Indian newlyweds offered cash to delay having children

Apr 28, 2011 by Karishma Vyas

While countries like Japan, Canada and Australia hand out "baby bonuses" to encourage people to have children, couples in one part of India are getting cash to do just the opposite.

Maharashtra state is paying newlyweds a so-called "honeymoon" bonus to delay starting a family, with the twin aims of slowing population growth and improving women's health.

Rajia Sayad was 20 when she married her husband Shakil in 2007. The couple lives with his parents in Shendurjane village in Satara district, about 250 kilometres (155 miles) from the state capital, Mumbai.

Money is tight and not always regular. Rajia is an unpaid housewife and Shakil is a musician, earning 200 to 2,500 rupees ($4.40 to $55) a month during the wedding season. His father earns about 3,000 rupees a month selling fruit.

The young couple signed up for the scheme soon after they were married.

"We didn't want a child so soon," she told AFP. "Our circumstances weren't so good. I was also feeling physically weak and I didn't want any problems with the child in the future. That's why we took the decision."

Rajia and other women like her were attracted by the offer of 5,000 rupees in cash if they stayed childless for two years after their nuptials. If they hold out for another year, they receive an extra 2,500 rupees.

The scheme is voluntary: the only conditions being that the marriage has to be registered with the government and that participants sign a consent form confirming that they are taking part of their own free will.

Over the first two years, couples have to attend compulsory counselling and education classes every three months.

The sessions include advice. Free condoms and the oral contraceptive pill are available. Even abortions can be arranged.

India's population jumped to 1.21 billion in 2011 from 1.02 billion in 2001, according to provisional census figures released last month.

Only China -- with 1.34 billion -- has more people, but is set to surpass its Asian rival and neighbour by 2030.

The family remains the cornerstone of Indian society, particularly in more conservative rural areas, with children seen as a guarantee of future income and support where little or no state help exists.

Sanjay Gandhi, son of the then prime minister Indira Gandhi, made attempts to control in the 1970s, but his sterilisation scheme was so controversial that no serious nationwide project has been attempted since.

Doctors at the state health authority in Pune say four out of every 10 brides in Maharashtra are under 18 -- the legal age of marrriage.

In Satara district, brides are typically aged 19 and more than 80 percent conceive within a year.

Dr Prakash Doke said schemes to encourage later conception were vital because of the impact of childbirth on young women.

"If the age of the girl is less than 18 or less than 20, the chances of maternal mortality and the new-born death rate are very high," he said.

Thirty-one out of every 1,000 children born in Satara district die before their first birthday.

In India as a whole, around 254 women died from pregnancy-related causes out of 100,000 live births in 2008, according to a study published last year in the British medical journal The Lancet.

Local midwife Ratnamala Jaganath Shelar says that changing traditional attitudes is tough.

"The in-laws don't think that their daughter-in-law is still small, isn't old enough and her body hasn't fully developed yet. They don't like all this (the scheme). They just want a child," she said.

Nearly 4,300 couples, though, have challenged tradition and signed up for the "honeymoon" project since its inception in 2007. Close to 1,200 have completed the programme. Some 150 couples have dropped out.

The project is due to end next year but three other districts in Maharahstra are now looking to start their own. The initiative has also attracted interest from Madhya Pradesh in central India and Jharkhand in the east.

As for Rajia and Shakil, the couple still plans to have children at some point -- ideally a boy and a girl -- but only when the time is right.

"If you have a child you should be able to take care of it, right?" said Rajia.

Explore further: Major U.S. food makers cut 6.4 trillion calories from products: report

add to favorites email to friend print save as pdf

Related Stories

Children's sex affects parents' marital status

May 23, 2006

Parents with a boy and a girl are more likely to stay married, or get married if they were unmarried when their children were born, than those with two boys or two girls according to new research from ANU economist Dr Andrew ...

Census spotlights India's 'missing girls'

Apr 03, 2011

The problem of India's "missing girls" has been put under a harsh spotlight by new census data showing the ratio of female to male children at its lowest level since independence in 1947.

Recommended for you

Study: Americans endure unwanted care near death

8 hours ago

Americans suffer needless discomfort and undergo unwanted and costly care as they die, in part because of a medical system ruled by "perverse incentives" for aggressive care and not enough conversation about what people want, ...

Failed Medicare payments law remains relevant

8 hours ago

In a new commentary in the journal JAMA Surgery, Dr. Eli Adashi recounts what he and other advocates saw as merits of the originally bipartisan Sustainable Growth Rate Repeal and Medicare Provider Paymen ...

User comments : 3

Adjust slider to filter visible comments by rank

Display comments: newest first

ShotmanMaslo
5 / 5 (2) Apr 28, 2011
Such population control measures, whether voluntary or not, are crucial for all poor countries with exploding populations, and should have been established long ago. Way to go, India!
pm861207
5 / 5 (1) Apr 28, 2011
Documentary - "Unacceptable India: A Reporter's Account" reveals that India is a growing world power and a nation to reckon with, but hunger deaths are still gnawing at its roots. This report puts together 20 years of stories from across the country where farmers have committed suicides or children are suffering from hunger and malnutrition. India is in the list of top five powerful countries but the inside story is still the worst. I personally thinks that government should take useful and powerful remedies to end up the problem of malnutrition and starvation.

To watch please visit - Culture Unplugged
TheGhostofOtto1923
1 / 5 (1) May 01, 2011
I personally thinks that government should take useful and powerful remedies to end up the problem of malnutrition and starvation.
The only lasting remedy for this is to end those religion-based cultures which emphasize reproduction as a means of aggression. This is being accomplished by a number of means; exacerbation of food shortages unfortunately being one of them. One notable and extreme example of this Mechanism was Holodomor.
http://en.wikiped...olodomor

Another example is conditions created by US bombing of irrigation reservoirs near the end of the korean war, which caused the starvation of perhaps 1M N Koreans.