Far-future astronomers could still deduce the Big Bang
Artist’s conception of the cosmic view a trillion years from now. Credit: David A. Aguilar (CfA)
(PhysOrg.com) -- One trillion years from now, an alien astronomer in our galaxy will have a difficult time figuring out how the universe began. They won't have the evidence that we enjoy today.
Edwin Hubble made the first observations in support of the Big Bang model. He showed that galaxies are rushing away from each other due to the universe's expansion. More recently, astronomers discovered a pervasive afterglow from the Big Bang, known as the cosmic microwave background, left over from the universe's white-hot beginning.
In a trillion years, when the universe is 100 times older than it is now, alien astronomers will have a very different view. The Milky Way will have merged with the Andromeda galaxy to form the Milkomeda galaxy. Many of its stars, including our Sun, will have burned out. The universe's ever-accelerating expansion will send all other galaxies rushing beyond our "cosmic horizon," sending them forever out of view.
The same expansion will cause the cosmic microwave background to fade out, stretching the wavelength of CMB photons to become longer than the visible universe. Without the clues of the CMB and distant, receding galaxies, how will these far-future astronomers know the Big Bang happened?
According to Harvard theorist Avi Loeb, clever astronomers in 1 trillion C.E. could still infer the Big Bang and today's leading cosmological theory, known as "lambda-cold dark matter" or LCDM. They will have to use the most distant light source available to them - hypervelocity stars flung from the center of Milkomeda.
"We used to think that observational cosmology wouldn't be feasible a trillion years from now," said Loeb, who directs the Institute for Theory and Computation at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. "Now we know this won't be the case. Hypervelocity stars will allow Milkomeda residents to learn about the cosmic expansion and reconstruct the past."
About once every 100,000 years, a binary-star system wanders too close to the black hole at our galaxy's center and gets ripped apart. One star falls into the black hole while the other is flung outward at a speed greater than 1 million miles per hour - fast enough to be ejected from the galaxy entirely.
Finding these hypervelocity stars is more challenging than spotting a needle in a haystack, but future astronomers would have a good reason to hunt diligently. Once they get far enough from Milkomeda's gravitational pull, these stars will get accelerated by the universe's expansion. Astronomers could measure that acceleration with technologies more advanced than we have today. This would provide a different line of evidence for an expanding universe, similar to Hubble's discovery but more difficult due to the very small effect being measured.
By studying stars within Milkomeda, they could infer when the galaxy formed. Combining that information with the hypervelocity star measurements, they could calculate the age of the universe and key cosmological parameters like the value of the cosmological constant (the lambda in LCDM).
"Astronomers of the future won't have to take the Big Bang on faith. With careful measurements and clever analysis, they can find the subtle evidence outlining the history of the universe," said Loeb.
More information: This research appears in a paper accepted for publication in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics and available online.
Provided by
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
-
From lemons to lemonade: Reaction uses carbon dioxide to make carbon-based semiconductor,
32 comments
-
Thioridazine kills cancer stem cells in human while avoiding toxic side-effects of conventional cancer treatments,
3 comments
-
SpaceX private rocket blasts off for space station (Update),
42 comments
-
Climate scientists say they have solved riddle of rising sea,
30 comments
-
Research team claims to have found evidence Lake Cheko is impact crater for Tunguska Event,
18 comments
-
revamping general concept and cosmological principle
May 25, 2012
-
Transiting Exoplanet Light Curve
May 25, 2012
-
Math behind Theoretical Physics
May 24, 2012
-
Do we know whats at the center of galaxies yet?
May 23, 2012
-
Structure of the Milky Way?
May 20, 2012
-
What would it take to terraform Pluto and Charon?
May 19, 2012
- More from Physics Forums - General Astronomy
More news stories
SpaceX capsule has 'new car' smell, astronauts say (Update)
SpaceX's Dragon cargo vessel smells like a new car, said astronauts at the International Space Station after opening the hatches Saturday following the spacecraft's landmark mission to the orbiting lab.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
19 hours ago |
4.5 / 5 (20) |
0
Astronomers seize last chance in lifetime for Venus Transit
Astronomers are gearing for one the rarest events in the Solar System: an alignment of Earth, Venus and the Sun that will not be seen for another 105 years.
19 hours ago |
5 / 5 (3) |
2
Australia hails surprise super-telescope decision
Australia has hailed a surprise decision giving it a role in a radio telescope project aimed at revolutionising astronomy, vowing to draw on its decades of experience in space science.
19 hours ago |
5 / 5 (4) |
1
Astronauts enter world's 1st private supply ship
(AP) -- Space station astronauts floated into the Dragon on Saturday, a day after its heralded arrival as the world's first commercial supply ship.
Space & Earth / Space Exploration
19 hours ago |
5 / 5 (5) |
0
Sophisticated simulations predict future warming
The chances of our planet being hit by a global warming of 3 degrees Celsius by 2050 is as likely as it being hit by an increase of 1.4 degrees, new research shows. Presented in the journal Nature Geoscience, the British study ...
Space & Earth / Earth Sciences
May 22, 2012 |
4.4 / 5 (9) |
51
Scientist: Evolution debate will soon be history
(AP) -- Richard Leakey predicts skepticism over evolution will soon be history. Not that the avowed atheist has any doubts himself.
Dell tablet leak: 10.1-inch display, two-battery choice
(Phys.org) -- Headline after headline talks about vendors tablets in the wings as likely number-one contenders for the iPad. Such claims have justifiably been taken with a grain of salt, considering ...
SpotterRF debuts Radar Backpack Kit (w/ Video)
(Phys.org) -- SpotterRF has announced a special radar backpack kit designed to enhance situational awareness for soldiers on the ground. The company says its special radar is designed for warfighters as part ...
Thousands of shellfish found dead in Peru
Thousands of crustaceans were found dead off the coast of Lima following the mystery mass death of dolphins and pelicans, the Peruvian Navy said Friday.
Keep food safety in mind this memorial day weekend
(HealthDay) -- Picnics, parades and cookouts are as much a part of Memorial Day weekend as tributes to the United States' war veterans.
Family history of Alzheimer's affects functional connectivity
(HealthDay) -- Cognitively normal individuals with a family history of late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) may display lower resting state functional connectivity in the default mode network (DMN) of the brain, ...
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (12)
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 1.1 / 5 (12)
What even makes you think that life could survive this alleged galactic merger, or that the galaxy would somehow be inhabitable/inhabited by human level intelligence at any time after such an even?
Oh yeah, nobody really cares about absurd projections of a trillion years into the future.
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 1.4 / 5 (9)
A trillion years from now, the universe will be very much the same as it is today in a relative way: evolving, changing, and unbounded, with its cosmic background radiation simply emanating from an eternity's worth of detritus, kept 'warm' in an infinite soup of photons.
Astronomers of the future may come to realize that Hubble jumped to an erroneous conclusion -- he was wrong.
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (5)
if it weren't hard to enough to keep believing in scientifically deduced truths like the origins of the heavy elements all coming from supernova, i do feel that speculation like this is where science becomes science fiction, or just plain fiction.
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (4)
Not being horribly versed in many areas of physics this statement brings up a question. Where does this energy go, and Why does it loose energy?
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 1.3 / 5 (3)
I thought about conservation of energy and the best that I could come-up with was that a photon looses (transfers) energy due to some sort of an interaction with space-time (gravity), sub-atomic particles (like neutrinos), or perhaps with other lower-energy photons.
It's easy to speculate but it's going to be darn difficult to prove.
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (5)
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 2.7 / 5 (3)
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (3)
Even if we could derive an answer, is there any way to prove it?
Is it even sane to ponder such things? Are such questions the result of our limited ability as observers? We are after all a biological organism, with basic limitations like brain capacity and sensory organs.
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (7)
Ergo, you haven't come up with anything...but you've decided that Hubble was just wrong. Priceless.
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 3.9 / 5 (7)
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 4.5 / 5 (4)
The term "Milky Way" was coined after the Greek word "galaxia" where "gala" is Greek for "milk". The mythos tells that Heracles was trying to drink from the breasts of goddess Hera but was pushed back whereby she spilled her milk all over the sky.
Andromeda was a mythical name, too.
"Milkomeda galaxy" thus would be something like a "Milkomeda Milky Way". A linguistic atrocity.
Apr 14, 2011
Rank: 5 / 5 (2)
Sorry QC... but you're pretty dumb.
Apr 15, 2011
Rank: 3 / 5 (1)
Apr 15, 2011
Rank: not rated yet
Apr 16, 2011
Rank: 1 / 5 (3)
If the rest of the universe, like our tiny corner, is powered by dynamic competition between
a.) Attractive forces of gravity, and
b.) Repulsive forces between neutrons
Then the universe may be infinite and cyclic [1,2] rather than finite and restricted to one direction of evolution.
1. "On the cosmic nuclear cycle and the similarity of nuclei and stars", Journal of Fusion Energy 25 (2006) pp. 107-114:
http://arxiv.org/...511051v1
2. Neutron Repulsion, The APEIRON Journal, in press, 19 pages:
http://arxiv.org/...2.1499v1