Wikipedia deemed a reliable source for political info by new study

Apr 14, 2011

Not so long ago Wikipedia was considered a playground for Capitol Hill staffers to game the system and make "the boss look better and the opponent look ridiculous."

Now a peer-reviewed study by Brigham Young University Adam Brown validates as a reliable place to get a political education.

The research focused on past and present candidates for governor across the 50 states. Brown fact-checked biographical information and voting statistics and found very few inaccuracies.

"My finding is optimistic for the health of our country," said Brown, whose study appeared today in the journal PS: Political Science and Politics. "It doesn't have to be hard to learn about the political process, or your political candidates."

When Brown conducted the study, Wikipedia contained articles for 230 of the 246 major-party candidates that ran for governor between 1998 and 2008. Brown found that all of the verifiable biographical information in those articles was completely accurate.

Even though election statistics can be tricky topics as well, Brown found that most are trustworthy. He found only four articles that reported a difference of more than 1 percentage point from the actual election result.

Brown's study was modeled after a Nature investigation that pitted against Wikipedia on scientific articles. But Brown wondered whether "the free encyclopedia" would survive the heated debates and contradicting opinions of the political scene.

"The more an issue is talked about, the more people are battling over it on Wikipedia," Brown said.

The prominence of an issue is what drives up its accuracy. Brown said he found more facts missing among obscure or local political topics.

Like all encyclopedias Wikipedia should be used to get a general idea about a subject and then direct users to further sources. Most of all, Brown's study gives confidence that people can start getting more involved in politics by starting with Wikipedia.

"We don't need to worry about Wikipedia just because it's not Britannica, but that does not mean it is your stopping point," Brown said.

Explore further: A two generation lens: Current state policies fail to support families with young children

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Which politicians do voters blame for the down economy?

Aug 17, 2010

A down economy usually spells trouble for incumbents, but a new Brigham Young University study shows that six Republicans up for re-election this year caught a break when John McCain lost the last presidential election.

Study finds major U.S. newspapers are warming up to Wikipedia

Apr 12, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- Major newspapers in the United States are referencing Wikipedia more often and framing the online encyclopedia more positively in stories, according to a study by a pair of faculty researchers in the Virginia ...

Study suggests doctors could add to Wikipedia

Apr 30, 2009

(AP) -- Researchers are suggesting that doctors could be spending more time writing and editing Wikipedia pages on medical topics, despite questions that have been raised about the collaborative online encyclopedia's ...

Recommended for you

Scholar tracks the changing world of gay sexuality

Sep 19, 2014

With same-sex marriage now legalized in 19 states and laws making it impossible to ban homosexuals from serving in the military, gay, lesbian and bisexual people are now enjoying more freedoms and rights than ever before.

User comments : 1

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

6_6
not rated yet Apr 15, 2011
pff more like opinionbiasedopedia