of a huge radiation leak has fallen but the danger is far from over, experts say -- a risk brought sharply into focus by a powerful tremor Monday.

The 6.6-magnitude aftershock forced evacuation of workers from the Daiichi power plant and briefly cut power to three stricken reactors, straining nerves again in a country still battling the impact of the March 11 disasters.

"I would say it will take months just to decide how to improve the current condition," said Tetsunari Iida, director of Japan's Institute for Sustainable Energy Power.

"Workers are trying to resume power to the plant's cooling systems, as they had planned originally. But new problems keep coming up."

A month ago the 9.0 earthquake and tsunami ravaged swathes of Japan's northeast and cut power to the atomic plant, crippling cooling systems and causing partial meltdowns in the worst since Chernobyl.

The quake triggered an automatic shutdown, but the fuel rods continued to emit residual heat, which must be cooled with a constant flow of water to prevent overheating.

On Monday, the government said the probability of a massive leak of radioactive materials from the plant, 250 kilometres (155 miles) north of Tokyo, was reducing.

"The possibility that the situation at the nuclear plant will deteriorate and lead to new leakage of massive is becoming significantly smaller," said chief government spokesman Yukio Edano.

But while the danger of a catastrophe on the scale of Chernobyl appears to have been averted, experts say the plant's operator Tokyo Electric Power Company (TEPCO) cannot yet claim to have the situation under control.

Iida said that keeping the spent cool was the biggest challenge. Emergency crews are having to pump in large amounts of water, which must then be stored safely because of its high radiation content.

"The biggest difficulty at Fukushima is that workers have to keep injecting water without any real indication of when that process can stop," he said.

"In the meantime, they are creating large amounts of contaminated water and are being exposed to radiation."

The workers, whose ranks have swelled since the initial "Fukushima 50" and who have been hailed as heroes in Japan, have risked permanent health damage to fix disabled cooling systems and restore power to the plant.

Another expert with close knowledge of the emergency, who asked not to be named, said it would be "weeks or months" before the situation at the plant could be brought properly under control.

"Right now, we are waiting for the closed , which allow water to flow in a loop so that it does not have to be treated externally, to be brought back online," he said.

"That will be the first sign things are stabilising."

Experts also warn of the possible impact of aftershocks on the plant's quake-damaged structure.

"There is still thought to be radioactive gas seeping out as well as the odd small leak, but we are not seeing the kind of spikes in radioactivity we had in the early days," said a second expert with knowledge of the plant, who wished to remain anonymous.

"Nonetheless, there is still a risk of a hydrogen explosion, and we sadly cannot discount the effects of aftershocks on the damaged structure," he added.

Emergency workers last week began injecting inert nitrogen gas into reactor No. 1 in a bid to head off a possible explosion from a build-up of hydrogen reacting with oxygen from the air.

They have also dumped 11,500 tonnes of low-level radioactive water from the plant into the sea to free up urgently needed storage space for more highly toxic liquid.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) says the situation at the plant, 250 kilometres (155 miles) northeast of Tokyo, "remains very serious" but points to "early signs of recovery in some functions" including power supply.

Given the extent of the challenge, many believe international assistance should have been accepted earlier.

"The Japanese were overtaken by events," said one expert. "No one could have foreseen such a disastrous sequence of events."

Explore further: Global warming blamed for Pacific coral bleaching

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Japan atomic plant worker in hospital

Apr 10, 2011

A worker battling to cool overheating reactors at Japan's tsunami-hit nuclear plant was taken to hospital on Sunday after complaining of feeling sick, the plant's operator said.

Japan lacking radioactive water storage: US experts

Mar 28, 2011

Japan's Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant may have run out of room to store radioactive water, US scientists said Monday after the plant operator reported leaks that could contaminate the ocean.

US West Coast: on frontline from nuclear cloud?

Mar 14, 2011

California is closely watching the crisis at a Japanese nuclear plant, but officials downplayed the threat that a radioactive cloud blown across the Pacific could pose for the US West Coast.

Recommended for you

Rising anger as Nicaragua canal to break ground

20 hours ago

As a conscripted soldier during the Contra War of the 1980s, Esteban Ruiz used to flee from battles because he didn't want to have to kill anyone. But now, as the 47-year-old farmer prepares to fight for ...

Hopes, fears, doubts surround Cuba's oil future

Dec 20, 2014

One of the most prolific oil and gas basins on the planet sits just off Cuba's northwest coast, and the thaw in relations with the United States is giving rise to hopes that Cuba can now get in on the action.

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

hush1
not rated yet Apr 11, 2011
1.)Worst over, but dangers persist at Japan plant.
2.)Level 7

By definition the worst stops. At level 7.
Bitflux
1 / 5 (1) Apr 12, 2011
So now they can take it easy, even if one of the cores go critical and does a melt down, they wont have to adjust the level.

I hope Tepco's management gets to see all the children born in the future with deformaties and the boom in cancer that will occur. It seems like we humans are piss poor at learning from our mistakes.

Please sign in to add a comment. Registration is free, and takes less than a minute. Read more

Click here to reset your password.
Sign in to get notified via email when new comments are made.