Overturned scientific explanation may be good news for nuclear fusion
A hydrogen atom slams into boron to make three alpha particles. Credit: Focus Fusion Society. Click "Enlarge" for animation.
Flat out wrong. Thats what a team of Duke researchers has discovered, much to its surprise, about a long-accepted explanation of how nuclei collide to produce charged particles for electricity a process receiving intense interest lately from scientists, entrepreneurs and policy makers in the wake of Japans nuclear crisis.
Plasma physicists have been trying for 25 years to create electricity from the fusion of boron and hydrogen atoms.
The new study says their efforts have been based on a misunderstanding of the underlying physics although the error could end up actually helping those looking to fusion energy as an alternative energy source.
Researchers have been developing reactors to slam hydrogen at high speeds into boron-11, a collision that yields high-energy helium nuclei, or alpha particles. Those alphas then spiral through a tunnel of electromagnetic coils, transforming them into a flow of electrons, or electricity.
Obviously, a detailed understanding of the energy and location of every outgoing alpha particle is crucial to the development of this reactor, says Duke nuclear physicist Henry Weller, a co-author of the new study.
Weller and his colleagues took a fresh look at the hydrogen-boron reaction at the Triangle Universities Nuclear Laboratory (TUNL) on Dukes campus. They expected to confirm the accepted wisdom that a collision of one hydrogen particle and one boron-11 particle produces a single high-energy alpha particle -- which produces electricity well and two lower energy alphas, which are less useful for generating electricity.
Instead, the team found the collision yields two high-energy alphas, which shoot off at an angle of 155 degrees, along with one lower-energy alpha. The existence of this second high-energy alpha could mean these kinds of fusion systems are able to produce much more electricity than expected, says Duke nuclear physicist and study co-author Mohammad Ahmed. The results appear online in Physics Letters B.
The unexpected finding appears to confirm a long-forgotten observation from physicists at Cavendish Laboratory in Cambridge, England. In 1936, they made crude, but apparently correct, estimates of the two higher-energy alphas.
Their results were buried in history until now, Ahmed says.
Now, 75 years later, the new insight makes the boron-fusion reaction even more interesting as a possible alternative to the nuclear fission process used in reactors in Japan and other parts of the world. A reactor based on this process could produce electricity without radioactive wastes. It also would not produce the carbon dioxide and other gases emitted by coal-powered plants.
Nuclear fusion still faces formidable challenges, one of the greatest being that hydrogen and boron only begin to fuse at temperatures close to 1 billion degrees Kelvin (nearly 2 billion degrees Fahrenheit). But building this type of reactor is realistic, says Weller, whose team is continuing to study the process at TUNL.
Provided by
Duke University
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
A Question relating Power
1 hour ago
-
Writing a book so im learning about things, i have some general questions please read
4 hours ago
-
Question about induced E field.
5 hours ago
-
Charging a capacitor in a tesla coil
5 hours ago
-
Water Rocket
8 hours ago
-
why do trucks have bigger brakes?
13 hours ago
- More from Physics Forums - General Physics
More news stories
Is a classical electrodynamics law incompatible with special relativity?
(Phys.org) -- The laws of classical electromagnetism that were developed in the 19th century are the same laws that scientists use today. They include Maxwell’s four equations along with the Lorentz la ...
Landmark calculation clears the way to answering how matter is formed
(Phys.org) -- An international collaboration of scientists, including Thomas Blum, associate professor of physics, is reporting in landmark detail the decay process of a subatomic particle called a kaon ...
May 25, 2012 |
4.2 / 5 (21) |
47
|
Lying in wait for WIMPs: Researchers seek to dramatically increase sensitivity of Large Underground Xenon detector
Although it's invisible, dark matter accounts for at least 80 percent of the matter in the universe. No one knows what it is, but most scientists would bet on weakly interacting massive particles, or WIMPs.
May 23, 2012 |
4 / 5 (7) |
15
|
Hall effect at the speed of light: How can you demonstrate relativistic effects with your mobile phone?
The relativistic Hall effect describing objects rotating at speeds comparable with the speed of light has been reported.
May 21, 2012 |
4.3 / 5 (3) |
8
Cloak of invisibility: Engineers use plasmonics to create an invisible photodetector
A team of engineers at Stanford and the University of Pennsylvania has for the first time used "plasmonic cloaking" to create a device that can see without being seen - an invisible machine that detects light. It is the first ...
May 21, 2012 |
4.8 / 5 (16) |
7
|
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (56)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (11)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (15)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (12)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (8)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 2.3 / 5 (8)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
At least in this particular topic, yes.
Although most "mainstream scientists" have had nothing to do with it whatsoever.
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (4)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (4)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (8)
Meaning the energy comes from fission, not fusion.
In fusion you input energy for fusion. Here you input energy for fission.
Conclusion: fission.
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (10)
No potentially ruinous or destabilyzing technology will be allowed to emerge until the world is ready for it. Period. Economic or political collapse are not options. Unless they are Planned.You know, personally I would tend to defer to trained and learned plasma physicists who are obviously qualified to know which is which, rather than trying to second-guess them and look like a dimwit, you know? Anybody check the original paper?
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (11)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
http://www.aether...sion.gif
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 4.6 / 5 (10)
The hydrogen-boron reaction does not make the reactor significantly radioactive because no free neutrons are involved in the reaction.
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1.8 / 5 (5)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1.2 / 5 (55)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 2.2 / 5 (5)
It does, just in lower extent, comparable to freshly cooled Fukushima reactor. You wouldn't survive it.
http://en.wikiped..._reactor
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 3.7 / 5 (3)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
The short answer is that Boron is a chemical element number 5 on the periodic table. It commonly has six neutrons, around 20% of the element has five neutrons in the nucleus. Both isotopes are stable.
The longer answer I can not relate here. This is a very fundamental question to a very detailed subject. I hope you take the time to investigate and study it further.
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (15)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (10)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 3.6 / 5 (13)
Apr 04, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
In fact, this is a great danger. Somewhat unstable isotopes tend to have long half-lives, so they stick around longer. It really depends on the elemental composition of the reactor shielding.
Fortunately, even very high alpha particle densities are absorbed by a very small amount of shielding. Neutrons really penetrate.
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (7)
So to me, any additional reactions, and the waste heat they make, should be beneficial...
I realize fusion reactors are a lot more complicated internally than fission reactors, so maybe radioactive by-products would destroy the systems, so that might be the issue you guys are talking about, as it would clearly be too expensive to replace these systems over and over again.
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: 3.4 / 5 (7)
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Are you referring to Andrea A. Rossi Cold Fusion Generator reportedly achieved 10 kilowatts of heat power with nickel and hydrogen on January 14, 2011?
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (9)
An interesting point about conspiracy theorists is, that somebody has to be in control, always. To think that the ship is sailing and nobody is at the wheel is even scarier than the idea of mysterious elites or hidden evil world governments, or aliens who are running everything behind the curtains.
And that is truly fascinating. Outside of pathological cases like paranoid schitzophrenics, I would like to know why the idea of nobody running the show is so unplausible to them that they need to see a will and a purpose where there is none?
Perhaps, in this case, the contemporary scientists didn't think much of the experiment because it was so crude, and then simply forgot about it and didn't repeat it because they became more interested in something else.
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Apr 05, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (9)
IF YOU LOOK at history you can begin to make an extensive list of technologies and information that was sequestered until such time as it was safe to develop it. Check out the current physorg story on the ankylothera device. Add that to the great PILE of tech that mysteriously disappeared. The great alexandrian library was burned ON PURPOSE. Out of the thousands of precolombian mesoamerican books, only THREE survived. By accident. Dont be a puppet or a parrot. Use your brain. Think.
Apr 06, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 06, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
The world of Erikas&Ottos were supposed to find common ground.
Strange, that the greatest inspirations and motivations (for common ground?, human welfare?)comes from what humans label Nature. And not what humans label human.
To find the mutual benefits of mutual admonitions, one has to become a third party to one's own two party discourse.
That attempt was suggested:
The worst case scenario or outcome to such discourse is no concession.
The best case scenario or outcome to such discourse the world has yet to see.
I'm sure Nature will always 'remind' us about knowledge that is always present. Always accessible, over and over again, despite human bookkeeping.
Apr 06, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
http://www.lenr-c...xces.pdf
Why this finding was completely ignored for years? I don't believe in conspiracy theories, but emergence. If every person in the crowd makes only tiny step against wall, some people near wall will be always crushed.
"In a huge, grandiose convention center I found about 200 extremely conventional-looking scientists, almost all of them male and over 50. In fact some seemed over 70, and I realized why: The younger ones had bailed years ago, fearing career damage from the cold fusion stigma."
http://www.wired...._pr.html
It's the same cowardliness, which enabled Nazi power or the communistic regimes living well for so many years.
Apr 06, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
That seems somewhat ... paranoid. Or overly ordered, at least.
Lots of things happen that are ruinous or destabilizing at all levels of civilization all the time. Sometimes, the crisis is averted, sometimes it changes everything, sometimes we read about that former civilization in history books.
It is madness (or at least madly egotistical) to try to control everything, and in the end it makes all of us less free to "the authorities" to try. Just remember, there are always unintended consequences to every action, regardless of the good intent.
Apr 08, 2011
Rank: 4 / 5 (1)
Remember Mickelson-Morely and the failure of the Ether?
Only by killing our pet theories can real progress be made.
First nickel/hydrogen and now boron/hydrogen.
Things are hotting up in the basement.
Apr 09, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
Apr 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 09, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
High temperature does not high heat make, necessarily.
Apr 10, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Rossi Cold Fusion Validated by Swedish Skeptic's Society
Yet another test of Andrea Rossi's Energy Catalyzer (E-Cat) has been performed on a 4.5 kW version near the University of Bologna. This time a new set of observers were present, one of which is the chairman of the Swedish Skeptics Society, who confirmed that Copper is being formed from Hydrogen and Nickel -- cold fusion!
http://pesn.com/2...Society/
looks like even people living in there small dark boxes of there own little minds are waking up
case in point Swedish Skeptic's Society cofirms cold fusion in Adrea Rossi`s E-cat device.
Apr 10, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (1)
This is a perfect example of how mainstream physics made an ASSUMPTION about a nuclear reaction and treated it as "law" for decades. Now the end result is shown to be quite different than the prevailing theory.
If they can be wrong about a "hot" fusion reaction they can also be wrong about a "cold" fusion (LENR) reaction.
Apr 10, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
(Variation of preventing a drop of water from evaporating)
(Return the drop to the ocean. Very unscientific. lol)
Otto's echo: Buddhistic, Philo, cladcrap. lol
Apr 11, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (1)
A guy like you should be lepton.
This gives me a Hadron.
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Or rather was. See scienceblogs.com/aardvarchaeology/2011/04/chairman_of_the_swedish_skepti.php
Seems to be an interesting person. See "Hanno Essen, a leader without responsibility" on vetenskap-folkbildning.nu/2011/03/hanno-essen-en-ledare-utan-ansvar/
Do have a look at that "Pure Energy Systems" homepage with its attractive (Iranian?) flying saucer picture.
If somebody knows Swedish, please have a look at this forum where they are discussing Hanno Essen's engagement in "cold fusion": vof.se/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=14786 .