(PhysOrg.com) -- As Pennsylvania streams go, Conewago Creek in Dauphin, Lebanon and Lancaster counties is really nothing special. But remember the name, because it could hold the key to cleaning up the Chesapeake Bay.
Draining a rural, agriculture-dominated watershed of about 53 square miles and providing a water supply for the Elizabethtown area, the Conewago empties into the Susquehanna River near Three Mile Island at Falmouth. It's a pretty little stream in places, but much of it has been declared "impaired" by the state Department of Environmental Protection.
In other words, it is too polluted to sustain the kind of fish and other aquatic life that it could sustain if it were a healthy stream. Assessments have identified sediment and nutrients from runoff as the major cause of impairment. And because of that, it is the perfect laboratory for an experiment to see if nonpoint source pollution can be controlled and largely eliminated.
Penn State's College of Agricultural Sciences, collaborating with a local watershed group, county conservation districts, USDA's Natural Resource Conservation Service, municipalities, landowners and others recently launched a demonstration project in the Conewago watershed that is being watched closely by protectors of the bay.
"If what we are trying to do works here, we believe it can work in tributaries throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed," said Matt Royer, director of the Lower Susquehanna Initiative for Penn State's Ag and Environment Center.
The Conewago, which marks the county line between Dauphin and Lancaster counties, is not victimized only by agricultural runoff. While there are around 270 farms in the watershed, the creek also receives stormwater runoff from development.
Royer seems to be a good choice for the job. A lifelong resident of the watershed, he started a Conewago watershed group eight years ago -- the Tri-County Conewago Creek Association. Using grants from the state Department of Environmental Protection, the organization mobilized volunteers to plant trees along streams and to implement stream-bank-restoration projects to address nonpoint-source pollution.
The association even developed a watershed assessment and restoration plan, identifying 129 priority projects to improve the creek's water quality.
"But we couldn't do it all alone -- we realized we needed help, we needed partners," he said. "And at the same time, Penn State was looking for a place to successfully address the complex and challenging water-quality problems that are causing the pollution in the Chesapeake.
"Turns out the Conewago is the ideal watershed to address the problems in a focused, targeted way."
According to Royer, Penn State was looking to work with conservation districts and grassroots-based partners in an "ag-impaired" watershed in the excess-nutrient hotspot of southcentral Pennsylvania. The fact that Royer's group already had done an assessment and restoration plan made the Conewago all the more attractive.
"And the size of watershed was perfect -- not tiny but not so large that it encompassed a huge area," he said. "Our goal is to clean up this creek, to get the Conewago off the impaired-waters list."
To start with, Penn State is increasing outreach and education in the watershed, trying to tell as many farmers and residents about why clean water is important -- and trying to get them excited about improving water quality. "We want them to make a fundamental shift to adopt the land- management practices that improve water quality," he said. "We will work with landowners to employ best-management practices on the ground."
For farmers, this means ensuring every farm has up-to-date conservation plans and nutrient- or manure-management plans, required by state law. "Baseline compliance is a major component of Pennsylvania's Chesapeake Bay clean-up commitments," said Royer.
"Our ag-technician partners, the conservation districts and the Natural Resource Conservation Service are working with Conewago farmers, with the goal of having all farms in the watershed have plans in place. These plans will identify and prioritize the conservation practices they need to install."
Among the core best-management practices being promoted in the watershed:
--Using conservation tillage, such as no-till, to eliminate soil loss;
--Planting of cover crops in growers' rotations to have plants in the soil all the time, even through winter, to reduce erosion;
--Managing nutrients by using proper manure-application rates, and reducing runoff from barnyards;
--Erecting stream-bank fencing and riparian buffers to keep livestock out of streams. Forested buffers outperform grass buffers, Royer pointed out.
At the same time, Penn State researchers and extension educators are developing innovative practices that minimize nutrient loss while maximizing yields and bottom lines. "Manure application is a challenge in a no-till scenario because the manure does not get incorporated into the soil," Royer said.
"So Penn State Extension and the USDA Agricultural Research Service are offering opportunities for Conewago farmers to utilize equipment that injects manure into the ground. This minimizes surface runoff of nutrients or volatilization into the air, while directing the manure where it's needed the most -- in the soil for plant uptake."
Penn State Extension educators also have formed a discussion group of dairy farmers in the watershed that meets on a regular basis and discusses topics such as precision feeding, a practice that can reduce the amount of excess nutrients in manure. "We hope these innovative methods will take off as a result," he added.
Royer warned that it will take patience to assess the project, however. "We won't know right away if the actions being taken in the next few years are helping the Conewago," he said. "There could be a lag time of a decade or more until you see a difference in the stream. It can take 15 years after you plant a forested buffer for trees to mature."
Explore further: Pact with devil? California farmers use oil firms' water