Researchers take a step toward valleytronics

April 27, 2011

NRL researchers take a step toward valleytronics

Enlarge

The band structure of graphene with its two valleys is shown in blue and red. Credit: Naval Research Laboratory

Valley-based electronics, also known as valleytronics, is one step closer to reality. Two researchers at the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL) have shown that the valley degree of freedom in graphene can be polarized through scattering off a line defect. Unlike previously proposed valley filters in graphene, which rely on confined structures that have proven hard to achieve experimentally, the present work is based on a naturally occurring line defect that has already been observed.

The discovery was published in on March 28, 2011 and was also the subject of a separate Viewpoint article in Physics.

Information in , either classical or quantum, is generally carried by electrons and holes. The information can be encoded in various degrees of freedom such as charge or spin. Charge representations, for example the absence or presence of an electron in a quantum dot, are attractive as they are easily manipulated and interrogated through electric fields. The advantage of spin representations, used in the field of , is their superior shielding from undesired electric in the environment, making the information in these latter representations more robust. In the future, there might be a third middle-ground alternative in the valley degree of freedom that exists in certain , including graphene.

NRL researchers take a step toward valleytronics
Enlarge

This image shows an extended line defect in graphene. Credit: Naval Research Laboratory

The valley degree of freedom in graphene gained attention in 2007 when it was proposed that electrons and holes could be filtered according to which valley they occupy. Unfortunately, the structures required for this and subsequent valley filters are difficult to fabricate, and as a result a valley filter has yet to be demonstrated experimentally. The present study from NRL shows that an extended line defect in graphene acts as a natural valley filter. "As the structure is already available, we are hopeful that valley-polarized currents could be generated in the near future" said Dr. Daniel Gunlycke who made the discovery together with Dr. Carter White. Both work in NRL's Chemistry Division.

Valley refers to energy depressions in the band structure, which describes the energies of electron waves allowed by the symmetry of the crystal. For graphene, these regions form two pairs of cones that determine its low-bias response. As a large crystal momentum separates the two valleys, the valley degree of freedom is robust against slowly varying potentials, including scattering caused by low-energy acoustic phonons that often require low-bias electronic devices to operate at low temperatures typically only accessible in laboratories.

NRL researchers take a step toward valleytronics
Enlarge

Owing to symmetry, the electrons and holes in the blue (red) valley transmit (reflect). Credit: Naval Research Laboratory

Valley polarization is achieved when and holes in one valley are separated spatially from those in the other valley, but this is difficult to do as the two valleys have the same energies. It was found, however, that this spatial separation can be obtained in connected graphene structures that possess reflection symmetry along a particular crystallographic direction with no bonds crossing the reflection plane. This property turns out to be present in a recently observed line defect in graphene. The reflection symmetry only permits electron waves that are symmetric to pass through the line defect. Anti-symmetric waves are reflected. By projecting an arbitrary low-energy wave in graphene onto its symmetric component, one gets the transmission amplitude through this defect, which is strongly dependent on the valley. Electron and hole waves approaching the line defect at a high angle of incidence results in a polarization near 100%.

There is a long way to go before valleytronics can become a viable technology, explains Gunlycke. The recent advance, however, provides a realistic way to reach a crucial milestone in its development. This research was supported by the Office of Naval Research, both directly and through the Naval Research Laboratory.

Provided by Naval Research Laboratory search and more info website

4.7 /5 (7 votes)  

Filter


Move the slider to adjust rank threshold, so that you can hide some of the comments.


Display comments: newest first

maxcypher
Apr 27, 2011

Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Is there a "Valleytronics for Dummies"?
eachus
Apr 27, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Is there a "Valleytronics for Dummies"?


Or for that matter, a "Spintronics for Dummies"? Not really, but I can explain why there is so much interest in both.

Decades ago, a some computers used asynchronous logic. What this means is that instead of looking at one signal to see whether it is high or low, each bit requires two wires, one representing "1" and one "0". Why go to all this "extra" effort? In synchronous computers--the type you are using now--there is a clock signal which is distributed everywhere in the chip. I won't go into the difficulties with clock skew, etc., but there are two problems with synchronous circuits that cannot be worked around.

The first is that you have to wait for the worst case timing on an adder or a multiplier. Since bits are represented by the presence or absence of a signal at the clock "edge," you have to allow for the worst case cycle times.
eachus
Apr 27, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
The other problem is power, not only do the clock signals use a significant portion of the computer's entire power budget, but they use that power whether or not anything is happening. Thus modern CPU chips have special ways to shut off the clock signals to all or part of the chip to save power. But the circuitry shut off that way can't resume instantly. A few nanoseconds is not something that you will notice, but it means that aggressively shutting down clocks slows the overall performance of the chip.

Phew! That's the hard part--understanding why there is a problem. With spintronics and anything that allows for two different signals to travel on the same wire, designers can go back to asynchronous designs, but with one wire per bit, not two. Even better, all of the clock synchronization and distribution issues go away. Since you have one wire per bit, there are no skew issues, and circuits run as fast as they can, but no faster. ;-)
jjoensuu
Apr 27, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
So echus, why can the designers go to one wire per bit with spintronics? Is it because the single wire can carry both the voltage and the spin?

Also will there be (or is there) some sort of law comparable (in importance) to Ohms law also for spintronics?

And does spintronics also have components? Perhaps "spinresistors" and/or "spincapacitors"?
eachus
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
So eachus, why can the designers go to one wire per bit with spintronics? Is it because the single wire can carry both the voltage and the spin?


You could say it that way. When electrons arrive at every bit of a register the answer is encoded in the spin of the electrons (spin up or spin down). Reading the spins is, for the most part, not necessary. You add two numbers, multiply by a third, store the result and so on. If you are really tricky, you can keep the indicator bits as normal electronic signals, and the quantities as spins.

Also will there be (or is there) some sort of law comparable (in importance) to Ohms law also for spintronics?


Spintronics is regular electronics except that you align the spins (possibly from two different current sources) and occasionally you use the magnetic field from the spins to determine what number you have. Logic circuits are like any other Boolean logic, except that XOR is easier and NOT is harder. ;-)
eachus
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: 4.2 / 5 (5)
Hmm. For people who haven't studied digital logic or computer design the above is a bit sparse. If you didn't study Boolean algebra in school, find a web page. But computer design usually works at a higher level of abstraction, the register level.

A register is an ordered set of bits (ones and zeros) that will often have a fixed number of data bits, such as 32 or 64, and a name. (Yes, modern OoO CPUs cheat by renaming registers dynamically, but that is a detail.) A register will also have associated flag (or indicator) bits and may have associated parity bits. The important thing is that designers can specify what the various registers look like, plus specific design blocks like adders, multipliers, and so on. "Silicon compilers" take these register level designs convert them to the gate level, then place individual transistors and wires on the chip.

The important point is that spintronics, if the spins can be kept stable enough, can simplify--and speed up--processors.
jjoensuu
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Thank you eachus, your explanation is very clear.
AngryMoose
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Thank you eachus one of the best posts I've read on this site, was actually more interesting than the article.
Bonkers
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Hmm, spintronics - looks to more than double the complexity in order to halve the gatecount. I can't see it ever working, doubling density only offers 9 months advantage against Moore's Law, yet requires fundamental redesign and re-qualification. At present Silicon is pretty much unaffected by magnetic fields, spintronics will need to be proven against this new susceptibility.
On a similar note, we could move from binary electronics to a 3 or 4-level approach, much like multi-bit flash, OK we'd need to redesign every logic element (like spintronics) and the noise margins would reduce significantly (like..) - yet we haven't bothered.
So, I can't see a compelling reason for this technology.
Quantum computing? - that's a totally different story.
Bog_Mire
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Eachus, if you could prove you where born in the USA, I would vote you for Prez. And as long as you don't have suspicious head scars.
maxcypher
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
Eachus, could you explain how this "valleytronics" works?
FrankHerbert
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
@bog_mire

Just don't post here, okay?
Eikka
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
The thing is, asynchronous logic requires up to twice the number of transistors to implement, and it's not just a matter of having the 1s and 0s on two wires. Each piece of logic has to internally separate the control signal from the data signal, and then implement a synchronization mechanism so the operations are done in the correct order and correct times relative to each other, so that one bit doesn't fall off the calculation because it wasn't there on time.

So, it will have to save over 50% of power per transistor to be worthwhile, but it still takes twice the area on silicon, which is a bit difficult in the cost and yield perspective.

Spintronics will presumably make the multiplexing and separating of the control and data in one signal easier, but it won't make the logic itself any simpler.
Eikka
Apr 28, 2011

Rank: not rated yet
And the fact that you need to add catches and arbiters to prevent random glitches and unlucky flips of bits in the circuit from propagating also adds complexity and increases the number of transistors.

Synchronous logic avoids this problem by only doing anything on the clock, so it doesn't matter if the circuits flutter randomly out of order in the mean time as long as they settle down when it's time to pass the data.

Thirdly, there's no way of knowing accurately how long it takes for anything to happen in an asynchronous circuit, so real time control systems require additional circuitry to keep synchronization and time events. There is no fully asynchronous chip that could control e.g. a robot deterministically, when the chip can speed up or slow down depending on things like how hot it is, or if the supply voltage creeps up a little bit.

Rank 4.7 /5 (7 votes)
Relevant PhysicsForums posts
  • A Question relating Power
    created1 hour ago
  • Writing a book so im learning about things, i have some general questions please read
    created3 hours ago
  • Question about induced E field.
    created4 hours ago
  • Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
    created4 hours ago
  • Water Rocket
    created8 hours ago
  • why do trucks have bigger brakes?
    created12 hours ago
  • More from Physics Forums - General Physics

More news stories

Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?

(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 24, 2012 | popularity 4.7 / 5 (15) | comments 39 | with audio podcast feature

Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed

(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon – ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 25, 2012 | popularity 4.2 / 5 (21) | comments 47 | with audio podcast

Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector

Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.

Physics / General Physics

created May 23, 2012 | popularity 4 / 5 (7) | comments 15 | with audio podcast

Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?

The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.

Physics / General Physics

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.3 / 5 (3) | comments 8

Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector

A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...

Physics / General Physics

created May 21, 2012 | popularity 4.8 / 5 (16) | comments 7 | with audio podcast


Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history

(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.

Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice

(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors’ tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...

SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)

(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...

SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)

SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.

Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru

Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.

Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit

Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.