Nanotechnologists must take lessons from nature

Apr 28, 2011
The simple E. coli bacterium shown computes 1,000 times faster than the most powerful computer chip, its memory density is 100 million times higher and it needs only 100 millionth the power to operate. Credit: Jenni Ohnstad, Vanderbilt University

It's common knowledge that the perfect is the enemy of the good, but in the nanoscale world, perfection can act as the enemy of the best.

In the workaday world, engineers and scientists go to great lengths to make the devices we use as perfect as possible. When we flip on a light switch or turn the key on the car, we expect the lights to come on and the engine to start every time, with only rare exceptions. They have done so by using a top-down design process combined with the application of large amounts of energy to increase reliability by suppressing natural variability.

However, this brute-force approach will not work in the nanoscale world that scientists are beginning to probe in the search for new electrical and mechanical devices. That is because objects at this scale behave in a fundamentally different fashion than larger-scale objects, argue Peter Cummings, John R. Hall Professor Chemical Engineering at Vanderbilt University, and Michael Simpson, professor of materials science and engineering at University of Tennessee, Knoxville, in an article in the April issue of the ACS Nano journal.

The defining difference between the behaviors of large-scale and nanoscale objects is the role that "noise" plays. To scientists noise isn't limited to unpleasant sounds; it is any kind of random disturbance. At the level of atoms and molecules, noise can take the form of random motion, which dominates to such an extent that it is extremely difficult to make reliable devices.

Nature, however, has managed to figure out how to put these fluctuations to work, allowing to operate reliably and far more efficiently than comparable man-made devices. It has done so by exploiting the contrarian behavior that random behavior allows.

"Contrarian investing is one strategy for winning in the stock market," Cummings said, "but it may also be a fundamental feature of all natural processes and holds the key to many diverse phenomena, including the ability of the human immunodeficiency virus to withstand modern medicines."

In their paper, Cummings and Simpson maintain that in any given population, random fluctuations – the "noise" – cause a small minority to act in a fashion contrary to the majority and can help the group respond to changing conditions. In this fashion, less perfection can actually be good for the whole.

Mimicking cells

At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, where the two researchers work, they are exploring this basic principle through a combination of creating virtual simulations and constructing physical cell mimics, synthetic systems constructed on the biological scale that exhibit some cell-like characteristics.

"Instead of trying to make perfect decisions based on imperfect information, the cell plays the odds with an important twist: it hedges its bets. Sure, most of the cells will place bets on the likely winner, but an important few will put their money on the long shot," Simpson said. "That is the lesson of nature, where a humble bacterial cell outperforms our best computer chips by a factor of 100 million, and it does this in part by being less than perfect."

Following the lead of nature means understanding the role of chance. For example, in the AIDS virus, most infected cells are forced to produce new viruses that infect other cells. But a few of the infected cells flip the virus into a dormant state that escapes detection.

"Like ticking bombs, these dormant infections can become active sometime later, and it is these contrarian events that are the main factor preventing the eradication of AIDS," Simpson said.

"Our technology has fought against this chance using a brute force approach that consumes a lot of power," Cummings said. As a result, one of the factors limiting the building of more powerful computers is the grid-busting amount of energy they require.

Yet residing atop the cabinets of these supercomputers, basking in the heat generated in the fight to suppress the element of chance, the lowly bacteria show us another way.

Explore further: Quantum effects in nanometer-scale metallic structures

Related Stories

Nature still sets standard for nanoscience revolution

Apr 19, 2011

(PhysOrg.com) -- By striving for control and perfection in everything from computer chips to commercial jets, scientists and engineers actually exclude a fundamental force that allows nature to outperform even their best ...

Human cells exhibit foraging behavior like bacteria

Mar 17, 2010

(PhysOrg.com) -- When cells move about in the body, they follow a complex pattern similar to that which amoebae and bacteria use when searching for food, a team of Vanderbilt researchers have found.

Noisy nature of atoms

Sep 09, 2004

University of California scientists working at Los Alamos National Laboratory have demonstrated a way to use the random fluctuations that exist naturally in all magnetic systems to perform magnetic resonance studies without ...

Recommended for you

Quantum effects in nanometer-scale metallic structures

3 hours ago

Plasmonic devices combine the 'super speed' of optics with the 'super small' of microelectronics. These devices exhibit quantum effects and show promise as possible ultrafast circuit elements, but current ...

Researchers develop world's thinnest electric generator

Oct 15, 2014

Researchers from Columbia Engineering and the Georgia Institute of Technology report today that they have made the first experimental observation of piezoelectricity and the piezotronic effect in an atomically ...

User comments : 2

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet May 08, 2011
In this fashion, less perfection can actually be good for the whole.


Then your definition of "perfect" is flawed.

The simple E. coli bacterium shown computes 1,000 times faster than the most powerful computer chip,


No it doesn't. It isn't even physically possible for biological systems to compete with the existing computer technology in pure speed, because they communicate by molecular transport mechanisms which must move signal carriers which are thousands or ten thousands of times more massive, therefore automatically slower.

its memory density is 100 million times higher


This is true of today's electronic computers, but come back in 10 years. Also, a cell has an advantage in this comparison in that it's DNA is single-function "static" memory, who's values and functions never change except in mutation.

A computer has dynamic, multi-purpose memory which can change to any type of data or algorithm as needed. The comparison is absurd.
Quantum_Conundrum
not rated yet May 08, 2011
The maximum potential memory density in an electronic computer, even using ONLY technologies that have already been demonstrated at least somewhere in the world, GREATLY exceeds the maximum memory density of a biological cell, even with the "handicap" of needing to be 100% dynamic to serve it's function.

With 3-d architecture, there is no reason why an electronic computer using ~4nm transistors couldn't "eventually" be made to have memory densities in excess of several Gigabytes inside the volume of a cell, even when "wasting" 90% of space in each dimension on scaffolding, cooling, and power supply.