Pandora subpoenaed in information-sharing inquiry

Apr 04, 2011
A man displays an iPhone in 2009. Internet radio service Pandora said Monday that it has been asked for information by a US grand jury evidently looking into how smartphone applications tap into people's data.

Online radio service Pandora has received a subpoena from a federal grand jury investigating whether popular smartphone applications share information about their users with advertisers and other third parties.

Pandora says it believes it is one of many companies to receive subpoenas in a probe into the information-sharing practices of publishers that make apps for the iPhone and other Apple Inc. devices, as well as smartphones that run on Google Inc.'s Android operating system.

Pandora says it shares information with third parties to help it track how users interact with the service and to deliver targeted advertising. But the Oakland, Calif.-based company says it is "not a specific target" of the grand jury investigation.

The company noted the development in a filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission detailing plans for an initial public offering. Pandora declined to comment or provide additional information about the probe.

The disclosure comes at a time of mounting concern about Internet privacy in Washington and growing unease about the vast amounts of personal information that companies are scooping up online - from Web browsing habits to smartphone locations to Facebook preferences - and then mining to target advertising.

The Commerce Department has called for the creation of a "privacy bill of rights" for Internet users to set ground rules for companies that collect consumer data online and use that information for marketing and other purposes.

The Federal Trade Commission has proposed the creation of a "Do Not Track" tool to let consumers stop or restrict advertisers from studying their online behavior in order to target ads. The tool would most likely take the form of a Web browser setting that travels with a user from site to site and informs websites when tracking is off limits.

In its filing, Pandora said that a government Do Not Track mandate "could significantly hinder our ability to collect and use data relating to listeners."

Explore further: Second apparent leak of hacked celebrity nude pictures: US media

not rated yet
add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Palm seeking applications for Pre smartphone

Apr 02, 2009

Palm is inviting outside developers to tailor applications for eagerly-awaited Pre smartphones that will be taking on heavyweights such as iPhone and BlackBerry.

Blackberry buddies up to game developers

Nov 09, 2009

Research In Motion (RIM) on Monday announced it is making Blackberry devices friendlier to game applications, as the business-oriented smartphones try to show a more playful side.

Cars the next frontier for Pandora

Jan 08, 2011

Internet radio star Pandora has topped 75 million users in the United States and is expanding into cars but it will be awhile before music fans abroad can enjoy their own personal stations.

Recommended for you

Facebook dressed down over 'real names' policy

Sep 17, 2014

Facebook says it temporarily restored hundreds of deleted profiles of self-described drag queens and others, but declined to change a policy requiring account holders to use their real names rather than drag names such as ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
1 / 5 (1) Apr 04, 2011
Translation:

"It's a computer. Eventually there'll be viruses, worms, and trojans. Protect yourself."
J-n
not rated yet Apr 05, 2011
QC... read the article, it's not about that at all.

now about the article:

In its filing, Pandora said that a government Do Not Track mandate "could significantly hinder our ability to collect and use data relating to listeners."[q/]

If that's what the users of Pandora want, that's what they'll do. I think these companies believe that they are entitled to their users personal information as a revenue source. If my information is worth money, i should be allowed to sell it or keep it private for myself, depending on MY choice, not someone else.

As far as i know it's not legal for someone else to take something that belongs to me and to sell it or even give it away. Why is my personal information any different?