Swift, Hubble, Chandra telescopes join forces to observe unprecedented explosion
April 7, 2011 by Francis Reddy
Images from Swift's Ultraviolet/Optical (white, purple) and X-ray telescopes (yellow and red) were combined in this view of GRB 110328A. The blast was detected only in X-rays, which were collected over a 3.4-hour period on March 28. Credit: NASA/Swift/Stefan Immler
(PhysOrg.com) -- NASA's Swift, Hubble Space Telescope and Chandra X-ray Observatory have teamed up to study one of the most puzzling cosmic blasts yet observed. More than a week later, high-energy radiation continues to brighten and fade from its location.
Astronomers say they have never seen anything this bright, long-lasting and variable before. Usually, gamma-ray bursts mark the destruction of a massive star, but flaring emission from these events never lasts more than a few hours.
Although research is ongoing, astronomers say that the unusual blast likely arose when a star wandered too close to its galaxy's central black hole. Intense tidal forces tore the star apart, and the infalling gas continues to stream toward the hole. According to this model, the spinning black hole formed an outflowing jet along its rotational axis. A powerful blast of X- and gamma rays is seen if this jet is pointed in our direction.
On March 28, Swift's Burst Alert Telescope discovered the source in the constellation Draco when it erupted with the first in a series of powerful X-ray blasts. The satellite determined a position for the explosion, now cataloged as gamma-ray burst (GRB) 110328A, and informed astronomers worldwide.
As dozens of telescopes turned to study the spot, astronomers quickly noticed that a small, distant galaxy appeared very near the Swift position. A deep image taken by Hubble on April 4 pinpoints the source of the explosion at the center of this galaxy, which lies 3.8 billion light-years away.
This is a visible-light image of GRB 110328A's host galaxy (arrow) taken on April 4 by the Hubble Space Telescope's Wide Field Camera 3. The galaxy is 3.8 billion light-years away. Credit: NASA/ESA/A. Fruchter (STScI)
That same day, astronomers used NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory to make a four-hour-long exposure of the puzzling source. The image, which locates the object 10 times more precisely than Swift can, shows that it lies at the center of the galaxy Hubble imaged."We know of objects in our own galaxy that can produce repeated bursts, but they are thousands to millions of times less powerful than the bursts we are seeing now. This is truly extraordinary," said Andrew Fruchter at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore.
"We have been eagerly awaiting the Hubble observation," said Neil Gehrels, the lead scientist for Swift at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "The fact that the explosion occurred in the center of a galaxy tells us it is most likely associated with a massive black hole. This solves a key question about the mysterious event."
NASA's Chandra X-ray Observatory completed this four-hour exposure of GRB 110328A on April 4. The center of the X-ray source corresponds to the very center of the host galaxy imaged by Hubble (red cross). Credit: NASA/CXC/ Warwick/A. Levan
Most galaxies, including our own, contain central black holes with millions of times the sun's mass; those in the largest galaxies can be a thousand times larger. The disrupted star probably succumbed to a black hole less massive than the Milky Way's, which has a mass four million times that of our sunAstronomers previously have detected stars disrupted by supermassive black holes, but none have shown the X-ray brightness and variability seen in GRB 110328A. The source has repeatedly flared. Since April 3, for example, it has brightened by more than five times.
Scientists think that the X-rays may be coming from matter moving near the speed of light in a particle jet that forms as the star's gas falls toward the black hole.
GRB 110328A has repeatedly flared in the days following its discovery by Swift. This plot shows the brightness changes recorded by Swift's X-ray Telescope. Credit: NASA/Swift/Penn State/J. Kennea
"The best explanation at the moment is that we happen to be looking down the barrel of this jet," said Andrew Levan at the University of Warwick in the United Kingdom, who led the Chandra observations. "When we look straight down these jets, a brightness boost lets us view details we might otherwise miss."This brightness increase, which is called relativistic beaming, occurs when matter moving close to the speed of light is viewed nearly head on.
Astronomers plan additional Hubble observations to see if the galaxy's core changes brightness.
Provided by
NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
31 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (20) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
2
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
2
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
22 hours ago |
5 / 5 (6) |
0
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Browser wars flare in mobile space
The browser wars are heating up again, but this time the fight is for dominance of the mobile Internet.
Nvidia trumpets Tegra 3 phone design wins for 2012
(Phys.org) -- Nvidias competitive war paint has a name, Tegra 3. On the heels of Nvidia announcements about lowering costs of its Tegra 3 processors and Nvidia-enabled tablets running Android Ice Cream ...
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.



Apr 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (10)
The energy source that powers cosmic explosions is probably neutron repulsion [Neutron Repulsion, The APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages]
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
Observations like these that will confirm or deny conclusions that are based on nuclear rest mass data.
With kind regards,
Oliver K. Manuel
Former NASA Principal
Investigator for Apollo
Apr 07, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (7)
Apr 07, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Smaller objects should fall on it from time to time.
Apr 07, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (8)
Thanks for your comment. I do not want to annoy others, although I sometimes feel like Archimedes must have felt when he shouted, "Eureka!"
Neutron repulsion does not power ice cream, red dresses, water balloons and lottery tickets.
But I have been amazed at how many things may be powered by this most powerful nuclear force, since it was first recognized in 2000:
www.omatumr.com/D...Data.htm
The Sun
Life on Earth
Cosmic explosions
Supernova explosions
Fragmentation of galactic centers
Nuclear reactors and the atomic bomb
1. See this brief video on neutron repulsion:
www.youtube.com/w...yLYSiPO0
2. This research report, "Neutron Repulsion" [The APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages]
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
Apr 07, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (6)
Apr 08, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
OK time to ask again.
Do you think neutron repulsion is a long range force or a short ranges force? What distinguishes it from the Pauli Exclusion Principle?
Please note that on most of the other sites that allow alternate to mainstream theory the theorist is REQUIRED to answer questions and to NOT spam the site. Which I think is much better than simply disallowing alternate theory. However you refuse to answer legitimate questions and you are spamming this site. Must be one of the few you have yet to be banned from.
So how about you answer the question.
Ethelred
Apr 08, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (8)
Oh, please...
The moment and the insight attributed to Archimedes was one of great clarity, usefulness, and genius. You compare yourself to him? Really?
You're a fringe crank, spamming obscure corners of the internet with a theory that does not seem to hold up to even mild questioning.
There *is* no comparison. Delusions of grandeur, I'm sorry to say...
I do wonder, though... The sheer volume of your monotone posts. Is it a symptom of a true mania? Or a calculated attempt to swamp google search results - in order to bury the articles relating to your alleged sexual abuse of the children in your 'care'?
Archimedes, indeed...
Apr 08, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (6)
Dementia perhaps?
Apr 09, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Oh PaulieCrank, I see you don't limit your attacks to me. You're an equal opportunity self-proclaimed genious flamer.
Folks, this yahoo spends his time on PhysOrg looking for people to attack and contributing nothing.
Apr 11, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Perhaps you would like to defend hit pet theory? Tell us, then, how is it that our sun has a neutron star at its core, despite the Chandrasekhar limit, which descibes the minimum mass of such a body as 1.4 solar masses? Where did Chandrasekhar go wrong?
Apr 11, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (3)
It also pisses me off that EVERY time i see his username i can't help but think about how he was arrested for the rape and sodomy of his own children.
I also wonder if this communication he is currently having with children under the age of 18 is in prohibition of his legal standing. Yes there are people under the age of 18 that he has been speaking to right here on this website.
Apr 13, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
Apr 19, 2011
Rank: 2 / 5 (4)
Apr 19, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
1. "Quantum states of neutrons in the Earth's gravitational field", Nature 415 (2002) 297-299]
www.nature.com/na...97a.html
2. "Realization of a gravity-resonance-spectroscopy technique", Nature Physics, Published Online 17 April 2011 doi:10.1038/nphys1970 ]
www.nature.com/np...970.html
3. "Ultra-cold neutrons: Quantum bouncing ball resonates", Nature Physics, Published Online 17 April 2011 doi:10.1038/nphys1990 ]
www.nature.com/np...990.html
4. Rumors that Fermilab's CDF team studied collisions between Protons and anti-Protons and independently found evidence for a strong repulsive nuclear force.
5. "Neutron Repulsion", The APEIRON Journal, 19 pages (2011) in press.
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1
May 10, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)