Large galaxies stopped growing 7 billion years ago

Apr 20, 2011
The Brightest Cluster Galaxy (BCG) appears as the orange arc in this Hubble Space Telescope image of galaxy cluster Abell 2218. Credit: NASA, ESA, and Johan Richard (Caltech, USA)

(PhysOrg.com) -- Galaxies are thought to develop by the gravitational attraction between and merger of smaller 'sub-galaxies', a process that standard cosmological ideas suggest should be ongoing. But new data from a team of scientists from Liverpool John Moores University directly challenges this idea, suggesting that the growth of some of the most massive objects stopped 7 billion years ago when the Universe was half its present age. On Monday 18 April team member Claire Burke will present their work at the Royal Astronomical Society's National Astronomy Meeting (NAM 2011) in Llandudno, Wales.

How galaxies form and then evolve is still a major unanswered question in astronomy. The sub-galaxy units thought to have merged to make galaxies, are themselves associated with fluctuations in the density of material in the cosmos left over from the Big Bang and seen today as temperature 'ripples' in the cosmic background radiation.

To study , the team, which also included Professor Chris Collins and Dr John Stott (now at the University of Durham) looked at the most in the Universe, known as Brightest Cluster Galaxies (BCGs) and so called because of their location at the centre of , structures that typically contain hundreds of galaxies.

In the nearby Universe BCGs are elliptical in shape and are the largest, most uniform and most massive class of galaxies observed, with each galaxy having a mass equivalent to up to 100 trillion (100 million million) Suns. Like smaller elliptical galaxies, BCGs are composed of old red stars and are thought to have formed through mergers of the dense population of sub-galaxies that were found in the centre of galaxy clusters. By studying how BCGs grow in size gives an insight into the formation and evolution of galaxies in general.

Measuring the sizes of BCGs has always been difficult as their outer regions are very faint. Burke and her team have overcome this by using long exposure images from the Hubble Space Telescope data archive that pick up the dimmer parts of these galaxies. The BCGs they studied are so distant that the light we detect from them left 7 billion years ago, so they appear as they were when the Universe was less than half its present age.

When they examined the Hubble images, the team found that these distant BCGs are almost the same size as their nearby counterparts and that these galaxies can have grown by at most 30% in the last 9 billion years. This is in line with other work by the same research group, but is quite unlike the observed development of 'regular' . More significantly, conventional simulations of the evolution of the Universe predict that BCGs should have at least tripled in size over that time.

Ms Burke comments: "The lack of growth of the most massive galaxies is a major challenge to current models of the formation and evolution of large scale structure in the Universe. Our work suggests that cosmologists appear to lack some of the crucial ingredients they need to understand how galaxies evolved from the distant past to the present day."

Explore further: Astronomers find 'cousin' planets around twin stars

More information: The results of this study have been accepted for publication in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Stott et al., 2011, MNRAS, 432).

Related Stories

Survey Reveals Building Block Process For Biggest Galaxies

Apr 12, 2006

A new study of the universe's most massive galaxy clusters shows how mergers play a critical role in their evolution. Astronomers used the twin Gemini Observatory instruments in Hawaii and Chile, and the Hubble Space Telescope ...

Heavyweight galaxies puzzle astronomers

Apr 02, 2009

(PhysOrg.com) -- Astronomers have discovered large galaxies some two thirds of the way back in time to the big bang. This surprising find casts doubt on theories of how the biggest galaxies form.

Recommended for you

How small can galaxies be?

Sep 29, 2014

Yesterday I talked about just how small a star can be, so today let's explore just how small a galaxy can be. Our Milky Way galaxy is about 100,000 light years across, and contains about 200 billion stars. Th ...

The coolest stars

Sep 29, 2014

One way that stars are categorized is by temperature. Since the temperature of a star can determine its visual color, this category scheme is known as spectral type. The main categories of spectral type are ...

Simulations reveal an unusual death for ancient stars

Sep 29, 2014

(Phys.org) —Certain primordial stars—those 55,000 and 56,000 times the mass of our Sun, or solar masses—may have died unusually. In death, these objects—among the Universe's first-generation of stars—would ...

User comments : 4

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

6_6
not rated yet Apr 20, 2011
it's probably true
Tuxford
1.8 / 5 (8) Apr 20, 2011
Again, galaxies likely grow from new matter ejected from the non-black core mother star. (We just saw a galactic core explode in the last few weeks.) Over time, the largest galaxies become the giant ellipticals, in the center of the clusters. These giants seem much older than the Big Bang fantasy model allows. Still, physics can't get away from the black hole math model, likely in part due to disinformation support from the mil/intel community.
ubavontuba
4 / 5 (4) Apr 20, 2011
Is it coincidence this change occurs about the time the accelerated expansion began (5 - 7 billion years ago, more or less)?
omatumr
1 / 5 (1) Apr 23, 2011
Again, galaxies likely grow from new matter ejected from the non-black core mother star. (We just saw a galactic core explode in the last few weeks.)


Thanks, Tuxford, for stating the obvious again.

Nuclear rest mass data reveals the powerful energy source that powers the cores of stars and galaxies, generating hydrogen as a waste product (from neutron decay).

1. "The Sun's origin, composition and source of energy"
http://xxx.lanl.g.../0411255

2. "Attraction and repulsion of nucleons: Sources of stellar energy"
www.omatumr.com/a...tnuc.pdf

3. "Neutron repulsion confirmed as energy source"
http://www.spring...6685079/

4. "The standard solar model versus experimental observations"
(IOP, Bristol, editor: H. V. Klapdor-Kleingrothaus) pp. 307-316 (2003).
http://arxiv.org/.../0404064

5. "Neutron Repulsion", The
APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages (2011);
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1

With regards,
Oliver Manuel