The penultimate supper?

Apr 18, 2011
Leonardo Da Vinci's depiction of the Last Supper. Credit: Wikimedia commons

The Last Supper, which millions of Christians will mark on Maundy Thursday as Easter begins this week, actually took place on a Wednesday, a groundbreaking study is to reveal.

The dramatic claim is the principal conclusion of a new book in which Professor Sir Colin Humphreys, a scientist at the University of Cambridge, argues that he has solved what the eminent Biblical scholar, F. F. Bruce, once described as “the thorniest problem in the New Testament”.

Researchers have puzzled for centuries over the precise nature and timing of Jesus’ final meal with his disciples. At the heart of the problem is an apparently fundamental contradiction in the Gospels. Matthew, Mark and Luke all assert that the Last Supper was a meal marking the start of the Jewish festival of Passover. John, by contrast, says that it took place before the Passover began.

Writing in "The Mystery Of The Last Supper," Professor Humphreys proposes a new solution, based on a combination of Biblical, historical and astronomical research. The core of his argument is that Jesus used a different to that conventionally accepted by Jews at the time. According to this different system, the Last Supper would have fallen on the Wednesday, and not the Thursday, of what is now called Holy Week.

“Whatever you think about the Bible, the fact is that Jewish people would never mistake the Passover meal for another meal, so for the Gospels to contradict themselves in this regard is really hard to understand,” Professor Humphreys said.

“Many Biblical scholars say that, for this reason, you can’t trust the Gospels at all. But if we use science and the Gospels hand in hand, we can actually prove that there was no contradiction. In addition, this research seems to present a case for finally introducing a fixed date for Easter.”

The new study is based on earlier research which Professor Humphreys carried out with the Oxford astrophysicist, Graeme Waddington, in 1983. This identified the date of Jesus’ crucifixion as the morning of Friday, April 3rd, AD 33 – which has since been widely accepted by other scholars as well.

For Professor Humphreys, who only studies the Bible when not pursuing his day-job as a materials scientist, this presented an opportunity to deal with the equally difficult issue of when (and how) Jesus’ Last Supper really took place.

Aside from the basic contradiction posed by three Gospels’ reference to a Passover meal, all four present a logistical problem. If, according to the Holy Week model, the Last Supper was on a Thursday, then for Jesus to have been executed on a Friday morning, a large number of events had to take place overnight: These included his arrest, interrogation, and separate trials before the Jewish court (the Sanhedrin), Pontius Pilate and Herod.

Even for the alleged son of God, squeezing all of this in would have been an ask. In addition, it was against Jewish law for the Sanhedrin to meet at night. Suspiciously, all of the Gospels also omit to mention what happened on the Wednesday of Holy Week.

If Jesus died on April 3rd, the standard Jewish calendar of AD33 would have placed his crucifixion on the 14th day of the Jewish month of Nisan. The Passover meal, however, falls on the 15th – which supports John’s account, but not those of the other Gospels.

Humphreys is not the first researcher to suggest that Jesus might, therefore, have been using a different calendar altogether. Most recently, the Pope suggested in 2007 that Jesus used the solar calendar of the Qumran community, which was probably employed by a Jewish sect called the Essenes and is described in the Dead Sea Scrolls. As Humphreys shows, however, when the date of Passover is calculated using this calendar, it would have fallen a week later, after both Jesus’ death and resurrection.

For the first time, Humphreys investigates the possibility that a third calendar was in use. The official Jewish calendar at the time of Jesus’ death was that still used by Jews today; a lunar system in which days run from sunset to sunset. This was developed during the Jewish exile in Babylon in the 6th century BC.

Beforehand, however, the Jews had a different system. This is referred to in the Book of Exodus in the Old Testament, when God instructs Moses and Aaron to start their year at the time of the Exodus from Egypt. Humphreys argues that this system would have been an adaptation of the Egyptian lunar calendar (confusingly one of two systems used by the Egyptians), in which the start of the year was redated to occur in the spring.

There is, he adds, extensive evidence to suggest that this survived as more than a remnant into Jesus’ time. Not all Jews were exiled in Babylon. Those who remained retained the old system of marking the days, and by the 1st century AD, groups such as the Samaritans, Zealots, some Galileans and some Essenes (who may well have provided Jesus with the accommodation used for the Last Supper), were still abiding by the old system.

Under this, pre-exilic, calendar, Passover always fell earlier and the days were marked from sunrise to sunrise, not sunset to sunset. In AD33, the Passover meal would have occurred on the Wednesday of Holy Week, which presuming Jesus, Matthew, Mark and Luke all used pre-exilic dating, and John does not, resolves both the contradictions in the Gospels and means that the events they describe could have taken place on Thursday, at a more leisurely pace and in accordance with Jewish law.

Jesus also had the motivation to use the earlier dating system developed by Moses. The Gospels are littered with examples of him presenting himself as the new Moses. According to Luke, he even said during the Last Supper that he was making a “new covenant” with his disciples – a direct reference to the covenant made between God and the Jewish people through Moses in Exodus.

In many ways, therefore, Humphreys suggests that the Last Supper was a positioning exercise on Jesus’ part, which gave him ample reason to use the pre-exilic calendar. “Jesus was identifying himself explicitly with Moses,” he said. “He was setting himself up as a deliberate parallel. He then died on Nisan 14th, just as the Passover lambs were being slain according to the official Jewish calendar as well. These are deep, powerful symbolisms – and they can be based on objective, historical evidence.”

Explore further: Best of Last Week – Evidence of quark-gluon interactions, new portable device hack and why we may never live forever

More information: The Mystery of the Last Supper, by Professor Sir Colin Humphreys, is published by Cambridge University Press.

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Who was Jesus?

Mar 10, 2009

The historical person Jesus of Nazareth - beyond the accounts in the creeds and the Gospels, which are all characterized by religious belief - is the focus of Tobias Hägerland's dissertation from the University of Gothenburg, ...

Experts split on supposed Jesus tomb

Jan 18, 2008

Archaeologists, biblical scholars and other experts met in Jerusalem this week to discuss a tomb that might be that of Jesus and his family.

Biblical pool discovered in Jerusalem

Aug 10, 2005

Sewer workers in Jerusalem have reportedly discovered the biblical Pool of Siloam -- an ancient gathering place for Jews and a holy Christian site.

What do we really know about the crucifixion of Jesus?

Jun 14, 2010

The many different accounts of the crucifixion of Jesus find little support in historical sources. The reason is that antique sources generally lack descriptions of crucifixions, says Gunnar Samuelsson, University of Gothenburg, ...

2,000-year-old nails 'may be tied to crucifixion'

Apr 13, 2011

Two Roman nails dating back 2000 years, found in the burial cave of the Jewish high priest who handed Jesus over to the Romans, may be linked to the crucifixion, an Israeli filmmaker has claimed.

First Jesus-era house discovered in Nazareth

Dec 21, 2009

(AP) -- Just in time for Christmas, archaeologists on Monday unveiled what may have been the home of one of Jesus' childhood neighbors. The humble dwelling is the first dating to the era of Jesus to be discovered ...

Recommended for you

Animals first flex their muscles

10 hours ago

An unusual new fossil discovery of one of the earliest animals on earth may also provide the oldest evidence of muscle tissue – the bundles of cells that make movement in animals possible.

Fact or fiction: Which do moviegoers prefer?

15 hours ago

Do you feel sadder watching a documentary about war or a drama about a young person dying of cancer? According to a new study in the Journal of Consumer Research, consumers mistakenly believe they will have stronger emotio ...

User comments : 19

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

CapitalismPrevails
3 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2011
Athiest Physorg readers, prepare to go bonkers in 5..4..3..2..1..
Donutz
5 / 5 (12) Apr 18, 2011
Why? This is a total non-event.
CapitalismPrevails
3.3 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2011
For even bringing up religion on a science and engineering website.
Donutz
4.3 / 5 (6) Apr 18, 2011
Reporting is reporting. Comparitive Religion is a valid university course. The only real claim made in this article that's even remotely controversial is that Jesus existed. And frankly, Occam's Razor says he likely did exist, although his name was probably "Yeshua". But so what? That's an entirely different subject from questions of divinity or existance of a god or gods. Bring *THAT* up and we'll have a party!
flashgordon
3.8 / 5 (4) Apr 18, 2011
I have no problem with archaeology being posted here. I love ruins and history; it's how I got into the biblical thing in the first place.

But, this stuff just ignores evidences either right in their faces or is ignorant of all kinds of problems. There's the eluessian mysteries(Jesus Christ also turns water into wine just as Dionysius) that the Last supper is analogous to. There's the fact that the Gospels are late constuctions(so much points here that I'm certainly not going to post in one reply); they are after the Pauline epistles. There's no historians of the period who ever mentions a Jesus Christ.

Then, there's my point about how most people born in a given country take on that countries dominant religion is some form or another. I mean if they were muslims they wouldn't be posting this but muhammad stuff; or if they were Oriental, they'd be argueing that Buddha was the real Jesus Christ or something.
flashgordon
3 / 5 (2) Apr 18, 2011
Occams razer donutz says Jesus Christ most likely did not exist! See my post above!
JRDarby
5 / 5 (5) Apr 18, 2011
"'[S]o for the Gospels to contradict themselves in this regard is really hard to understand, Professor Humphreys said.'"

Hahaha...
neutrinoman
1 / 5 (7) Apr 18, 2011
Eleven of the twelve original apostles died as martyrs. In Roman times, if a rebel sect lost its leader via state execution, the movement scattered, withered and died. With the Nazarene, we have men willing to die, not fearing mortal death. For what? Unknown scientifically, but one thing is for certain -- they did not fear death. We also have historical reference to Saul/Paul and Peter in Rome, both of whom have had their tombs identified, with Peter's alleged skeleton fitting his profile at death -- a older man crucified upside down, as legend has it (the feet are missing from the skeleton, hacked down by the Romans after death). But it is the Roman historian Josephus who mentions Jesus (Greek for Yeshua) by name as a rebel preacher who was nailed to a tree for his crimes. So the character has pedigree, and the movement has defiance and the followers have faith in a life after death. This alone is impressive. Anything more is simply a matter of faith.
Norezar
5 / 5 (4) Apr 19, 2011
For even bringing up religion on a science and engineering website.


It is kind of strange, isn't it?

Next it'll be "New ground-breaking discovery! Easter Bunny not really a rabbit, but a fatman in a fursuit!"
Alexander_Herrmann
2 / 5 (1) Apr 19, 2011
They are definitly bias on Jesus. Never saw a story abut Buddha or Muhhamed.
Archaeology when objective is science imo and all who did leave a comment sem to have read the article anyway.
Egleton
1.7 / 5 (3) Apr 19, 2011
I am a Deist.
Gaze the yawning chasms of your ignorance, ape.

So we slaughtered the link as we slaughtered the lambs.
You feel nothing?
Then you are lost.
COCO
5 / 5 (1) Apr 19, 2011
this stuff is as silly as NIST wrt 911 - total fabrication for an agenda of ignorance and violence to continue - well done PHYSORG
panorama
not rated yet Apr 19, 2011
There's the eluessian mysteries(Jesus Christ also turns water into wine just as Dionysius) that the Last supper is analogous to.
Jesus was totally metal though, he took it one step further and changed that wine to blood.
Donutz
5 / 5 (2) Apr 19, 2011
Occams razer donutz says Jesus Christ most likely did not exist! See my post above!


Jesus CHRIST definitely did not exist, since the title 'CHRIST' implies divinity, and anyway the title got thoroughly mangled from its orginal meaning in order to be shoehorned onto Jesus. But at the time we're talking about, there were a number or wandering holy men preaching reformist judaism, in various flavours more or less similar to what's mentioned in the new testament. That one of these guys might be named 'Yeshua' is not much of a stretch. And like most legends, there is more likely a real person at the base of it. But like most legends, the tale grew in the telling.
Donutz
5 / 5 (3) Apr 19, 2011
So the character has pedigree, and the movement has defiance and the followers have faith in a life after death. This alone is impressive. Anything more is simply a matter of faith.


I'm not all that impressed. Buddhist monks purposely immolate themselves by way of protest. If you were fair and objective, you could come up with any number of examples of similar bravery, for any number of movements or causes, political, spiritual, or otherwise. When you really examine it objectively, there's nothing unique at all about christianity. Not the books, not the beliefs, not the teachings, not the behaviours of the believers, and not the way it grew legs.
tjcoop3
1 / 5 (2) Apr 19, 2011
Actually we know that the teachers of Jesus' day often had a passover meal the night before with their followers and the formal one on the evening of Pesach itself. He could have only been crucified on Wed since He had said he would rise after 3 days and nights. Meaning he celebrated the meal on our Tues and, since He was the Lamb foreshadowed in the Pesach He would have spoke it is finished at the exact moment of the Pesach lamb's death in the Temple which He likely could actually see from where He was crucified.
flashgordon
1 / 5 (3) Apr 20, 2011
It's remarkable somebody says Josephus mentions Jesus Christ and doens't know that is an interpolation. Just comes to show the corrupt understandings and poor scholarship of contemporary scientists.
Jimee
3 / 5 (1) Apr 23, 2011
If Jesus existed, and really made a difference in people who believed, then religion (khristianity) would not crave ignorance, hate, and lies. Because khristianity can only exist in a state of ignorance, guilt, and fear our country, world and our very lives are all in danger
antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (1) Apr 24, 2011
And in other news: A sack of rice fell over in China.