First galaxies were born much earlier than expected (w/ video)
The giant cluster of elliptical galaxies in the centre of this image contains so much dark matter mass that its gravity bends light. This means that for very distant galaxies in the background, the cluster’s gravitational field acts as a sort of magnifying glass, bending and concentrating the distant object’s light towards Hubble. These gravitational lenses are one tool astronomers can use to extend Hubble’s vision beyond what it would normally be capable of observing. Using Abell 383, a team of astronomers have identified and studied a galaxy so far away we see it as it was less than a billion years after the Big Bang. Viewing this galaxy through the gravitational lens meant that the scientists were able to discern many intriguing features that would otherwise have remained hidden, including that its stars were unexpectedly old for a galaxy this close in time to the beginning of the Universe. This has profound implications for our understanding of how and when the first galaxies formed, and how the diffuse fog of neutral hydrogen that filled the early Universe was cleared. Credit: NASA, ESA, J. Richard (CRAL) and J.-P. Kneib (LAM). Acknowledgement: Marc Postman (STScI)
(PhysOrg.com) -- Using the amplifying power of a cosmic gravitational lens, astronomers have discovered a distant galaxy whose stars were born unexpectedly early in cosmic history. This result sheds new light on the formation of the first galaxies, as well as on the early evolution of the Universe.
Johan Richard, the lead author of a new study says: "We have discovered a distant galaxy that began forming stars just 200 million years after the Big Bang. This challenges theories of how soon galaxies formed and evolved in the first years of the Universe. It could even help solve the mystery of how the hydrogen fog that filled the early Universe was cleared."
Richard's team spotted the galaxy in recent observations from the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, verified it with observations from the NASA Spitzer Space Telescope and measured its distance using W. M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii.
This video is not supported by your browser at this time.
This video shows a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing, which is used by astronomers to study very distant and very faint galaxies. Credit: NASA, ESA
The distant galaxy is visible through a cluster of galaxies called Abell 383, whose powerful gravity bends the rays of light almost like a magnifying glass. The chance alignment of the galaxy, the cluster and the Earth amplifies the light reaching us from this distant galaxy, allowing the astronomers to make detailed observations. Without this gravitational lens, the galaxy would have been too faint to be observed even with today's largest telescopes.After spotting the galaxy in Hubble and Spitzer images, the team carried out spectroscopic observations with the Keck-II telescope in Hawaii. Spectroscopy is the technique of breaking up light into its component colours. By analysing these spectra, the team was able to make detailed measurements of its redshift and infer information about the properties of its component stars.
The galaxy's redshift is 6.027, which means we see it as it was when the Universe was around 950 million years old. This does not make it the most remote galaxy ever detected several have been confirmed at redshifts of more than 8, and one has an estimated redshift of around 10 (heic1103), placing it 400 million years earlier. However the newly discovered galaxy has dramatically different features from other distant galaxies that have been observed, which generally shine brightly with only young stars.
"When we looked at the spectra, two things were clear," explains co-author Eiichi Egami. "The redshift placed it very early in cosmic history, as we expected. But the Spitzer infrared detection also indicated that the galaxy was made up of surprisingly old and relatively faint stars. This told us that the galaxy was made up of stars already nearly 750 million years old pushing back the epoch of its formation to about 200 million years after the Big Bang, much further than we had expected."
Co-author Dan Stark continues: "Thanks to the amplification of the galaxy's light by the gravitational lens, we have some excellent quality data. Our work confirms some earlier observations that had hinted at the presence of old stars in early galaxies. This suggests that the first galaxies have been around for a lot longer than previously thought."
This illustration shows a phenomenon known as gravitational lensing, which is used by astronomers to study very distant and very faint galaxies. Note that the scale has been greatly exaggerated in this diagram. In reality, the distant galaxy is much further away and much smaller. Lensing clusters are clusters of elliptical galaxies whose gravity is so strong that they bend the light from the galaxies behind them. This produces distorted, and often multiple images of the background galaxy. But despite this distortion, gravitational lenses allow for greatly improved observations as the gravity bends the light’s path towards Hubble, amplifying the light and making otherwise invisible objects observable. A team of astronomers has used Abell 383, one such gravitational lens, to observe a distant galaxy whose light is resolved into two images by the cluster. The gravitational lensing effect means that astronomers have been able to determine fascinating insights about the galaxy that would not normally be visible even with Hubble or large ground-based telescopes. Among their discoveries is that the distant galaxy’s stars are very old, meaning that galaxies probably formed earlier in cosmic history than we first thought. Credit: NASA, ESA
The discovery has implications beyond the question of when galaxies first formed, and may help explain how the Universe became transparent to ultraviolet light in the first billion years after the Big Bang. In the early years of the cosmos, a diffuse fog of neutral hydrogen gas blocked ultraviolet light in the Universe. Some source of radiation must therefore have progressively ionised the diffuse gas, clearing the fog to make it transparent to ultraviolet rays as it is today a process known as reionisation.Astronomers believe that the radiation that powered this reionisation must have come from galaxies. But so far, nowhere near enough of them have been found to provide the necessary radiation. This discovery may help solve this enigma.
"It seems probable that there are in fact far more galaxies out there in the early Universe than we previously estimated it's just that many galaxies are older and fainter, like the one we have just discovered," says co-author Jean-Paul Kneib. "If this unseen army of faint, elderly galaxies is indeed out there, they could provide the missing radiation that made the Universe transparent to ultraviolet light."
As of today, we can only discover these galaxies by observing through massive clusters that act as cosmic telescopes. In coming years, the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope, scheduled for launch later this decade, will specialise in high resolution observations of distant, highly redshifted objects. It will therefore be in an ideal position to solve this mystery once and for all.
More information: The research will appear in a paper entitled Discovery of a possibly old galaxy at z=6.027, multiply imaged by the massive cluster Abell 383, to be published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
Provided by
ESA/Hubble Information Centre
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
20 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (20) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
20 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
20 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
1
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
20 hours ago |
5 / 5 (6) |
0
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...

Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (25)
Eventually, as we make better and better telescopes and arrays, scientists will discover that stars existed closer and closer to the "beginning"...eventually all the way back to...four days, or roughly 96 hours...
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 4.8 / 5 (16)
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 4.4 / 5 (13)
I'm simply unable to fathom how somebody could believe something like that. What if QC is just a troll.
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (19)
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (2)
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 2.5 / 5 (4)
Personally, I think it will be interesting when ESO's E-ELT comes on line. That should push back the observable horizon quite a bit with a 42m filled aperture mirror.
http://www.eso.or...es/eelt/
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (14)
Well, yes, when you are looking at something which is supposedly that far away, you are basicly collecting individual photons, which means quantum properties become problematic.
Something else they failed to mention is that gravitational lensing is unreliable at best, since you don't actually "know" the degree of warping. For all they know, they could be looking at light which has been bent completely around the lense from THIS side.
personally, I think they should re-make around 12 upgraded versions of Hubble, an launch them as follows:
4 geostationary orbits offset by 90 degrees.
4 polar orbits along an appropriate plane, offset 90degrees
4 additional polar orbits along a perpendicular plane to the other orbits, offsets of 90 degrees.
See below...
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (9)
The data from this array would allow you to combine Deep Fields to produce composite 3-d perspective images with exceptional resolution, essentially simulating an 12,800km telescope, but with no atmospheric interference.
Additionally, observation time for individual scopes could be arranged to make use of the time when they are not able to view the primary target(s).
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (2)
I'd agree with this at least some the scopes formed a long-baseline interferometer.
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 4.1 / 5 (14)
I don't think you understand what a "day" is or why the concept of a "day" is meaningless here...
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (5)
What if we had say 100 Hubble telescopes up there? It would really make difference because the cosmos is so big we can't comprehend it, not even You Quantom (no it all) Guy.
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (8)
In case you hadn't noticed, this is what the writer actually wrote:
and that makes perfectly reasonable sense.
If our Sun is 5 billion years old, then those stars must have been very much bigger with much quicker life span.
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (7)
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 2.1 / 5 (8)
MOG.
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1.5 / 5 (8)
http://www.physor...ung.html
Giant galactic clusters early on in the universe? Structures evenly spaced early in history similar to today in an expanding universe? Tremendous ejections from galactic centers having star forming regions such as M82 and Centarus A? Young population of stars near center of M31, with it's periodic ring structure? Stars moving away from our own galactic center almost anywhere sampled?
http://www.physor...ter.html
Isn't it time to rethink presumptions? Taken alone, a news item can be discounted. Consider the sum instead...
Apr 12, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
Apr 13, 2011
Rank: 1.7 / 5 (6)
Apr 13, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Should be full circle...
Apr 13, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (6)
So dark matter is now a reality. Just like evolution from one ancestor to all living organisms. Repeat it often enough and magically it becomes true.
I've said it before, more and more of these galaxies and stars closer to the mythical "beginning" of the big bang will be found to be just as stale and old looking as those closer to us. This falsifies the big bang as it currently stands.
Other galaxies have also been found quite close to us, having only bright young stars. So how does one differentiate between what is far and "should be young" and what is closer to home? You can't. Not until you've catalogued ALL of them. And that's going to take a lot of time. LOTS of time
Apr 13, 2011
Rank: 4.9 / 5 (7)
Well, you know all about that process! How's it working out?
and yet
Tip - a logical argument hold together much more effectively if you don't contradict yourself halfway through ;-)
Apr 13, 2011
Rank: 4.3 / 5 (6)
I'll ignore the gaping hole in that logic; "will be found" (future tense) versus "faslsifies" (present tense). How does it falsify BB theory - explain your logic? If anything, finding earlier star & galaxy formation seems to butress the theory, helping account for the ionisation of the hydrogen fog.
That said, I am no cosmologist, don't have the training nor the math to truly add to the scientific debate, be it 'for' or 'against'. Nor do I have any emotional investment in BB theory being true or false. But then, my view of my place in the universe does not hinge on an irrational, 'at all costs' belief in the universe being 6,000 years old.
Believe in your god, Kev, by all means. But the bible is not a literal document - accept it, and move on.
Apr 13, 2011
Rank: 1.6 / 5 (7)
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
What happened? Did you get booted from Technology Review?
Apr 16, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
young bright stars are easier to see than older stars (Which are all smaller as big stars have short lifetimes, so non star forming and non quasar galaxies will be much harder to detect...things that we consider more common our part of the universe...) Like I always say, I'm not saying that the basics of the theory is wrong, but I am saying that they severely discount the possibility of observational bias due to natural limitations.
Apr 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
400 million years, and 750 million years are really long stretches of time. What this observation is really telling us is that our theories about star generation in the absence of metals need revising, or that we need to rethink the possibility of many generations of first order stars occurring in smaller spaces enabling metal enrichment to occur, which would then permit the type of small red stars we see to form
Apr 16, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)